Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA428023 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR6432897_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6432897_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6432898_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6432898_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR6432899_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 6 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Chromatin immuno-precipitation using anti-Flag (Sigma) antibodies in a U2OS stable cell line. Paired-end R1 and R2 reads are provided, but the processed (mapped) reads are from a single-end (R1 read only) mapping.
2015-12-03 | E-MTAB-3687 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Genomic DNA T b. brucei and T. b. rhodesiense. These are actually paired reads but the files are unpaired
2021-12-17 | E-MTAB-11303 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:MAK98 strain trypanosomes were cultured for 7 weeks. Control sequences are uploaded separately. These are paired reads in separate files.
2021-05-22 | E-MTAB-10466 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:For ATAC-seq data processing, we used the ENCODE ATAC-seq pipeline (https://www.encodeproject.org/atac-seq/). In detail, for each sample, ATAC-seq reads were first checked for adaptor contamination. Then, adaptor trimmed reads were aligned to hg19 using Bowtie2 under paired-end mode with parameter “-X2000”, which permits 2000 bp for the maximum allowable insert size between two paired ends of each read. Using the ENCODE ATAC-seq pipeline, duplicated reads were properly filtered out. ATAC-seq enriched peaks were called using MACS2 (Zhang et al., 2008) based on remaining unique reads with parameters “-f BAMPE -q 0.05 --nomodel”. In total, we collected 45,569 peaks for the ARID1AWT sample and 27,480 peaks for the ARID1AKO sample.
2020-06-08 | GSE106660 | GEO
Project description:The genome of two isogenic lines from Aedes aegypti from Ile Royale, French Guiana, with a marked difference in resistance to deltamethrin was investigated in order to understand the genetic basis of this phenotypic difference. Genomic sequencing was performed both with Illumina short, paired reads and with Minion long reads.
2024-01-01 | E-MTAB-13310 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Chromatin immuno-precipitation using anti-Flag (Sigma) or control IgG (Millipore) antibodies in a U2OS stable cell line. ZMYM2 has the synonym ZNF198. Note: paired-end sequencing libraires were created in this experiment but only the forward (R1) reads are available in this submission. The 'LIBRARY_LAYOUT' attribute is therefore set to be 'SINGLE' ather than 'PAIRED'.
2015-06-23 | E-MTAB-2701 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:ChIP-Seq, which combines chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with high-throughput massively parallel sequencing, is increasingly being used for identification of proteinM-bM-^@M-^SDNA interactions in-vivo in the genome. In general, current algorithms for ChIP-seq reads employ artificial estimation of the average length of DNA fragments for peak finding, leading to uncertain prediction of DNA-protein binding sites. Here, we present SIPeS (Site Identification from Paired-end Sequencing), a novel algorithm for precise identification of binding sites from short reads generated from paired-end Solexa ChIP-Seq technology. SIPeS uses a dynamic baseline directly via M-bM-^@M-^Xpiling upM-bM-^@M-^Y the corresponding fragments defined by the paired reads to efficiently find peaks corresponding to binding sites. The performance of SIPeS is demonstrated by analyzing the ChIP-Seq data of the Arabidopsis basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor ABORTED MICROSPORES (AMS). The robustness of SIPeS was demonstrated in higher sensitivity and spatial resolution in peak finding compared to three existing peak detection algorithms. Keywords: transcription factors (protein-DNA interactions) Examination of protein-DNA interactions in buds of Arabidopsis anther cell
2010-06-04 | E-GEOD-16940 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Whole exome sequencing of 5 HCLc tumor-germline pairs. Genomic DNA from HCLc tumor cells and T-cells for germline was used. Whole exome enrichment was performed with either Agilent SureSelect (50Mb, samples S3G/T, S5G/T, S9G/T) or Roche Nimblegen (44.1Mb, samples S4G/T and S6G/T). The resulting exome libraries were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq platform with paired-end 100bp reads to an average depth of 120-134x. Bam files were generated using NovoalignMPI (v3.0) to align the raw fastq files to the reference genome sequence (hg19) and picard tools (v1.34) to flag duplicate reads (optical or pcr), unmapped reads, reads mapping to more than one location, and reads failing vendor QC.
2016-02-01 | E-MTAB-4313 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:ChIP-Seq, which combines chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with high-throughput massively parallel sequencing, is increasingly being used for identification of protein–DNA interactions in-vivo in the genome. In general, current algorithms for ChIP-seq reads employ artificial estimation of the average length of DNA fragments for peak finding, leading to uncertain prediction of DNA-protein binding sites. Here, we present SIPeS (Site Identification from Paired-end Sequencing), a novel algorithm for precise identification of binding sites from short reads generated from paired-end Solexa ChIP-Seq technology. SIPeS uses a dynamic baseline directly via ‘piling up’ the corresponding fragments defined by the paired reads to efficiently find peaks corresponding to binding sites. The performance of SIPeS is demonstrated by analyzing the ChIP-Seq data of the Arabidopsis basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor ABORTED MICROSPORES (AMS). The robustness of SIPeS was demonstrated in higher sensitivity and spatial resolution in peak finding compared to three existing peak detection algorithms. Keywords: transcription factors (protein-DNA interactions)
2010-06-04 | GSE16940 | GEO
Project description:Amongst the various different insect groups, there is remarkable diversity in the number and size of wings. However the development of the basic body plan in insects is similar to a large extent. The genes of the hox complex regulate various pathways to bring about the development or modification of different organs. Ubx, a gene of the bithorax hox complex is expressed in the third thoracic segment of insects and is known to specify the fate of wing appendage in that segment.To understand the role of Ubx and how its regulatory mechanism has evolved through the course of evolution we have compared its genome wide targets in different insect orders. The identification of regulatory pathways and the key players Ubx regulates is crucial to understand how it has controlled wing development across insect orders. Our lab has previously identified direct targets of Ubx in Drosophila using ChIP-chip (Agrawal et al, 2011). To further our knowledge on the role of regulation in development and modification of hind wing appendage we have studied the targets in the hind wings of other insects (silk moth; Lepidoptera and honeybee; Hymenoptera) and performed a comparative analysis. We have employed ChIP followed by illumina sequencing to identify the targets of Ubx in developing hind and fore wing buds of Bombyx larvae. This is a first next generation sequencing study in Lepidoptera in an attempt to understand wing development. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was used to identify genome wide targets bound by Ubx in Bombyx larval wing buds. The experiment to enrich Ubx bound regions was carried out using a Bombyx N terminal-Ubx specific poylclonal antibody raised in Rabbit and purified against a Protein A column to obtain IgG fraction. An Immunoprecipitation (IP) with Normal Rabbit IgG was used as a negative control to eliminate the regions that pertained to non specific binding to an Immunogloubulin. The normalization of both ChIP and IgG was done against sequenced input chromatin. Two replicates of single end 36 bp reads were sequenced using Ilumina for all the three conditions and for both fore and hind wing tissue samples.The peaks common to both the replicates were considered after applying a FDR cutoff.The fore wing target set was used for comparison with the hind wing targets.
2016-07-27 | E-GEOD-71990 | biostudies-arrayexpress