Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Genomic paired-end reads of Saccharomyces bayanus CBS 380

ABSTRACT: Paired-end sequencing of the genomic DNA of Saccharomyces bayanus CBS 380

PROVIDER: PRJEB14883 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	ERR1544719_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR1544719_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 2 of 2

Similar Datasets

Paired end protocol test

Project description:Paired end protocol test

| PRJEB2279 | ENA

mice feces Illumina Miseq paired-end reads

Project description:mice feces Illumina Miseq paired-end reads Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA1012556 | ENA

Primula vulgaris genome project paired-end sequencing reads

Project description:Primula vulgaris genome project paired-end sequencing reads

| PRJEB21011 | ENA

Saccharomyces bayanus strain:CBS 7001

Project description:Saccharomyces bayanus strain:CBS 7001

| PRJNA245729 | ENA

Differentially expressed genes from RNA-Seq and functional enrichment results are affected by the choice of single-end versus paired-end reads and stranded versus non-stranded protocols

Project description:We undertook four mammalian transcriptomics experiments to compare the effect of read mapping, feature counting and differential expression analysis using single-end (SE) and paired-end (PE) protocols. For three of these experiments we also compared a non-stranded (NS) and a strand-specific approach to mapping the paired-end data.

2017-06-09 | GSE97471 | GEO

Paired-end RNA-seq in HepG2 cells

Project description:Paired-end RNA-seq in HepG2 cells

| PRJNA547628 | ENA

Zebrafish Paired End DiTag libraries

Project description:Used a DNA tag sequencing and mapping strategy called gene identification signature (GIS) analysis, in which 5' and 3' signatures of full-length cDNAs are accurately extracted into paired-end ditags (PETs) that are concatenated for efficient sequencing and mapped to genome sequences to demarcate the transcription boundaries of every gene. GIS analysis is potentially 30-fold more efficient than standard cDNA sequencing approaches for transcriptome characterization. Keywords: Paired End DiTags

2008-12-01 | GSE6694 | GEO

Accurate indel prediction using paired-end short reads.

Project description:BACKGROUND: One of the major open challenges in next generation sequencing (NGS) is the accurate identification of structural variants such as insertions and deletions (indels). Current methods for indel calling assign scores to different types of evidence or counter-evidence for the presence of an indel, such as the number of split read alignments spanning the boundaries of a deletion candidate or reads that map within a putative deletion. Candidates with a score above a manually defined threshold are then predicted to be true indels. As a consequence, structural variants detected in this manner contain many false positives. RESULTS: Here, we present a machine learning based method which is able to discover and distinguish true from false indel candidates in order to reduce the false positive rate. Our method identifies indel candidates using a discriminative classifier based on features of split read alignment profiles and trained on true and false indel candidates that were validated by Sanger sequencing. We demonstrate the usefulness of our method with paired-end Illumina reads from 80 genomes of the first phase of the 1001 Genomes Project ( http://www.1001genomes.org) in Arabidopsis thaliana. CONCLUSION: In this work we show that indel classification is a necessary step to reduce the number of false positive candidates. We demonstrate that missing classification may lead to spurious biological interpretations. The software is available at: http://agkb.is.tuebingen.mpg.de/Forschung/SV-M/.

| S-EPMC3614465 | biostudies-other

Saccharomyces bayanus strain:CBS 7001

Project description:Saccharomyces bayanus CBS 7001 TnSeq 10 samples

| PRJNA262204 | ENA

Short paired-end reads trump long single-end reads for expression analysis.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Typical experimental design advice for expression analyses using RNA-seq generally assumes that single-end reads provide robust gene-level expression estimates in a cost-effective manner, and that the additional benefits obtained from paired-end sequencing are not worth the additional cost. However, in many cases (e.g., with Illumina NextSeq and NovaSeq instruments), shorter paired-end reads and longer single-end reads can be generated for the same cost, and it is not obvious which strategy should be preferred. Using publicly available data, we test whether short-paired end reads can achieve more robust expression estimates and differential expression results than single-end reads of approximately the same total number of sequenced bases. RESULTS:At both the transcript and gene levels, 2?×?40 paired-end reads unequivocally provide expression estimates that are more highly correlated with 2?×?125 than 1?×?75 reads; in nearly all cases, those correlations are also greater than for 1?×?125, despite the greater total number of sequenced bases for the latter. Across an array of metrics, differential expression tests based upon 2?×?40 consistently outperform those using 1?×?75. CONCLUSION:Researchers seeking a cost-effective approach for gene-level expression analysis should prefer short paired-end reads over a longer single-end strategy. Short paired-end reads will also give reasonably robust expression estimates and differential expression results at the isoform level.

| S-EPMC7168855 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data