Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

ABSTRACT: Comparison of extraction methods for recovering ancient microbial DNA from paleofeces

PROVIDER: PRJEB33577 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	ERR3678600_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR3678600_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR3678610_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR3678610_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR3678620_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 72

Similar Datasets

human gut metagenome

Project description:Comparison of microbial DNA extraction methods for clinical applications

| PRJDB7617 | ENA

Homo sapiens

Project description:Comparison of extraction methods on ancient samples from tropical environments

| PRJNA398385 | ENA

Project description:Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling

| PRJEB20983 | ENA

Project description:Comparison of three DNA extraction methods for recovery of microbial DNA from Arctic permafrost

| PRJNA954778 | ENA

The effects from DNA extraction methods on the evaluation of microbial diversity associated with human colonic tissue

Project description:Recent advances in (meta)genomic methods have provided new opportunities to examine host-microbe-environment interactions in the human gut. While opportunities exist to extract DNA from freshly sourced colonic tissue there are potentially valuable sources of DNA from historical studies that might also be examined. We examined how four different tissue DNA extraction methods employed in past clinical trials might impact the recovery of microbial DNA from a colonic tissue sample as assessed using a custom designed phylogenetic microarray for human gut bacteria and archaebacteria. While all methods of DNA extraction produced similar phylogenetic profiles some extraction specific biases were also observed. Real time PCR analysis targeting several bacterial groups substantiated this observation. These data suggest that while the efficacy of different DNA extraction methods differs somewhat all the methods tested produce an accurate representation of microbial diversity. This suggests that DNA samples archived in biobanks should be suitable for retrospective analyses.

2010-01-01 | GSE18420 | GEO

Project description:Comparison of DNA extraction methods for long-read mNGS testing

| PRJNA824617 | ENA

Project description:Comparison of DNA Extraction and Amplification methods for Plant-Associated Samples

| PRJNA646931 | ENA

Improving DNA extraction from ancient bones

Project description:Comparing the performance of three ancient DNA extraction methods for high-throughput sequencing

| PRJEB10532 | ENA

Project description:Comparison of Viral Nucleic Acid Extraction methods

| PRJNA470703 | ENA

Project description:DNA extraction kit comparison

| PRJNA925101 | ENA