Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

PCR-free library preparation

ABSTRACT: A method for PCR-free library preparation for sequencing palaeogenomes

PROVIDER: PRJEB83706 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	ERR14375900.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR14375901.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR14375902.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR14375903.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR14375904.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 28

Similar Datasets

Controlled library preparation of STR-bearing minigenes at three amplification time-points

Project description:We have designed a method for direct measurement of in vitro noise. Using a synthetic STR sequencing library, we have measured the stutter patterns at various levels of PCR amplification during targeted amplification and library preparation processes

2019-01-26 | E-MTAB-7602 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Splinted Ligation Adapter Tagging, a novel library preparation for whole genome bisulphite sequencing

Project description:Library preparation for whole genome bisulphite sequencing (WGBS) is challenging due to side effects of the bisulphite treatment, which leads to extensive DNA damage. Recently, a new generation of methods for bisulphite sequencing library preparation have been devised. They are based on initial bisulphite treatment of the DNA, followed by adaptor tagging of single stranded DNA fragments, and enable WGBS using low quantities of input DNA. In this study, we present a novel approach for quick and cost effective WGBS library preparation that is based on splinted adaptor tagging (SPLAT) of bisulphite-converted single-stranded DNA. Moreover, we validate SPLAT against three commercially available WGBS library preparation techniques, two of which are based on bisulphite treatment prior to adaptor tagging and one is a conventional WGBS method.

2016-10-27 | GSE89213 | GEO

NSG library preparation for insects

Project description:A fast and inexpensive plate-based NGS library preparation method for insect genomics

| PRJEB65580 | ENA

Evaluation of three small RNA library preparation kits on serum-derived RNA

Project description:We evaluated the effect of the small RNA library preparation method on 5' tRNA-halves and miRNA abundance in libraries prepared from serum RNA using three commercially available small RNA library preparation kits (TruSeq small RNA library preparation kit v2 (Illumina), TailorMix miRNA sample preparation kit v2 (Seqmatic) and the NEBNext Multiplex Small RNA library prep kit (New England Biolabs)). RNA isolated from 100 µl of serum collected from healthy mice was used as input for the preparation of a small RNA library in duplicate and libraries were single end sequenced.

2017-02-22 | GSE88914 | GEO

Comparison of whole-genome bisulfite sequencing library preparation strategies identifies sources of biases affecting DNA methylation data

Project description:We performed a parallel analysis of commonly used pre- and post-bisulfite WGBS library preparation protocols for their performance and quality of sequencing outputs. Our results show that bisulfite conversion per se generates pronounced sequencing biases, and subsequent fragmentation and amplification steps lead to several-fold overrepresentation of these artefacts. Standard pre-bisulfite library preparation methods lead to a significantly biased genomic sequence representation and a marked overestimation of methylation levels. We have integrated a bias diagnostic tool in the Bismark package and propose that amplification-free and post-bisulfite procedures should become the gold standard for WGBS library preparation.

2017-02-16 | GSE77961 | GEO

Limitations and possibilities of small RNA digital gene expression profiling: library preparation comparison (SOLiD)

Project description:Analysis of RNA samples by massive parallel sequencing holds the promise to assay gene expression in both a quantitative and qualitative fashion and therefore allows for digital gene expression (DGE) profiling. We assessed the effect of different experimental approaches by generating small RNA libraries from a biological sample as well as an equimolar pool of synthetic miRNAs and analyzed the results using capillary dideoxy sequencing and next-generation sequencing platforms (Roche/454, AB/SOLiD and Illumina/Solexa). Whereas different sequencing platforms provided highly similar results, large differences in DGE profiles were observed depending on the library preparation method used. Nevertheless, our results indicate that the preferential nature of the library preparation methods is systematic and highly reproducible and we show that DGE is well suited for the quantification of relative expression differences between samples. Keywords: Transcriptome analysis Examination of three different library preparation methods for small RNAs, two replicates per library method

2009-07-28 | E-GEOD-16370 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Limitations and possibilities of small RNA digital gene expression profiling: library preparation comparison (454)

2009-07-28 | E-GEOD-16369 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Library preparation Pool-seq

Project description:Evaluating different library preparation methods for Pool-seq

| PRJEB8948 | ENA

Tn5 transposase-mediated library preparation of single-cell cDNAs for RNA-seq

Project description:Deep sequencing of single cell-derived genomic DNA and/or cDNAs brings novel insights into oncogenesis and embryogenesis. However, traditional library preparation for RNA-Seq requires multiple steps, including shearing the target DNA/RNA and following sequential enzymatic reactions, which result in consequent sample loss and stochastic variation at each step. Such variation may significantly affect the output from sequencing. We have found that a new technique of library preparation using hyperactive Tn5 transposase for the next-generation sequencer of Illumina's platform provided high-quality libraries from 100ng of short-length (average 700~800 bp) single-cell level cDNA. This new method reduced the number of steps in the protocol, which resulted in improved reproducibility and reduced variation among the specimens. Two methods of library preparation (sonication, tagmentation with hyperactive Tn5 transposase) were compared in the case of RNA-Seq for single-cell level cDNA. Technical triplicates were used.

2012-05-25 | E-GEOD-38198 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Tn5 transposase-mediated library preparation of single-cell cDNAs for RNA-seq

2012-05-25 | GSE38198 | GEO