Proteomics

Dataset Information

0

A systematic analysis of methylpeptide false discovery rates


ABSTRACT: All large-scale LC-MS/MS post-translational methylation site discovery experiments require methylpeptide spectrum matches (methyl-PSMs) to be identified at acceptably low false discovery rates (FDRs). To meet estimated methyl-PSM FDRs, methyl-PSM filtering criteria are often determined using the target-decoy approach. The efficacy of this methyl-PSM filtering approach has, however, yet to be thoroughly evaluated. Here we conduct a systematic analysis of methyl-PSM FDRs across a range of sample preparation workflows (each differing in their exposure to the alcohols methanol and isopropanol) and mass spectrometric instrument platforms (each employing a different mode of MS/MS dissociation). Through 13CD3-methionine labeling (heavy-methyl SILAC) of S. cerevisiae cells and in-depth manual data inspection, accurate lists of true positive methyl-PSMs were determined, allowing methyl-PSM FDRs to be compared to target-decoy approach-derived methyl-PSM FDR estimates. These results show that global FDR estimates produce extremely unreliable methyl-PSM filtering criteria; we demonstrate that this is an unavoidable consequence of the high number of amino acid combinations capable of producing peptide sequences that are isobaric to methylated peptides of a different sequence. Separate methyl-PSM FDR estimates were also found to be unreliable due to prevalent sources of false positive methyl-PSMs that produce high peptide identity score distributions. Incorrect methylation site localizations, peptides containing cysteinyl-S-β-propionamide, and methylated glutamic or aspartic acid residues can partially, but not wholly, account for these false positive methyl-PSMs. Together these results indicate that the target-decoy approach is an unreliable means of estimating methyl-PSM FDRs and methyl-PSM filtering criteria. We suggest that orthogonal methylpeptide validation (e.g. heavy-methyl SILAC or its offshoots) should be considered a prerequisite for obtaining high confidence methyl-PSMs in large-scale LC-MS/MS methylation site discovery experiments, and make recommendations on how to reduce methyl-PSM FDRs in samples not amenable to heavy isotope labeling.

INSTRUMENT(S): LTQ Orbitrap Velos, Q Exactive

ORGANISM(S): Saccharomyces Cerevisiae (baker's Yeast)

TISSUE(S): Cell Culture

SUBMITTER: Gene Hart-Smith  

LAB HEAD: Marc Ronald Wilkins

PROVIDER: PXD002857 | Pride | 2016-01-05

REPOSITORIES: Pride

Dataset's files

Source:
Action DRS
3to1_QErpt_nostain_1.raw Raw
3to1_QErpt_nostain_10.raw Raw
3to1_QErpt_nostain_11.raw Raw
3to1_QErpt_nostain_12.raw Raw
3to1_QErpt_nostain_13.raw Raw
Items per page:
1 - 5 of 422
altmetric image

Publications

Large Scale Mass Spectrometry-based Identifications of Enzyme-mediated Protein Methylation Are Subject to High False Discovery Rates.

Hart-Smith Gene G   Yagoub Daniel D   Tay Aidan P AP   Pickford Russell R   Wilkins Marc R MR  

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP 20151223 3


All large scale LC-MS/MS post-translational methylation site discovery experiments require methylpeptide spectrum matches (methyl-PSMs) to be identified at acceptably low false discovery rates (FDRs). To meet estimated methyl-PSM FDRs, methyl-PSM filtering criteria are often determined using the target-decoy approach. The efficacy of this methyl-PSM filtering approach has, however, yet to be thoroughly evaluated. Here, we conduct a systematic analysis of methyl-PSM FDRs across a range of sample  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

2024-08-28 | PXD055277 | Pride
2011-06-10 | E-MTAB-406 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2006-11-06 | E-TABM-163 | biostudies-arrayexpress
| PRJEB18946 | ENA
2013-04-05 | E-GEOD-45617 | biostudies-arrayexpress
| PRJEB18920 | ENA
| PRJEB18921 | ENA
| PRJEB18922 | ENA
| PRJEB18918 | ENA
| PRJEB19022 | ENA