Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

IlPseTimn

ABSTRACT: Pseudoscada timna, genomic and transcriptomic data

PROVIDER: PRJEB73412 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	ERR12743802_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR12743802_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR12743803_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR12743803_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR12721064.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 6

Similar Datasets

ilPseTimn

Project description:Pseudoscada timna

| PRJEB73413 | ENA

Pseudoscada timna

Project description:Pseudoscada timna overview

| PRJNA1182459 | ENA

ilPseFlor

Project description:Pseudoscada florula, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB77333 | ENA

ilPseFlor

Project description:Pseudoscada florula

| PRJEB77334 | ENA

Pseudoscada florula

Project description:Pseudoscada florula overview

| PRJNA1182014 | ENA

tfGorAlbo

Project description:Gordius_albopunctatus, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB78907 | ENA

Tropheryma whipplei proteome - Analyses of new genomic, transcriptomic or proteomic data commonly result in trashing many unidentified data escaping the ‘canonical’ DNA-RNA-protein scheme

Project description:Analyses of new genomic, transcriptomic or proteomic data commonly result in trashing many unidentified data escaping the ‘canonical’ DNA-RNA-protein scheme. Testing systematic exchanges of nucleotides over long stretches produces inversed RNA pieces (here named “swinger” RNA) differing from their template DNA. These may explain some trashed data. Here analyses of genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data of the pathogenic Tropheryma whipplei according to canonical genomic, transcriptomic and translational 'rules' resulted in trashing 58.9% of DNA, 37.7% RNA and about 85% of mass spectra (corresponding to peptides). In the trash, we found numerous DNA/RNA fragments compatible with “swinger” polymerization. Genomic sequences covered by «swinger» DNA and RNA are 3X more frequent than expected by chance and explained 12.4 and 20.8% of the rejected DNA and RNA sequences, respectively. As for peptides, several match with “swinger” RNAs, including some chimera, translated from both regular, and «swinger» transcripts, notably for ribosomal RNAs. Congruence of DNA, RNA and peptides resulting from the same swinging process suggest that systematic nucleotide exchanges increase coding potential, and may add to evolutionary diversification of bacterial populations.

2017-12-18 | PXD006238 | Pride

drHydVulg

Project description:Hydrocotyle vulgaris, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB74170 | ENA

qmAlpBalt

Project description:Alpioniscus balthasari, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB76557 | ENA

daGyrOppo

Project description:Gyrocaryum oppositifolium, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB76563 | ENA