Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

IdCalRufa

ABSTRACT: Callicera rufa, genomic and transcriptomic data

PROVIDER: PRJEB80105 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	ERR13670055_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR13670055_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR13698291.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 3 of 3

Similar Datasets

iyForRufa

Project description:Formica rufa, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB70636 | ENA

xgDauRufa

Project description:Daudebardia rufa, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB78924 | ENA

icCanRufa

Project description:Cantharis rufa, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB56057 | ENA

lpBlyRufa

Project description:Blysmopsis rufa, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB81000 | ENA

icCocRufa

Project description:Coccidula rufa (red marsh ladybird), genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB74686 | ENA

tfGorAlbo

Project description:Gordius_albopunctatus, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB78907 | ENA

Tropheryma whipplei proteome - Analyses of new genomic, transcriptomic or proteomic data commonly result in trashing many unidentified data escaping the ‘canonical’ DNA-RNA-protein scheme

Project description:Analyses of new genomic, transcriptomic or proteomic data commonly result in trashing many unidentified data escaping the ‘canonical’ DNA-RNA-protein scheme. Testing systematic exchanges of nucleotides over long stretches produces inversed RNA pieces (here named “swinger” RNA) differing from their template DNA. These may explain some trashed data. Here analyses of genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data of the pathogenic Tropheryma whipplei according to canonical genomic, transcriptomic and translational 'rules' resulted in trashing 58.9% of DNA, 37.7% RNA and about 85% of mass spectra (corresponding to peptides). In the trash, we found numerous DNA/RNA fragments compatible with “swinger” polymerization. Genomic sequences covered by «swinger» DNA and RNA are 3X more frequent than expected by chance and explained 12.4 and 20.8% of the rejected DNA and RNA sequences, respectively. As for peptides, several match with “swinger” RNAs, including some chimera, translated from both regular, and «swinger» transcripts, notably for ribosomal RNAs. Congruence of DNA, RNA and peptides resulting from the same swinging process suggest that systematic nucleotide exchanges increase coding potential, and may add to evolutionary diversification of bacterial populations.

2017-12-18 | PXD006238 | Pride

idHydCyrt

Project description:Hydrotaea cyrtoneurina, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB56363 | ENA

idEusHist

Project description:Eustalomyia histrio, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB57279 | ENA

idTheSoli

Project description:Thelaira solivaga, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB57307 | ENA