Project description:Background: Low back pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide and is frequently attributed to intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration. Though the contributions of the adjacent cartilage endplates (CEP) to IVD degeneration are well documented, the phenotype and functions of the resident CEP cells are critically understudied. To better characterize CEP cell phenotype and possible mechanisms of CEP degeneration, bulk and single-cell RNA-Sequencing of non-degenerated and degenerated CEP cells were performed. Methods: Human lumbar CEP cells from degenerated (Thompson Grade ≥ 4) and non-degenerated (Thompson Grade ≤ 2) discs were expanded for bulk (N=4 non-degenerated, N=4 degenerated) and single-cell (N=1 non-degenerated, N=1 degenerated) RNA-Sequencing. Genes identified from bulk RNA-Sequencing were categorized by function and their expression in non-degenerated and degenerated CEP cells were compared. A PubMed literature review was also performed to determine which genes were previously identified and studied in the CEP, IVD, and other cartilaginous tissues. For single-cell RNA-Sequencing, different cell clusters were resolved using unsupervised clustering and functional annotation. Differential gene expression analysis and Gene Ontology, respectively, were used to compare gene expression and functional enrichment between cell clusters, as well as between non-degenerated and degenerated CEP samples. Results: Bulk RNA-Sequencing revealed 38 genes were significantly upregulated and 15 genes were significantly downregulated in degenerated CEP cells relative to non-degenerated cells (|Fold change| ≥ 1.5). Of these, only 2 genes were previously studied in CEP cells and 31 were previously studied in the IVD and other cartilaginous tissues. Single-cell RNA-Sequencing revealed 11 unique cell clusters, including multiple chondrocyte and progenitor subpopulations with distinct gene expression and functional profiles. Analysis of genes in the bulk RNA-Sequencing dataset showed that progenitor cell clusters from both samples were enriched in “non-degenerated” genes, but not “degenerated” genes. For both bulk- and single-cell analyses, gene expression and pathway enrichment analyses highlighted several pathways that may regulate CEP degeneration, including transcriptional regulation, translational regulation, intracellular transport, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Conclusions: This thorough analysis using RNA-Sequencing methods highlighted numerous differences between non-degenerated and degenerated CEP cells, the phenotypic heterogeneity of CEP cells, and several pathways of interest that may be relevant in CEP degeneration.
Project description:Background: Low back pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide and is frequently attributed to intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration. Though the contributions of the adjacent cartilage endplates (CEP) to IVD degeneration are well documented, the phenotype and functions of the resident CEP cells are critically understudied. To better characterize CEP cell phenotype and possible mechanisms of CEP degeneration, bulk and single-cell RNA-Sequencing of non-degenerated and degenerated CEP cells were performed. Methods: Human lumbar CEP cells from degenerated (Thompson Grade ≥ 4) and non-degenerated (Thompson Grade ≤ 2) discs were expanded for bulk (N=4 non-degenerated, N=4 degenerated) and single-cell (N=1 non-degenerated, N=1 degenerated) RNA-Sequencing. Genes identified from bulk RNA-Sequencing were categorized by function and their expression in non-degenerated and degenerated CEP cells were compared. A PubMed literature review was also performed to determine which genes were previously identified and studied in the CEP, IVD, and other cartilaginous tissues. For single-cell RNA-Sequencing, different cell clusters were resolved using unsupervised clustering and functional annotation. Differential gene expression analysis and Gene Ontology, respectively, were used to compare gene expression and functional enrichment between cell clusters, as well as between non-degenerated and degenerated CEP samples. Results: Bulk RNA-Sequencing revealed 38 genes were significantly upregulated and 15 genes were significantly downregulated in degenerated CEP cells relative to non-degenerated cells (|Fold change| ≥ 1.5). Of these, only 2 genes were previously studied in CEP cells and 31 were previously studied in the IVD and other cartilaginous tissues. Single-cell RNA-Sequencing revealed 11 unique cell clusters, including multiple chondrocyte and progenitor subpopulations with distinct gene expression and functional profiles. Analysis of genes in the bulk RNA-Sequencing dataset showed that progenitor cell clusters from both samples were enriched in “non-degenerated” genes, but not “degenerated” genes. For both bulk- and single-cell analyses, gene expression and pathway enrichment analyses highlighted several pathways that may regulate CEP degeneration, including transcriptional regulation, translational regulation, intracellular transport, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Conclusions: This thorough analysis using RNA-Sequencing methods highlighted numerous differences between non-degenerated and degenerated CEP cells, the phenotypic heterogeneity of CEP cells, and several pathways of interest that may be relevant in CEP degeneration.
2024-01-10 | GSE242040 | GEO
Project description:Frequent sex chromosome turnover in African clawed frogs (Xenopus) provides insights into the origin of new sex chromosomes
Project description:Sex differences in the brain as they relate to health and disease are often overlooked in experimental models. Many neurological disorders, like Alzheimer’s disease (AD), multiple sclerosis (MS), and autism, differ in prevalence between males and females. Sex differences originate either from differential gene expression on sex chromosomes or from hormonal differences, either directly or indirectly. To disentangle the relative contributions of genetic sex (XX v. XY) and gonadal sex (ovaries v. testes) to the regulation of hippocampal sex effects, we use the “sex-reversal” Four Core Genotype (FCG) mouse model which uncouples sex chromosome complement from gonadal sex. Transcriptomic and epigenomic analyses of hippocampal RNA and DNA from ∼12 month old FCG mice, reveals differential regulatory effects of sex chromosome content and gonadal sex on X- versus autosome-encoded gene expression and DNA modification patterns. Gene expression and DNA methylation patterns on the X chromosome were driven primarily by sex chromosome content, not gonadal sex. The majority of DNA methylation changes involved hypermethylation in the XX genotypes (as compared to XY) in the CpG context, with the largest differences in CpG islands, promoters, and CTCF binding sites. Autosomal gene expression and DNA modifications demonstrated regulation by sex chromosome complement and gonadal sex. These data demonstrate the importance of sex chromosomes themselves, independent of hormonal status, in regulating hippocampal sex effects. Future studies will need to further interrogate specific CNS cell types, identify the mechanisms by which sex chromosome regulate autosomes, and differentiate organizational from activational hormonal effects.
Project description:Sex differences in the brain as they relate to health and disease are often overlooked in experimental models. Many neurological disorders, like Alzheimer’s disease (AD), multiple sclerosis (MS), and autism, differ in prevalence between males and females. Sex differences originate either from differential gene expression on sex chromosomes or from hormonal differences, either directly or indirectly. To disentangle the relative contributions of genetic sex (XX v. XY) and gonadal sex (ovaries v. testes) to the regulation of hippocampal sex effects, we use the “sex-reversal” Four Core Genotype (FCG) mouse model which uncouples sex chromosome complement from gonadal sex. Transcriptomic and epigenomic analyses of hippocampal RNA and DNA from ∼12 month old FCG mice, reveals differential regulatory effects of sex chromosome content and gonadal sex on X- versus autosome-encoded gene expression and DNA modification patterns. Gene expression and DNA methylation patterns on the X chromosome were driven primarily by sex chromosome content, not gonadal sex. The majority of DNA methylation changes involved hypermethylation in the XX genotypes (as compared to XY) in the CpG context, with the largest differences in CpG islands, promoters, and CTCF binding sites. Autosomal gene expression and DNA modifications demonstrated regulation by sex chromosome complement and gonadal sex. These data demonstrate the importance of sex chromosomes themselves, independent of hormonal status, in regulating hippocampal sex effects. Future studies will need to further interrogate specific CNS cell types, identify the mechanisms by which sex chromosome regulate autosomes, and differentiate organizational from activational hormonal effects.