Dataset Information

Extended investigation of tube-gel sample preparation: a versatile and simple choice for high throughput quantitative proteomics

ABSTRACT: We investigated the compatibility of tube-gel with alternatives to SDS-based buffers allowing notably the extraction of proteins in various pH conditions. We also explored the use of photopolymerization to extend the number of possibilities, as it is compatible with a wide range of pH and is non-oxydative. To achieve this goal, we compared six extraction buffers in combination with two polymerization conditions to further optimize tube-gel protocol and evaluate its versatility.

INSTRUMENT(S): TripleTOF 5600

ORGANISM(S): Mus Musculus (mouse)

TISSUE(S): Cell Culture

SUBMITTER: Leslie MULLER

LAB HEAD: Sarah CIANFERANI

PROVIDER: PXD008656 | Pride | 2018-06-06

REPOSITORIES: Pride

ACCESS DATA

Dataset's files

Source:

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 310

Publications

Extended investigation of tube-gel sample preparation: a versatile and simple choice for high throughput quantitative proteomics.

Muller Leslie L Fornecker Luc L Chion Marie M Van Dorsselaer Alain A Cianférani Sarah S Rabilloud Thierry T Carapito Christine C

Scientific reports 20180529 1

Sample preparation for quantitative proteomics is a crucial step to ensure the repeatability and the accuracy of the results. However, there is no universal method compatible with the wide variety of protein extraction buffers currently used. We have recently demonstrated the compatibility of tube-gel with SDS-based buffers and its efficiency for label-free quantitative proteomics by comparing it to stacking gel and liquid digestion. Here, we investigated the compatibility of tube-gel with alter ...[more]

PMID: 29844437

Similar Datasets

Project description:Four protocols were adapted and compared to enrich extracellular matrix proteins from mouse skin: 1. compartmental enrichment; 2. chemical decellularization; 3. enzymatic decellularization using phospholipase A2; 4. quantitative detergent solubility profiling (QDSP). All four protocols were started the same day, each using 35 mg of frozen back skin taken from the same initial back skin piece. The experiment was repeated three times starting from three different mice. Compartmental enrichment: skin samples were processed using the CNMCS commercial kit. Briefly, the skin tissue was homogenized in buffer C and successively incubated under agitation in buffers W, N, M and CS supplemented with the protease inhibitors from the kit. Extraction buffer C and insoluble pellet were kept aside, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately. Chemical decellularization: skin samples were cut into small pieces and successively incubated in buffers containing NaCl, SDS/sodium deoxycholate, Triton X-100 and GuHCl. Extractions buffers as well as the final insoluble pellet were kept aside, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately. Enzymatic decellularization: skin samples were cut into small pieces and successively incubated in buffers containing NaCl, phosopholipase A2/sodium deoxycholate. Extraction buffers as well as the insoluble pellet were kept aside, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately. QDSP: skin samples were homogenized in sterile PBS and successively incubated in 3 buffers containing increasing concentrations in detergents (including SDS, sodium deoxycholate, NP-40) as previously described. Extraction buffers as well as the insoluble pellet were kept aside, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately. For comparison with the four protocols described above, total skin lysates were also prepared for two of the mice. In this case, 20 mg of mouse skin were homogenized and incubated in a lysis buffer containing SDS, β-mercaptoethanol. Samples were centrifuged and the supernatant was kept aside, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately.

			Action	DRS
	CTP_1.pride.mgf.gz	Mgf
	CTP_1.pride.mztab.gz	Mztab
	CTP_1.xml.gz	Xml
	CTP_2.pride.mgf.gz	Mgf
	CTP_2.pride.mztab.gz	Mztab