Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA1047135 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR27002200_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR27002200_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR27002201_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR27002201_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR27002202_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 68 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Advances in Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) have made available a wealth of information that had previously been inaccessible to researchers and clinicians. NGS has been applied to understand genomic, transcriptomic, and epigenomic changes and gained traction as a significant tool capable of accelerating diagnosis, prognosis, and biomarker discovery. However, these NGS assays have yet to be practical methods for patient stratification or diagnosis because of the gap between the tiny quantities of biomaterials provided by a clinical sample and the large DNA input required by most of these assays. Current library preparation methodologies typically require large input amounts of DNA and a long and complicated manual process. Here we present a microfluidic reactor system for NGS library preparation, capable of reducing the number of pipetting steps significantly, automating much of the process, while supporting extremely low DNA input requirement (10 pg per library). This largely automated technology will allow for low-input preparations of 8 libraries simultaneously while reducing batch to batch variation and operator hands-on time.
2020-01-02 | GSE132786 | GEO
Project description:Evaluating different library preparation methods for Pool-seq
| PRJEB8948 | ENA
Project description:Evaluating bias-reducing protocols for RNA sequencing library preparation
| PRJEB6271 | ENA
Project description:Epigenome constitutes an important layer that regulates gene expression and dynamics during development and diseases. Extensive efforts have been made to develop epigenome profiling methods using a low number of cells and with high throughput. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) is the most important approach for profiling genome-wide epigenetic changes such as histone modifications. In this report, we demonstrate microfluidic ChIPmentation (mu-CM), a microfluidic technology that enables profiling cell samples that individually do not generate enough ChIP DNA for sequencing library preparation. We used a simple microfluidic device to allow 8 samples to be processed simultaneously. The samples were indexed differently using a tagmentation-based approach (ChIPmentation) and then merged for library preparation. Histone modification profile for each individual sample was obtained by demultiplexing the sequencing reads based on the indexes. Our technology allowed profiling 20 cells and is well suited for cell-type-specific studies using low-abundance tissues.
2020-09-22 | GSE152233 | GEO
Project description:Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is fundamental to the current biological and biomedical research. Construction of sequencing library is a key step of NGS. Therefore, various library construction methods have been explored. However, the current methods are still limited by some shortcomings. Results: This study developed a new NGS library construction method, Single strand Adaptor Library Preparation (SALP), by using a novel single strand adaptor (SSA). SSA is a double-stranded oligonucleotide with a 3ʹ overhang of 3 random nucleotides, which can be efficiently ligated to the 3′ end of single strand DNA by T4 DNA ligase. SALP can be started with any denatured DNA fragments such as those sheared by Tn5 tagmentation, enzyme digestion and sonication. When started with Tn5-tagmented chromatin, SALP can overcome a key limitation of ATAC-seq and become a high-throughput NGS library construction method, SALP-seq, which can be used to comparatively characterize the chromatin openness state of multiple cells unbiasly. In this way, this study successfully characterized the comparative chromatin openness states of four different cell lines, including GM12878, HepG2, HeLa and 293T, with SALP-seq. Similarly, this study also successfully characterized the chromatin openness states of HepG2 cells with SALP-seq by using 105 to 500 cells. Conclusions: This study developed a new NGS library construction method, SALP, by using a novel kind of single strand adaptor (SSA), which should has wide applications in the future due to its unique performance.
2018-01-31 | GSE104162 | GEO
Project description:We compare the performance of two library preparation protocols (poly(A) and exome capture) in in vitro degraded RNA samples
2015-08-03 | GSE64113 | GEO
Project description:Studying medulloblastoma, the most common malignant paediatric brain tumour, requires simple yet realistic in vitro models. In this study, we optimised a robust, reliable, three-dimensional (3D) culture method for medulloblastoma able to recapitulate the spatial conformation, cell-cell and cellmatrix interactions that exist in vivo and in patient tumours. We investigated the initial stages of metastatic dissemination using brain-specific hyaluronan hydrogel matrices. In order to perform NGS of SHH medulloblastoma metastasis models, it was essential to extract high quality RNA for library preparation and sequencing. However, RNA isolation from hydrogels proved particularly difficult due to the low yields of RNA obtained. To efficiently utilise our samples, we chose to adopt two NGS technologies: traditional mRNA sequencing, which required at least 100 ng of RNA per sample, and 3' UPX sequencing, a method used for low input samples that sequenced the 3' end of RNA near the poly-A tail. Firstly, RNA was extracted from samples using the NucleoSpin RNA Plus kit (Macherey-Nagel). Following extraction, samples were shipped to QIAGEN Genomic Services (Hilden, Germany) where the subsequent steps of NGS were performed. Quality control of the RNA was performed using the Qubit RNA high sensitivity assay (Invitrogen) which quantified the amount of RNA in each sample. Samples with 100 ng or more of RNA in total were suitable for mRNA NGS. Samples with lower RNA yields were lyophilised and resuspended in a smaller volume of RNase-free water. Another quality control step was performed to quantify the RNA. Samples with an RNA concentration above 1.4 ng/mL were appropriate for 3' UPX NGS. However, samples with a lower RNA concentration were unsuitable for either method of NGS. Following RNA extraction and quantification, libraries were prepared and sequenced. For mRNA NGS, library preparation was carried out using the TruSeq Stranded mRNA library preparation kit. All prepared libraries successfully passed QIAGEN’s internal quality control checks and were subsequently sequenced on a NextSeq 500 Illumina sequencer. Following sequencing, quality control of the sequencing data was performed using FastQC analysis. All samples had high quality scores, indicating good technical performance of the sequencing. For 3' UPX NGS, library preparation was performed using the QIAseq UPX 3' Transcriptome kit. All prepared libraries successfully passed QIAGEN’s internal quality control checks and were sequenced on a NextSeq 500 Illumina sequencer. Following sequencing, FastQC analysis of the sequencing data was performed and all samples were considered suitable for downstream primary and secondary data analysis.
2021-03-06 | E-MTAB-10127 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Microfluidic platform for next-generation sequencing library preparation with low-input samples
| PRJNA548967 | ENA
Project description:Transcriptome analysis via RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has become a standard technique employed across a variety of biological fields of study. This rapid adoption of the RNA-seq approach has been mediated, in part, by the development of various commercial RNA-seq library preparation kits compatible with common next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms. Generally, the essential steps of library preparation such as rRNA depletion and first-strand cDNA synthesis are tailored to a certain group of organisms (e.g. eukaryotes versus prokaryotes) or genomic GC content. Therefore, selection of appropriate commercial products is of crucial importance to capture the transcriptome of interest as closely to the native state as possible without introduction of technical bias. However, researchers rarely have the resources and time to test various commercial RNA-seq kits for their samples. In this work, we report a side-by-side comparison of RNA-seq data from the same Clostridium autoethanogenum input samples obtained using three commercial rRNA removal and strand-specific library construction products by NuGEN Technologies, Qiagen, and Zymo Research, and compare their performance with published data. While all three vendors advertise their products as suitable for prokaryotes, we found significant differences in their performance in terms of rRNA removal, strand-specificity, and, most importantly, transcript abundance distribution profiles. Notably, RNA-seq data obtained with Qiagen products were most similar to published data and delivered the best results in terms of library strandedness and transcript abundance distribution range. Our results highlight the importance of finding appropriate organism-specific workflows and library preparation products for RNA-seq studies.
2022-07-20 | GSE200959 | GEO