In vitro differentiation of M1, M2, and TAM-like macrophages from healthy donor PBMC
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA1016482 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:To understand the immunological role of different macrophage populations in the tumor, we generated transcriptional profiles of macrophages differentiated from PBMC-derived monocytes in vitro under three conditions to compare with: M1-like macrophages were developed in vitro through polarization of human monocytes by IFNg and TLR4 stimulation. This population is considered to have anti-tumor activities; releasing proinflammatory cytokines, performing phagocytosis, and possessing antigen cross presentation abilities. Second, M2-like macrophages were developed in vitro through intensive IL4 stimulation of monocytes. M2 macrophages are known to promote many pro-tumorigenic processes such as angiogenesis, immune suppression, hypoxia induction, tumor cell proliferation, metastasis. Lastly, we deployed a third population that represents a better in vitro model for tumor associated macrophages (TAM), developed under conditions better resembling the TME.Monoctyes derived from two individual patient donors were cultured separately under four (4) different conditions in vitro, for a total of eight (8) samples to be processed for bulk RNA sequencing.
2023-09-18 | GSE243175 | GEO
Project description:In order to assess whether differences in the transcriptomic profile of human tumor-associated macrophages vs. alveolar macrophages from adjacent non-tumor-tissue (GSE162669) were caused by factors secreted by tumor cells, primary human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) were polarized towards a TAM-like phenotype by cultivating them in tumor cell-conditioned medium. A genome-wide comparison by bulk RNA-Seq confirmed a high similarity of ex vivo TAMs and in vitro polarized TAM-like macrophages. Other polarization schemes (M1: LPS/IFN-gamma, M2: IL10 or IL4) did not lead to similar transcriptomic changes. For details, see Hoppstädter et al., 2021 (doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103578).
2021-09-25 | GSE162698 | GEO
Project description:Differentially polarized human monocyte-derived macrophages (M0, M1, M2/IL10, M2/IL4, TAM-like)
| PRJNA682629 | ENA
Project description:Macrophages have distinct characteristics depending on their microenvironment. We performed proteomic analysis between M1 and M2 macrophages and found that cellular metabolism is the key regulator of macrophage function. We used microarray to support proteomic data between M1 and M2 macrophages. M1 macrophages are obtained using cell sorting of CD45+MHCII+CD8a-F4/80+ population from C57BL/6J bone marrow cell derived heterogenous cells under GM-CSF conditioning for 7 days. M2 macrophages are differentiated with 20% L929 cell supernatant for 7 days and sorted from CD45+F4/80+CD11b+ population.
2014-11-14 | E-GEOD-63245 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We compare M1 and M2 stimuli in human macrophages. Total RNA obtained from autologous serum monocyte-derived macrophages exposed to key cytokines, Lps, Glucocorticoid receptor ligand or left untreated.
2014-01-03 | E-GEOD-51446 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Macrophages have distinct characteristics depending on their microenvironment. We performed proteomic analysis between M1 and M2 macrophages and found that cellular metabolism is the key regulator of macrophage function. We used microarray to support proteomic data between M1 and M2 macrophages.
2014-11-14 | GSE63245 | GEO
Project description:We reported exosome-guided phenotype switches between M1- and M2-polarized BMDMs. M1- or M2-polarized BMDMs were successfully reprogrammed to M2- or M1-phenotype via the treatment of exosomes obtained from M2- or M1-polarized BMDMs. In this uploaded information, the exosomes from M1- and M2-polarized BMDMs were analyzed by high-throughput sequencing.
2022-03-02 | GSE179172 | GEO
Project description:Primary human M1 and M2 macrophages were transfected with different human herpesvirus-derived viral miRNA and the impact on the cellular microRNAs was profiled using microarray. Viral miRNA-mediated impact was assessed on the host cellular microRNA profiles by miRNA microarray analysis. Five different viral miRNA representing 4 different human herpesviruses were overexpressed in M1 and M2 macrophages and the changes in cellular miRNA compared to control mimic were examined. Viral miRNA exhibit unique impact on M1 and M2 miRNA profiles.
2022-05-31 | GSE150146 | GEO
Project description:Classically (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) macrophages play distinct roles in various physiological and disease processes. Understanding the gene transcription programs that contribute to macrophage polarization along the M1/M2 spectrum may lead to new tools to detect and therapeutically manipulate macrophage phenotype. Here, we define the M1 and M2 macrophage signature through mRNA microarray. The M1 macrophage signature was defined by 629 up-regulated and 732 down-regulated genes while the M2 macrophage signature was formed by 388 up-regulated and 425 down-regulated genes. While a subset of probes was common to both M1 and M2 cells, others were exclusive to each macrophage subset. The common M1/M2 pathways were characterized by changes in various transcriptional regulators and signaling partners, including increases in Kruppel-like Factor (Klf) 4, but decreases in Klf2. To identify M1 and M2 biomarkers that help discriminate these populations, we selected genes that were increased during M1 or M2 differentiation but decreased in the opposite population. Among top novel M1-distinct genes, we identified CD38, G-protein coupled receptor 18 (Gpr18) and Formyl peptide receptor 2 (Fpr2). Among top M2 genes, we found early growth response protein 2 (Egr2) and Myc. We validated these genes by Real-Time PCR and developed a CD38/Egr2-based flow cytometry assay that discriminates between M1 and M2 macrophages. Overall, this work defines the M1 and M2 signature and identifies several novel M1 and M2 genes that may be used to distinguish and manipulate M1 and M2 macrophages. Total RNA was prepared from bone marrow-derived macrophages of wild-type mice (n=2-3 independent mice) treated in M0, M1 or M2 conditions (n=2-3 replicates per condition originating from different mice)
2015-12-08 | E-GEOD-69607 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Analysis of the effects of CNI-1493 treatment on M1 and M2 polarized macrophages. The purpose of this microarray is to identify genes that may be differentially expressed in M1 or M2 macrophages after treatment with CNI-1493. CNI-1493 is a known inhibitor of M1 macrophages but details of its molecular mechanism are unknown. The effect of CNI-1493 on M2 macrophages has yet to be explored, but we hypothesize that CNI-1493 treatment will attenuate pro-tumor properties of M2 macrophages. We demonstrate with this array that known macrophage markers are unchanged after treatment with CNI-1493, indicating that CNI-1493 does not change the macrophage phenotype on a transcriptional level. Additionally, no candidate genes to suggest how CNI-1493 may attenuate the pro-tumor effects of M2 macrophages are readily identifiable. Total RNA extracted from M1 or M2 macrophages after polarization with GM-CSF (25ng/ml) or M-CSF (25ng/ml) for 7 days, followed by addition of IFN-γ (20ng/ml) and LPS (100ng/ml) or IL-4 (40ng/ml) for 18 hours, respectively, from CD14+ human PBMCs, and treated with CNI-1493 (200nM)
2015-03-12 | E-GEOD-66805 | biostudies-arrayexpress