Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

ABSTRACT: Fungi and protist community in petroleum contaminated soil

PROVIDER: PRJNA1082403 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR28161400_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR28161400_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR28161401_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR28161401_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR28161402_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 110

Similar Datasets

Comparison of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) contaminated soils from Spain with a community-specific microarray

Project description:Comparison of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) contaminated soils from Spain with a community-specific microarray. These results are being submitted for publication and represent the first use of microarrays for analysis of soil DNA and the first community-specific microarray design. Keywords: other

2004-11-19 | GSE1985 | GEO

Project description:Bacteria community in petroleum contaminated soil

| PRJNA1082064 | ENA

soil metagenome

Project description:Microbial Community in Petroleum Contaminated Soil Metagenome

| PRJNA257330 | ENA

Comparison of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) contaminated soils from Spain with a community-specific microarray

2010-06-05 | E-GEOD-1985 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Whole transcriptome analysis of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Aca13 induced by n-hexadecane or naphthalene

Project description:Petroleum hydrocarbons are recalcitrant contaminants, which has caused most serious environmental problems. Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Aca13 was isolated from petroleum polluted soil for petroleum biodegradation. Hexadecane and naphthalene were used to incubate with Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Aca13. After incubation, the whole transcriptome was obtained from treated groups and control groups, and then used for RNA sequence and analysis. Obtained data in this project will help us understand the biodegradation mechanism of hexadecane and naphthalene, and will be helpful for the bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons.

2024-06-30 | GSE235642 | GEO

Neosartorya fischeri Comparative Transcriptome when the fungi uses a differente carbon source, petroleum asphaltenes or glucose-peptona

Project description:Neosartorya fischeri is a fungi that is able to grow in petroleum asphaltenes as sole carbon source. Here, was investigated which enzymes were up regulated

2015-04-23 | GSE68146 | GEO

soil metagenome

Project description:Petroleum-contaminated soil Metagenomic assembly

| PRJNA946365 | ENA

Petroleum-Contaminated Soil

Project description:Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Metagenomic assembly

| PRJNA722157 | ENA

Project description:Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated soil samples

| PRJNA576377 | ENA

Microarray analysis of high Arctic soil bacterial response to hydrocarbon pollution and bioremediation: genomic DNA

Project description:High Arctic soils have low nutrient availability, low moisture content and very low temperatures and, as such, they pose a particular problem in terms of hydrocarbon bioremediation. An in-depth knowledge of the microbiology involved in this process is likely to be crucial to understand and optimize the factors most influencing bioremediation. Here, we compared two distinct large-scale field bioremediation experiments, located at Alert (ex situ approach) and Eureka (in situ approach), in the Canadian high Arctic. Bacterial community structure and function were assessed using microarrays targeting the 16S rRNA genes of bacteria found in cold environments and hydrocarbon degradation genes as well as reverse-transcriptase real-time PCR targeting key functional genes. Results indicated a large difference between sampling sites in terms of both soil microbiology and decontamination rates. A rapid reorganization of the bacterial community structure and functional potential as well as rapid increases in the expression of alkane monooxygenases and polyaromatic hydrocarbon ring-hydroxylating-dioxygenases were observed one month after the bioremediation treatment commenced in the Alert soils. In contrast, no clear changes in community structure were observed in Eureka soils, while key gene expression increased after a relatively long lag period (1 year). Such discrepancies are likely caused by differences in bioremediation treatments (i.e. ex situ vs. in situ), weathering of the hydrocarbons, indigenous microbial communities, and environmental factors such as soil humidity and temperature. In addition, this study demonstrates the value of molecular tools for the monitoring of polar bacteria and their associated functions during bioremediation. 38 soil samples from two high arctic locations that were contaminated-treated, contaminated or not contaminated followed for up to 4 years

2010-05-15 | E-GEOD-17517 | biostudies-arrayexpress

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data