Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

DrAmmMaju

ABSTRACT: Ammi majus, genomic and transcriptomic data

PROVIDER: PRJEB80203 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	ERR13698317.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR13698318.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR13702771_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR13702771_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 4 of 4

Similar Datasets

drAmmMaju

Project description:Ammi majus

| PRJEB80204 | ENA

Comparative analysis of the root and leaf transcriptomes in Chelidonium majus L.

Project description:To understand the biosynthesis of C. majus BIAs, we performed de novo transcriptome sequencing of leaf and root tissues of C. majus using Illumina high-throughput sequencing technology.

2018-07-20 | GSE117393 | GEO

Trachyspermum ammi

Project description:Trachyspermum ammi overview

| PRJNA628776 | ENA

tfGorAlbo

Project description:Gordius_albopunctatus, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB78907 | ENA

Tropheryma whipplei proteome - Analyses of new genomic, transcriptomic or proteomic data commonly result in trashing many unidentified data escaping the ‘canonical’ DNA-RNA-protein scheme

Project description:Analyses of new genomic, transcriptomic or proteomic data commonly result in trashing many unidentified data escaping the ‘canonical’ DNA-RNA-protein scheme. Testing systematic exchanges of nucleotides over long stretches produces inversed RNA pieces (here named “swinger” RNA) differing from their template DNA. These may explain some trashed data. Here analyses of genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data of the pathogenic Tropheryma whipplei according to canonical genomic, transcriptomic and translational 'rules' resulted in trashing 58.9% of DNA, 37.7% RNA and about 85% of mass spectra (corresponding to peptides). In the trash, we found numerous DNA/RNA fragments compatible with “swinger” polymerization. Genomic sequences covered by «swinger» DNA and RNA are 3X more frequent than expected by chance and explained 12.4 and 20.8% of the rejected DNA and RNA sequences, respectively. As for peptides, several match with “swinger” RNAs, including some chimera, translated from both regular, and «swinger» transcripts, notably for ribosomal RNAs. Congruence of DNA, RNA and peptides resulting from the same swinging process suggest that systematic nucleotide exchanges increase coding potential, and may add to evolutionary diversification of bacterial populations.

2017-12-18 | PXD006238 | Pride

Trachyspermum ammi

Project description:Trachyspermum ammi Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA362991 | ENA

Ophiocytium majus

Project description:Ophiocytium majus

| PRJNA894617 | ENA

ilPolSura

Project description:Polyommatus surakovi, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB64727 | ENA

ilCerTuti

Project description:Ceratinia tutia, genomic and transcriptomic data