Antisense transcription can induce expression memory via stable promoter repression
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA1067135 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR27669151_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR27669151_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR27669152_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR27669152_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR27669153_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 12 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:The capacity of cells to retain a memory of previous signals enables them to adopt unique cell fates and adjust to their surrounding environment. The underlying gene expression memory can arise from mutual repression of two genes, forming a toggle switch. Such mutual repression may occur at antisense loci, where two convergently oriented genes repress each other in cis. Under which conditions antisense transcription can generate expression memory remains poorly understood. To address this question, we combine mathematical modeling, genomics and a synthetic biology approach. Through simulations we show that stable memory can emerge, if both genes in an antisense pair transcribe through the convergent promoter and induce a stable repressive chromatin state. Genome-wide analysis of nascent transcription further supports antisense-mediated promoter repression with promoter-overlapping antisense gene pairs exhibiting mutually exclusive expression. Through constructing a synthetic antisense locus in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) we then show that such a locus architecture can indeed maintain a memory of a transient stimulus. Mutual repression and the capacity for memory formation are elevated, when mESCs differentiate, showing that epigenetic memory is a cell type-specific property. Our finding that stem cells adapt their ability to remember stimuli as they differentiate might help to elucidate how stemness is maintained.
2024-03-11 | GSE253792 | GEO
Project description:Pervasive transcription generates mainly unstable non-coding transcripts. Although a few examples of pervasive antisense have been shown to mediate gene regulation by transcriptional interference, whether pervasive transcription has a general functional role or merely represents transcriptional noise remains to be determined. In a mutant context that revealed pervasive transcripts, we characterized more than 800 antisenses genome wide and analysed the corresponding sense mRNA behaviour. We observed that antisense non-coding transcription is commonly found associated with genes tightly repressed during the exponential phase with an opposite level of mRNA and the associated antisense. This suggested that antisense transcription might participate to a tight repression of genes during the exponential phase. We thus specifically interrupted the antisense transcription of a subset of genes, and found that it resulted in a de-repression of the corresponding mRNAs. We further validated that this repression acts in cis through a transcriptional interference mechanism, which involves several chromatin modification factors. Transcription interference is observed for the first time as a general mean of gene regulation between cellular states.
2018-07-23 | GSE101368 | GEO
Project description:Stochastic activation of clustered Protocadherin (Pcdh) α, β, and γ genes generates a cell-surface identity code in individual neurons that functions in neural circuit assembly. Here, we show that Pcdhα gene choice involves the activation of an antisense promoter located in the first exon of each Pcdhα alternate gene. Transcription of an antisense long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) from this antisense promoter extends through the sense promoter, leading to DNA demethylation of the CTCF binding sites proximal to each promoter. Demethylation-dependent CTCF binding to both promoters facilitates cohesin-mediated DNA looping with a distal enhancer (HS5-1), locking in the transcriptional state of the chosen Pcdhα gene. Uncoupling DNA demethylation from antisense transcription by Tet3 overexpression in mouse olfactory neurons promotes CTCF binding to all Pcdhα promoters, resulting in proximity-biased DNA looping of the HS5-1 enhancer. Thus, antisense transcription-mediated promoter demethylation functions as a mechanism for distance-independent enhancer/promoter DNA looping to ensure stochastic Pcdhα promoter choice.
2019-04-15 | GSE115862 | GEO
Project description:Eukaryotic genomes are pervasively transcribed by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII), and transcription of long non-coding RNAs often overlaps with coding gene promoters. This might lead to coding gene repression in a process named Transcription Interference (TI). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae), TI is mainly driven by antisense non-coding transcription and occurs through re-shaping of promoter Nucleosome-Depleted Regions (NDRs). In this study, we developed a genetic screen to identify new players involved in Antisense-Mediated Transcription Interference (AMTI). Among the candidates, we found the HIR histone chaperone complex known to be involved in de novo histone deposition. Using genome-wide approaches, we reveal that HIR-dependent histone deposition represses the promoters of SAGA-dependent genes via antisense non-coding transcription. However, while antisense transcription is enriched at promoters of SAGA-dependent genes, this feature is not sufficient to define the mode of gene regulation. We further show that the balance between HIR-dependent nucleosome incorporation and transcription factor binding at promoters directs transcription into a SAGA- or TFIID-dependent regulation. This study sheds light on a new connection between antisense non-coding transcription and the nature of coding transcription initiation.
2021-06-03 | GSE175991 | GEO
Project description:Shape of promoter antisense RNAs regulates ligand-induced transcription activation
| PRJNA578724 | ENA
Project description:Dynamic and stable enhancer-promoter contacts regulate terminal differentiation
| PRJNA330783 | ENA
Project description:In S. pombe, about 5% of genes are meiosis-specific and accumulate little or no mRNA during vegetative growth. Here we use Affymetrix tiling arrays to characterize transcripts in vegetative and meiotic cells. In vegetative cells, many meiotic genes, especially those induced in mid-meiosis, have abundant antisense transcripts. These results suggest that antisense transcription represses sense transcription of meiotic genes in vegetative cells. Although the mechanism(s) of antisense mediated transcription repression need to be further explored, our data indicates that RNAi machinery, such as Rdp1, is not required for repression. Previously, we and others used non-strand specific methods to study splicing regulation of meiotic genes and concluded that 28 mid-meiotic genes are spliced only in meiosis. We now demonstrate that the “unspliced” signal in vegetative cells comes from the antisense RNA, not from unspliced sense RNA, andwe argue against the idea that splicing regulates these mid-meiotic genes. Most of these mid-meiotic genes are induced in mid-meiosis by the forkhead transcription factor Mei4. Interestingly, deletion of a different forkhead transcription factor, Fkh2, allows low levels of sense expression of some mid-meiotic genes in vegetative cells. We propose that expression of mid-meiotic genes is kept tightly off in vegetative cells by two independent ways: antisense transcription and Fkh2 repression.
2011-11-01 | E-MEXP-3414 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Antisense transcription is common at mammalian promoters. Previous studies have largely focused on characterizing antisense transcription initiating upstream of gene transcription start sites. Here, we systematically characterize promoter-proximal antisense transcription downstream of gene transcription starts sites in human T-47D cells, investigating the genomic context of downstream antisense transcription. We find that downstream antisense transcription is widespread, with antisense transcription initiation observed within 2 kb of 28% of gene transcription start sites. Downstream antisense transcription is correlated with many regulatory features at gene promoters despite not being categorically associated with gene activation or repression. At the downstream antisense transcription start site, DNA is accessible, is enriched for protein-associated sequences motifs, and is bound by a variety of transcription factors. Downstream antisense transcription initiates between nucleosomes regularly positioned downstream of gene transcription start sites. Those nucleosomes between gene and downstream antisense transcription start sites carry histone modifications associated with active promoters, such as H3K4me3 and H3K27ac. Strikingly, this same region is bound by chromatin remodeling complexes such as HDAC and SWI/SNF. The coincidence of transcription initiation with nucleosomes displaying promoter-associated histone marks underlies an apparent connection between antisense transcription and the chromatin environment at gene promoters. The association of chromatin remodelers at sites of downstream antisense transcription initiation suggests that antisense transcription contributes to the deposition and maintenance of these chromatin features at gene promoters.
2017-02-11 | GSE74308 | GEO
Project description:Antisense-mediated repression of SAGA-dependent genes involves the HIR histone chaperone
| PRJNA734519 | ENA
Project description:Shape of promoter antisense RNAs regulates ligand-induced transcription activation [Shape-Map]
| PRJNA686387 | ENA