Project description:CD4 T cells are thought to help promote anti-tumour responses by ‘licensing’ antigen presenting cells (APCs) that activate CD8 T cells. Conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1s) are responsible for cross-presentation of tumour-derived antigens to CD8 T cells. Prevailing models presume that the cDC1 is licensed by CD4 T cells that are themselves activated by a distinct cDC subset, the cDC2. The recent finding that neoantigens presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules can promote rejection of tumours that lack MHC class II (MHC-II) surface expression is consistent with an indirect action of CD4 T cells, such as cDC1 licensing. However, no study has directly identified the APC that primes the CD4 T cells responsible for licensing or clearly identified the target of CD4 licensing in vivo. Here, we generated cDC1-specific Cre expressing mouse strain to inactivate or induce expression of MHC-I, MHC-II, or CD40 specifically within the cDC1 lineage. Using a tumour model that relies on CD8 T cells and CD4 T cells for rejection, we discovered that early priming of CD4 T cells against tumour-derived antigens, in contrast to soluble antigens, relied overwhelmingly on the cDC1 and not the cDC2. cDC1 do not simply transport antigen to lymph nodes for processing by cDC2, since lack of MHC-II expression on cDC1 prevented CD4 T cell priming. We also found that CD40 signaling not only affects licensing of cDC1 for CD8 T cell priming, but is also critical for the activation of CD4 T cells. Thus, in the setting of tumour-derived antigens, cDC1 can function as an autonomous platform, capable of priming both CD4 and CD8 T cells and orchestrating their cross-talk required for optimal anti-tumour immunity.
Project description:Conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1)1 are thought to perform antigen cross-presentation, which is required to prime CD8+ T cells2,3, whereas cDC2 are specialized for priming CD4+ T cells4,5. CD4+ T cells are also considered to help CD8+ T cell responses through a variety of mechanisms6-11, including a process whereby CD4+ T cells 'license' cDC1 for CD8+ T cell priming12. However, this model has not been directly tested in vivo or in the setting of help-dependent tumour rejection. Here we generated an Xcr1Cre mouse strain to evaluate the cellular interactions that mediate tumour rejection in a model requiring CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. As expected, tumour rejection required cDC1 and CD8+ T cell priming required the expression of major histocompatibility class I molecules by cDC1. Unexpectedly, early priming of CD4+ T cells against tumour-derived antigens also required cDC1, and this was not simply because they transport antigens to lymph nodes for processing by cDC2, as selective deletion of major histocompatibility class II molecules in cDC1 also prevented early CD4+ T cell priming. Furthermore, deletion of either major histocompatibility class II or CD40 in cDC1 impaired tumour rejection, consistent with a role for cognate CD4+ T cell interactions and CD40 signalling in cDC1 licensing. Finally, CD40 signalling in cDC1 was critical not only for CD8+ T cell priming, but also for initial CD4+ T cell activation. Thus, in the setting of tumour-derived antigens, cDC1 function as an autonomous platform capable of antigen processing and priming for both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and of the direct orchestration of their cross-talk that is required for optimal anti-tumour immunity.
Project description:Cancer cells evade T-cell-mediated killing through poorly understood mechanisms of tumour–immune interactions. Dendritic cells (DCs), especially type-1 conventional DCs (cDC1), mediate T-cell priming and therapeutic efficacy against tumours. Besides pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), how DC functions are shaped by other environmental cues remains incompletely defined. Nutrients are emerging mediators of adaptive immunity, but whether nutrients impact DC function or innate–adaptive cell communication is largely unresolved. Here, we establish glutamine as an intercellular metabolic checkpoint to mediate tumour–cDC1 crosstalk and license cDC1 functionality for activating cytotoxic T cells. Intratumoral glutamine supplementation inhibits tumour growth by augmenting cDC1-mediated CD8+ T-cell immunity, and also overcomes therapeutic resistance to checkpoint blockade and T-cell-mediated immunotherapies. Mechanistically, tumour cells and cDC1 compete for glutamine uptake via transporter SLC38A2 to tune anti-tumour immunity. Nutrient screening and integrative analyses show that glutamine is the dominant amino acid for promoting cDC1 function, by signalling via FLCN to impinge upon TFEB function. Loss of FLCN in DCs selectively impairs cDC1 function in vivo in a TFEB-dependent manner, and phenocopies SLC38A2 deficiency by abrogating anti-tumour therapeutic effect of glutamine supplementation. Our findings establish glutamine-mediated intercellular metabolic crosstalk between tumour cells and cDC1 that underpins tumour immunoevasion, and reveal glutamine acquisition and signalling in cDC1 as limiting events for DC activation and putative targets for cancer treatment.
Project description:Cancer cells evade T-cell-mediated killing through poorly understood mechanisms of tumour–immune interactions. Dendritic cells (DCs), especially type-1 conventional DCs (cDC1), mediate T-cell priming and therapeutic efficacy against tumours. Besides pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), how DC functions are shaped by other environmental cues remains incompletely defined. Nutrients are emerging mediators of adaptive immunity, but whether nutrients impact DC function or innate–adaptive cell communication is largely unresolved. Here, we establish glutamine as an intercellular metabolic checkpoint to mediate tumour–cDC1 crosstalk and license cDC1 functionality for activating cytotoxic T cells. Intratumoral glutamine supplementation inhibits tumour growth by augmenting cDC1-mediated CD8+ T-cell immunity, and also overcomes therapeutic resistance to checkpoint blockade and T-cell-mediated immunotherapies. Mechanistically, tumour cells and cDC1 compete for glutamine uptake via transporter SLC38A2 to tune anti-tumour immunity. Nutrient screening and integrative analyses show that glutamine is the dominant amino acid for promoting cDC1 function, by signalling via FLCN to impinge upon TFEB function. Loss of FLCN in DCs selectively impairs cDC1 function in vivo in a TFEB-dependent manner, and phenocopies SLC38A2 deficiency by abrogating anti-tumour therapeutic effect of glutamine supplementation. Our findings establish glutamine-mediated intercellular metabolic crosstalk between tumour cells and cDC1 that underpins tumour immunoevasion, and reveal glutamine acquisition and signalling in cDC1 as limiting events for DC activation and putative targets for cancer treatment.
Project description:Cancer cells evade T-cell-mediated killing through poorly understood mechanisms of tumour–immune interactions. Dendritic cells (DCs), especially type-1 conventional DCs (cDC1), mediate T-cell priming and therapeutic efficacy against tumours. Besides pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), how DC functions are shaped by other environmental cues remains incompletely defined. Nutrients are emerging mediators of adaptive immunity, but whether nutrients impact DC function or innate–adaptive cell communication is largely unresolved. Here, we establish glutamine as an intercellular metabolic checkpoint to mediate tumour–cDC1 crosstalk and license cDC1 functionality for activating cytotoxic T cells. Intratumoral glutamine supplementation inhibits tumour growth by augmenting cDC1-mediated CD8+ T-cell immunity, and also overcomes therapeutic resistance to checkpoint blockade and T-cell-mediated immunotherapies. Mechanistically, tumour cells and cDC1 compete for glutamine uptake via transporter SLC38A2 to tune anti-tumour immunity. Nutrient screening and integrative analyses show that glutamine is the dominant amino acid for promoting cDC1 function, by signalling via FLCN to impinge upon TFEB function. Loss of FLCN in DCs selectively impairs cDC1 function in vivo in a TFEB-dependent manner, and phenocopies SLC38A2 deficiency by abrogating anti-tumour therapeutic effect of glutamine supplementation. Our findings establish glutamine-mediated intercellular metabolic crosstalk between tumour cells and cDC1 that underpins tumour immunoevasion, and reveal glutamine acquisition and signalling in cDC1 as limiting events for DC activation and putative targets for cancer treatment.
Project description:Cancer cells evade T-cell-mediated killing through poorly understood mechanisms of tumour–immune interactions. Dendritic cells (DCs), especially type-1 conventional DCs (cDC1), mediate T-cell priming and therapeutic efficacy against tumours. Besides pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), how DC functions are shaped by other environmental cues remains incompletely defined. Nutrients are emerging mediators of adaptive immunity, but whether nutrients impact DC function or innate–adaptive cell communication is largely unresolved. Here, we establish glutamine as an intercellular metabolic checkpoint to mediate tumour–cDC1 crosstalk and license cDC1 functionality for activating cytotoxic T cells. Intratumoral glutamine supplementation inhibits tumour growth by augmenting cDC1-mediated CD8+ T-cell immunity, and also overcomes therapeutic resistance to checkpoint blockade and T-cell-mediated immunotherapies. Mechanistically, tumour cells and cDC1 compete for glutamine uptake via transporter SLC38A2 to tune anti-tumour immunity. Nutrient screening and integrative analyses show that glutamine is the dominant amino acid for promoting cDC1 function, by signalling via FLCN to impinge upon TFEB function. Loss of FLCN in DCs selectively impairs cDC1 function in vivo in a TFEB-dependent manner, and phenocopies SLC38A2 deficiency by abrogating anti-tumour therapeutic effect of glutamine supplementation. Our findings establish glutamine-mediated intercellular metabolic crosstalk between tumour cells and cDC1 that underpins tumour immunoevasion, and reveal glutamine acquisition and signalling in cDC1 as limiting events for DC activation and putative targets for cancer treatment.
Project description:The expression of the XCR1 chemokine receptor univocally identifies all type 1 conventional dendritic cells (cDC1) throughout the body. The gene encoding its ligand, XCL1, is expressed constitutively by innate lymphoid cells such as natural killer (NK) cells. The evolutionary conservation of XCR1, XCL1 in vertebrates suggests that they play a critical, yet uncharacterized, role in immune responses. Here we showed using mouse cytomegalovirus (MCMV) infection, that the XCL1/XCR1 axis promoted the intra-splenic repositioning of cDC1 towards IFN--producing NK cells forming superclusters around infected cells. There, cDC1 and NK cells engaged into physical interactions enhancing their respective production of IL-12 and IFN-. This feed-forward mechanism also led to NK cell production of GM-CSF, which upregulated CCR7 on cDC1, instructing them to migrate into the T cell area for the priming of CD8+ T cells. In conclusion, we identified a novel mechanism through which NK cells boost the relay between innate and adaptive immunities by regulating the spatiotemporal functions of cDC1.
Project description:RNA-seq of the immune-suppressed cDC1 was done to look into the mechanism underlying TLR9. It was then compared with the inflammatory cDC1 DCs.
Project description:To identify the direct targets of Zeb1 we performed ChIP-seq of wild type cDC1 cell line in unstimulated condition. cDC1 cell line was used for Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, it was then fixed and crosslinked and then fragmented and the fragmented DNA-protein was immunoprecipated using Zeb1 antibody. The chromatin sample was then used to prepare library using NEB kit following the manufacturer's protocol
Project description:Regulation of gene expression in splenic cDC1 isolated from WT vs XCR1-/- miceNK cells orchestrate cDC1 migration to potentiate antiviral protective CD8+ T cell responses