Proteomics

Dataset Information

0

A proteomic-informed view of the changes induced by loss of cellular adherence: the example of mouse macrophages


ABSTRACT: In vertebrates, all cells except circulating blood cells must adhere to support their normal growth and functions. The adherence to extracellular matrix and/or other cells is critical and adherent cells placed in non-adherent conditions either die or form multicellular spheroids. Placing cells in non-adherent conditions has been used to induce differentiation in teratocarcinoma cells and more recently to form organoids . Because of such important consequences induced by cell adhesion on cell growth and function, the transition between adherent and non-adherent states is rather rare. There are however physiological situations, such as blood cells diapedesis, during which cells that circulate into the blood stream must adhere to the endothelial cells and cross the endothelial barrier to reach target tissues. Another example of transition, from an adherent to a non-adherent state, is observed in the metastasic process, where cells detach from the tumor mass and circulate in the blood and lymphatic vasculature prior to reattaching and extravasating to colonize distant organs. The comparative analysis of the only effects of adherence on cellular functions is complicated by the fact that in many study models the acquisition or loss of adherence induces major alterations in cell physiology that would obscure the effects of the adherence itself. For example, P19 teratocarcinoma cells differentiate in suspension spheroids while they do not in adhering conditions. In this context, the comparison between spheroids and adherent cells would not be a comparison between adherent and non-adherent cells, but between differentiated cells adhering between them and undifferentiated cells adhering on plastic. Mouse macrophage cell lines represent one of the rare experimental models that may be suitable to compare the adherent and non-adherent states. Indeed, they grow equally well under adherent and non-adherent conditions and keep their differentiated functions under both conditions. We therefore decided to use this model to analyze the changes between the adherent and the non-adherent state using a broad approach, based on proteomics.

INSTRUMENT(S): maXis, TripleTOF 5600, Synapt MS

ORGANISM(S): Mus Musculus (mouse)

TISSUE(S): Cell Culture, Macrophage

SUBMITTER: Hélène Diemer  

LAB HEAD: Sarah CIANFERANI

PROVIDER: PXD021593 | Pride | 2021-09-09

REPOSITORIES: Pride

Dataset's files

Source:
Action DRS
F001868.dat Other
F001871.dat Other
F006608.dat Other
F006616.dat Other
F006654.dat Other
Items per page:
1 - 5 of 461
altmetric image

Publications

A proteomic-informed view of the changes induced by loss of cellular adherence: The example of mouse macrophages.

Ramirez Rios Sacnite S   Torres Anaelle A   Diemer Hélène H   Collin-Faure Véronique V   Cianférani Sarah S   Lafanechère Laurence L   Rabilloud Thierry T  

PloS one 20210528 5


Except cells circulating in the bloodstream, most cells in vertebrates are adherent. Studying the repercussions of adherence per se in cell physiology is thus very difficult to carry out, although it plays an important role in cancer biology, e.g. in the metastasis process. In order to study how adherence impacts major cell functions, we used a murine macrophage cell line. Opposite to the monocyte/macrophage system, where adherence is associated with the acquisition of differentiated functions,  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

2013-06-27 | E-GEOD-47870 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2014-02-01 | E-GEOD-52705 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2024-11-25 | PXD033531 | Pride
2024-11-25 | PXD033510 | Pride
2010-01-01 | E-GEOD-19713 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2008-06-16 | E-GEOD-8527 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2009-09-15 | E-GEOD-14230 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2015-03-30 | PXD000728 | Pride
2024-01-26 | PXD043220 | Pride
2013-11-30 | E-GEOD-26527 | biostudies-arrayexpress