XerD is required to unload bacterial SMC complexes at the replication terminus
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA604765 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:Bacillus subtilis SMC complexes are topologically loaded at centromeric sites adjacent to the replication origin by the partitioning protein ParB. These ring-shaped ATPases then translocate down the left and right chromosome arms while tethering them together. Here we show that the site-specific recombinase XerD that resolves chromosome dimers is required to unload SMC tethers when they reach the terminus. We identify XerD-specific binding sites in the terminus region and show that they dictate the site of unloading in a manner that depends on XerD but not its catalytic residue, its partner protein XerC, or the recombination site dif. Finally, we provide evidence that ParB and XerD homologs perform similar functions in Staphylococcus aureus. Thus, loading and unloading of SMC complexes are mediated by two broadly conserved factors: one involved in origin segregation, the other in terminus resolution. Similar site-specific unloading activities could modulate eukaryotic SMC complexes during interphase and mitosis.
2021-02-24 | GSE144742 | GEO
Project description:Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes play critical roles in chromosome dynamics in virtually all organisms but how they function remains poorly understood. In Bacillus subtilis, SMC condensin complexes are topologically loaded at centromeric sites adjacent to the replication origin. Here we provide evidence that these ring-shaped assemblies tether the left and right chromosome arms together while traveling from the origin to the terminus (>2 Mb) at rates >50kb/min. Condensin movement scales linearly with time arguing for an active transport mechanism. These data support a model in which SMC complexes function by processively enlarging DNA loops. Loop formation followed by processive enlargement provides a mechanism for how condensin complexes compact and resolve sister chromatids in mitosis and how cohesin generates topologically associating domains (TADs) during interphase.
2017-02-03 | GSE85612 | GEO
Project description:Chromosome organization by structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes is vital to living organisms. SMC complexes were recently found to be motors that extrude DNA loops. However, it remains unclear what happens when multiple complexes encounter one another in vivo on the same DNA and how interactions help organize an active genome. We created a crash-course track system to study SMC complex encounters in vivo by engineering the Bacillus subtilis chromosome to have defined SMC loading sites. Chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) analyses of over 20 engineered strains show an amazing variety of never-before-seen chromosome folding patterns. Via 3D polymer simulations and theory, we find that these patterns require SMC complexes to bypass each other in vivo, as recently seen in an in vitro study. We posit that the bypassing activity enables SMC complexes to spatially organize a functional and busy genome.
2021-06-10 | GSE155279 | GEO
Project description:SMC complexes, loaded at ParB-parS sites, are key mediators of chromosome organization in bacteria. ParA/Soj proteins interact with ParB/Spo0J in a pathway involving ATP-dependent dimerization and DNA binding, leading to chromosome segregation and SMC loading. In Bacillus subtilis, ParA/Soj also regulates DNA replication initiation, and along with ParB/Spo0J is involved in cell cycle changes during endospore formation. The first morphological stage in sporulation is the formation of an elongated chromosome structure called an axial filament. We now show that a major redistribution of SMC complexes drives axial filament formation, in a process regulated by ParA/Soj. Unexpectedly, this regulation is dependent on monomeric forms of ParA/Soj that cannot bind DNA or hydrolyse ATP. These results reveal a new role for ParA/Soj proteins in the regulation of SMC dynamics in bacteria, and yet further complexity in the web of interactions involving chromosome replication, segregation, and organization, controlled by ParAB and SMC.
2022-04-01 | GSE192868 | GEO
Project description:Chromosomes readily unlink from one another and segregate to daughter cells during cell division highlighting a remarkable ability of cells to organize long DNA molecules. SMC complexes mediate chromosome folding by DNA loop extrusion. In most bacteria, SMC complexes start loop extrusion at the ParB/parS partition complex formed near the replication origin. Whether they are recruited by recognizing a specific DNA structure in the partition complex or a protein component is unknown. By replacing genes in Bacillus subtilis with orthologous sequences from Streptococcus pneumoniae, we show that the three subunits of the bacterial Smc complex together with the ParB protein form a functional module that can organize and segregate chromosomes when transplanted into another organism. Using chimeric proteins and chemical cross-linking, we find that ParB binds to the Smc subunit directly. We map a binding interface to the Smc joint and the ParB CTP-binding domain. Structure prediction indicates how the ParB clamp presents DNA to the Smc complex to initiate DNA loop extrusion.
2022-03-01 | GSE190491 | GEO
Project description:Chromosomes readily unlink from one another and segregate to daughter cells during cell division highlighting a remarkable ability of cells to organize long DNA molecules. SMC complexes mediate chromosome folding by DNA loop extrusion. In most bacteria, SMC complexes start loop extrusion at the ParB/parS partition complex formed near the replication origin. Whether they are recruited by recognizing a specific DNA structure in the partition complex or a protein component is unknown. By replacing genes in Bacillus subtilis with orthologous sequences from Streptococcus pneumoniae, we show that the three subunits of the bacterial Smc complex together with the ParB protein form a functional module that can organize and segregate chromosomes when transplanted into another organism. Using chimeric proteins and chemical cross-linking, we find that ParB binds to the Smc subunit directly. We map a binding interface to the Smc joint and the ParB CTP-binding domain. Structure prediction indicates how the ParB clamp presents DNA to the Smc complex to initiate DNA loop extrusion.
2022-06-23 | GSE206446 | GEO
Project description:Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes, cohesin, condensin and Smc5/6, are essential for viability and participate in multiple processes, including sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, and DNA repair. Here we show that SUMO chains target all three SMC complexes and are antagonized by the SUMO protease Ulp2 to prevent their turnover. We uncover that the essential role of the cohesin-associated subunit Pds5 is to counteract SUMO chains jointly with Ulp2. Importantly, fusion of Ulp2 to kleisin Scc1 supports viability of PDS5 null cells and protects cohesin from proteasomal degradation mediated by the SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase Slx5/Slx8. The lethality of PDS5 deleted cells can also be bypassed by simultaneous loss of the PCNA unloader, Elg1, and the cohesin releaser, Wpl1, but only when Ulp2 is functional. Condensin and Smc5/6 complex are similarly guarded by Ulp2 against unscheduled SUMO-chain assembly, which we propose to time the availability of SMC complexes on chromatin.
2021-08-05 | PXD022717 | Pride
Project description:DNA-loop extruding SMC complexes can traverse one another in vivo
| PRJNA649231 | ENA
Project description:SMC complexes are widely conserved ATP-powered loop extrusion motors indispensable for the faithful segregation of chromosomes during cell division. How SMC complexes translocate along DNA for loop extrusion and what happens when two complexes meet on the same DNA molecule is largely unknown. Revealing the origins and the consequences of SMC encounters is crucial for understanding the folding process not only of bacterial, but also of eukaryotic chromosomes. Here, we uncover several factors that influence bacterial chromosome organization by modulating the probability of such clashes. These factors include the number, the strength and the distribution of Smc loading sites, the residence time on the chromosome, the translocation rate, and the cellular abundance of Smc complexes. By studying various mutants, we show that these parameters are fine-tuned to reduce the frequency of encounters between Smc complexes, presumably as a risk mitigation strategy. Mild perturbations hamper chromosome organization by causing Smc collisions, implying that the cellular capacity to resolve them is rather limited. Altogether, we identify mechanisms that help to avoid Smc collisions and their resolution by Smc traversal or other potentially risky molecular transactions.
2021-07-30 | GSE163573 | GEO
Project description:In the majority of bacterial species, the tripartite ParAB-parS system, composed of an ATPase (ParA), a DNA-binding protein (ParB), and its target parS sequence(s), assists in the chromosome partitioning. ParB forms large nucleoprotein complexes at parS(s), located in the vicinity of oriC, which after replication are subsequently relocated by ParA to polar positions. It was shown that ParB-parS complexes are loading platforms for structural maintenance of chromosome (Smc) proteins, which juxtapose the two arms of the circular chromosome. In this work, we characterized the Pseudomonas aeruginosa ParB interactions with DNA in the absence of Smc and interaction with the cognate ParA using chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIPseq). We show that in strains lacking Smc or strains with disturbed ParB-ParA interactions (ParA L84K or ParB G11A mutations) ParB is able to bind and spread around parS1-4 cluster and still binds to half-parS sites. Comparison of the ratio between the number of ChIP-seq reads mapping to region around parS1-4 with those mapping to ChIPseq peaks containing half-parSs indicate no major effect of the twod factors on the extent of ParB spreading, thus suggesting that the mechanisms controlling ParB association with the DNA do not involve interaction with cognate ParA partner and Smc.
2022-12-17 | GSE213881 | GEO