Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

IhNeoLine

ABSTRACT: Neophilaenus lineatus, genomic and transcriptomic data

PROVIDER: PRJEB79815 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	ERR13660030.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR13660031.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR13654266_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR13654266_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 4 of 4

Similar Datasets

icAgrLine

Project description:Agriotes lineatus, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB73670 | ENA

xgPhoLine

Project description:Phorcus lineatus (thick top shell), genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB48392 | ENA

Agriotes lineatus

Project description:Agriotes lineatus (lined click beetle) genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJNA1079412 | ENA

icSitLine

Project description:Sitona lineatus (pea leaf weevil), genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB77502 | ENA

tfGorAlbo

Project description:Gordius_albopunctatus, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB78907 | ENA

Tropheryma whipplei proteome - Analyses of new genomic, transcriptomic or proteomic data commonly result in trashing many unidentified data escaping the ‘canonical’ DNA-RNA-protein scheme

Project description:Analyses of new genomic, transcriptomic or proteomic data commonly result in trashing many unidentified data escaping the ‘canonical’ DNA-RNA-protein scheme. Testing systematic exchanges of nucleotides over long stretches produces inversed RNA pieces (here named “swinger” RNA) differing from their template DNA. These may explain some trashed data. Here analyses of genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data of the pathogenic Tropheryma whipplei according to canonical genomic, transcriptomic and translational 'rules' resulted in trashing 58.9% of DNA, 37.7% RNA and about 85% of mass spectra (corresponding to peptides). In the trash, we found numerous DNA/RNA fragments compatible with “swinger” polymerization. Genomic sequences covered by «swinger» DNA and RNA are 3X more frequent than expected by chance and explained 12.4 and 20.8% of the rejected DNA and RNA sequences, respectively. As for peptides, several match with “swinger” RNAs, including some chimera, translated from both regular, and «swinger» transcripts, notably for ribosomal RNAs. Congruence of DNA, RNA and peptides resulting from the same swinging process suggest that systematic nucleotide exchanges increase coding potential, and may add to evolutionary diversification of bacterial populations.

2017-12-18 | PXD006238 | Pride

Labeo lineatus

Project description:Labeo lineatus

| PRJNA1175243 | ENA

icAgrLine

Project description:Agriotes lineatus

| PRJEB73671 | ENA

ihNeoLine

Project description:Neophilaenus lineatus

| PRJEB79816 | ENA

Buteo lineatus

Project description:Buteo lineatus