Immunosuppressive inflammation driven by LPS/TLR4 signalling in hepatocellular carcinoma with low immune cell infiltration
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA1044414 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:Non-inflamed liver tumors (i.e. immunologically silent and desert phenotype) account for two-thirds of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and represent a major challenge for immune-based cancer therapies. Elucidating the factors behind the lack of T cell response would enable us to define an appropriate therapy to induce antitumor immunity based on tumor immunobiology. We applied unsupervised machine learning to the transcriptome of a rigorously selected set of non- or poorly infiltrated HCC, identified independent modular components and explored their characteristics through gene enrichment analysis and integration of molecular, cytometric, immunohistochemical and clinicopathological data. Here we demonstrate that non-/poorly infiltrated HCC (referred to as cold HCC) exhibits intricate, multi-layered mechanisms by which tumors evade the immune response. These include the recruitment of immunosuppres-sive myeloid cells into the tumor microenvironment (TME) in relation to tumor richness in Gram-negative bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and activation of the LPS/TLR4 signaling pathway. LPS-containing cold HCCs undergo immunosuppressive inflammation, likely via activation of the EGFR, LPS/TLR4 and NFKB signaling pathways. This is associated with increased expression of the checkpoint inhibitor TIM3 and its ligand, galectin 9 (Gal9). All the immune evasion factors detected in cold HCC are also at play in infiltrated HCC, suggesting in the latter the presence of TME regulatory signals opposing them. This study highlights mechanisms of immune tolerance in non-infiltrated HCC and supports the role of tumor ex-trinsic mechanisms in regulating tumor immunity in HCC.
2024-11-20 | GSE248516 | GEO
Project description:Siglec-E is a murine CD33-related siglec that functions as an inhibitory receptor and is expressed mainly on neutrophils and macrophage populations. Recent studies have suggested that siglec-E is an important negative regulator of LPS-TLR4 signalling and one report (Wu et al 2016) claimed that siglec-E is required for TLR4 endocytosis following uptake of Escherichia coli by macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs). Our attempts to reproduce these observations using cells from wildtype (WT) and siglec E deficient mice were unsuccessful. We used a variety of assays to determine if siglec-E expressed by different macrophage populations can regulate TLR-4 signalling in response to LPS, but found no consistent differences in cytokine secretion in vitro and in vivo, comparing 3 different strains of siglec-E-deficient mice with matched WT controls. No evidence was found that the siglec-E deficiency was compensated by expression of siglecs-F and –G, the other murine inhibitory CD33-related siglecs. Quantitative proteomics was used as an unbiased approach and provided additional evidence that siglec-E does not suppress inflammatory TLR4 signaling. Interestingly, proteomics revealed a siglec E dependent alteration in macrophage phenotype that could be relevant to functional responses in host defence. In support of this, siglec-E-deficient mice exhibited enhanced growth of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in the liver following intravenous infection, but macrophages lacking siglec-E did not show altered uptake or killing of bacteria in vitro. Using various cell types including bone marrow derived DCs (BMDC), splenic DCs and macrophages from WT and siglec-E-deficient mice, we showed that siglec-E is not required for TLR4 endocytosis following E.coli uptake or LPS challenge. We failed to see expression of siglec-E by BMDC even after LPS-induced maturation, but confirmed previous studies that splenic DCs express low levels of siglec-E. Taken together, our findings do not support a major role of siglec-E in regulation of TLR4 signalling functions or TLR4 endocytosis in macrophages or DCs. Instead, they reveal that induction of siglec-E by LPS can modulate the phenotype of macrophages, the functional significance of which is currently unclear.
2018-02-09 | PXD008406 | Pride
Project description:TLR4 signaling of LPS chemotypes
| PRJNA1054506 | ENA
Project description:Lipid A (a hexaacylated 1,4 bis-phosphate) is a potent immune stimulant for TLR4/MD-2. Upon lipid A ligation, the TLR4/MD-2 complex dimerizes and initiates signal transduction. Historically, studies also suggested the existence of TLR4/MD-2-independent LPS signaling. Here we define the role of TLR4 and MD-2 in LPS signaling by using genome wide expression profiling in TLR4- and MD-2-deficient macrophages after stimulations with peptidoglycan-free LPS and synthetic E.coli lipid A. Of the 1,396 genes found significantly induced or repressed by any one of the treatments in the wildtype macrophages, none was present in the TLR4- or MD-2-deficient macrophages, confirming that the TLR4/MD-2 complex is the only receptor for endotoxin, and are both absolutely required for responses to LPS. Using a molecular genetics approach, we investigated the mechanism of TLR4/MD-2 activation by combining the known crystal structure of TLR4/MD-2 with computer modeling. We used lipid IVa, a defined lipid A mimetic to model the activation of mouse TLR4/MD2. The two phosphates on lipid A were predicted to interact extensively with the two positively charged patches mouse TLR4 according to our dimeric murine TLR4/MD-2/lipid IVa model. These two patches are composed of K263, R337, and K360 (Positive Patch 1), and K367 and R434 (Positive Patch 2). When either Positive Patch was abolished by mutagenesis into Ala, the responses to LPS and lipid A were almost abrogated. Thus, ionic interactions between the two phosphates on lipid A and the two positively charged patches on murine TLR4 appear to be essential for LPS receptor activation.
2011-07-31 | GSE31066 | GEO
Project description:Lipid A (a hexaacylated 1,4 bis-phosphate) is a potent immune stimulant for TLR4/MD-2. Upon lipid A ligation, the TLR4/MD-2 complex dimerizes and initiates signal transduction. Historically, studies also suggested the existence of TLR4/MD-2-independent LPS signaling. Here we define the role of TLR4 and MD-2 in LPS signaling by using genome wide expression profiling in TLR4- and MD-2-deficient macrophages after stimulations with peptidoglycan-free LPS and synthetic E.coli lipid A. Of the 1,396 genes found significantly induced or repressed by any one of the treatments in the wildtype macrophages, none was present in the TLR4- or MD-2-deficient macrophages, confirming that the TLR4/MD-2 complex is the only receptor for endotoxin, and are both absolutely required for responses to LPS. Using a molecular genetics approach, we investigated the mechanism of TLR4/MD-2 activation by combining the known crystal structure of TLR4/MD-2 with computer modeling. We used lipid IVa, a defined lipid A mimetic to model the activation of mouse TLR4/MD2. The two phosphates on lipid A were predicted to interact extensively with the two positively charged patches mouse TLR4 according to our dimeric murine TLR4/MD-2/lipid IVa model. These two patches are composed of K263, R337, and K360 (Positive Patch 1), and K367 and R434 (Positive Patch 2). When either Positive Patch was abolished by mutagenesis into Ala, the responses to LPS and lipid A were almost abrogated. Thus, ionic interactions between the two phosphates on lipid A and the two positively charged patches on murine TLR4 appear to be essential for LPS receptor activation. Bone marrow-derived macrophages were pooled from four individual WT or TLR4-deficient mice and stimulated with either 10 ng LPS /mL, 100 ng lipid A/mL or 10 nM Pam2 for 2 hours and compared to PBS-stimulated control cells. We also compared PBS-stimulated WT cells directly to PBS-stimulated TLR4-deficient cells to compare the basal expression of genes in the two genotypes. This experiment was repeated once in its entirety.
2011-07-30 | E-GEOD-31066 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:How to identify subgroups of PCa patients for immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) remains not fully understood. Basic helix-loop-helix family member e22 (Bhlhe22) is upregulated in bone metastatic PCa and drives an immunosuppressive bone TME. Tumoral Bhlhe22 mediates the high expression of colony stimulating factor 2 (CSF2), which results in the infiltration of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and prolonged immunocompromised T cell status. Here, we reveal the immunosuppressive mechanism of tumoral Bhlhe22 and provide a prospective ICT combination therapeutic for Bhlhe22+ PCa patients.
2022-11-18 | GSE201381 | GEO
Project description:How to identify subgroups of PCa patients for immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) remains not fully understood. Basic helix-loop-helix family member e22 (Bhlhe22) is upregulated in bone metastatic PCa and drives an immunosuppressive bone TME. Tumoral Bhlhe22 mediates the high expression of colony stimulating factor 2 (CSF2), which results in the infiltration of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and prolonged immunocompromised T cell status. Here, we reveal the immunosuppressive mechanism of tumoral Bhlhe22 and provide a prospective ICT combination therapeutic for Bhlhe22+ PCa patients.
2022-11-18 | GSE206108 | GEO
Project description:Among the diseases caused by Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) abnormal activation by bacterial endotoxin, sepsis is the most dangerous one. The reprogramming of macrophages plays a crucial role in orchestrating the pathogenesis of sepsis. However, the precise mechanism underlying TLR4 activation in macrophages remained incompletely understood. Our studies revealed that upon lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation, CREB-binding protein (CBP) was recruited to the TLR4 signalosome complex and resulted in pronounced acetylation in the TIR domains of TLR4, Myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) and MyD88 adapter-like (MAL), which significantly enhanced the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway and polarization of M1 macrophages. In sepsis patients, significantly elevated TLR4-TIR acetylation was detected in CD16+ monocytes combined with elevated expression of M1 macrophage markers and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. In contrast, histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) served as a key deacetylase in the deacetylation of the TIR domain complex. The inhibition of HDAC1 accelerated sepsis-associated syndromes, while the inhibition of CBP alleviated this process. Overall, our findings highlighted the crucial role of TIR domain complex acetylation in the regulation of inflammatory immune response and suggested that the reversible acetylation of the complex emerged as a promising therapeutic target for M1 macrophages during the progression of sepsis.
2024-08-01 | PXD052433 | Pride
Project description:BACKGROUND & AIMS: TLR4 is an innate immune receptor with expression in human skin, keratinocytes as well as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the skin. In the present study we investigate the role of TLR4 as a negative regulator of keratinocyte proliferation. We present here that the expression of TLR4 increased with the differentiation of cultured keratinocytes in a passage-dependent manner or under calcium-rich conditions. Moreover, the down-regulation of TLR4 by specific knockdown increased the proliferation of primary normal, SCC-derived and HaCaT keratinocytes in vitro. In addition, subcutaneously injected HaCaT keratinocytes with shTLR4 formed growing tumors in nude mice. In contrast, we observed lower proliferation and increased migration in vitro of the SCC13 cell line stably overexpressing TLR4 in comparison to SCC13 TLR4 negative cells. In vivo, SCC13 TLR4-overexpressing tumors showed delayed growth in comparison to TLR4 negative tumors. The overexpression of TLR4 in SCC13 tumor cells was followed by phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and JNK and increased expression of ATF3. In gene expression arrays, the overexpression of TLR4 in tumor cells correlated with gene expression of ATF-3, IL-6, CDH13, CXCL-1, and TFPI. In summary, TLR4 negatively regulates the proliferation of primary keratinocytes and its overexpression reduces tumor growth of SCC cells.
2016-11-16 | GSE89856 | GEO
Project description:Diet induced obesity is independent of metabolic endotoxemia, Tlr4 signalling and hypothalamic inflammation
| PRJEB27397 | ENA