Project description:Affymetrix expression arrays were used to compare expression patterns upon knockdown of PARP-1, PARG, SIRT1, or macroH2A in comparison to Luciferase control.
Project description:Affymetrix expression arrays were used to compare expression patterns upon knockdown of PARP-1, PARG, SIRT1, or macroH2A in comparison to Luciferase control. Total RNA isolated from three independently generated control-matched MCF-7 knockdown cell lines targeting Luciferase (control), PARP-1, PARG, SIRT1, and macroH2A was used to probe Affymetrix Human U133A 2.0 Expression Microarrays. The raw array data was processed by Affymetrix GeneChip Operating Software (GCOS) to obtain detection calls (ABS_CALL) and signal values (VALUE_2). The signals were then normalized by scaling to a target value of 500 using GCOS. To adjust for batch effects due to day-to-day differences in RNA isolations, the empirical Bayes method was applied to the data set. After adjusting any values less than 0.01 to 0.01, the data was log2 transformed, median centered for each array, and median centered for each individual probe set (VALUE). Filters were then applied to obtain final gene lists.
Project description:SIRT1 is a nuclear NAD+-dependent protein deacetylase. Expression microarray analysis was used to study the effect of SIRT1 knockdown on gene expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Experiment Overall Design: SIRT1 stable knockdown was achieved using two retroviral shRNA constructs. An shRNA directed against Luciferase was used to generate the Luc control cells. Three independent biological replicates with matching Luc controls were analyzed using Affymetrix U133A 2.0 microarrays. Experiment Overall Design: These 6 samples were part of a 15-sample microarray analysis (GSE12971) examining expression regulation by SIRT1, PARP-1, PARG and macroH2A. All 15 samples were included for the following data normalization steps: data sets obtained using the GCOS software were grouped based on date of experiment and adjusted for batch effect using the parametric empirical Bayes method (Combat R); all values < 0.01 were adjusted to 0.01; the data were log2 transformed, median centered for each array, and median centered for each gene.
Project description:Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) are enzymes that modify target proteins in the nucleus by the addition and removal, respectively, of ADP-ribose polymers. Although a role for PARP-1 in gene regulation has been well established, the role of PARG is less clear. To investigate how PARP-1 and PARG coordinately regulate global patterns of gene expression, we used short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) to stably knockdown PARP-1 or PARG in MCF-7 cells, followed by expression microarray analyses. Experiment Overall Design: Two shRNAs targeting Luciferase (Luc, control), PARP-1, or PARG were cloned into the pSUPER.retro vector (puro or neo resistant) and sequentially introduced into parental MCF-7 cells using a standard retroviral infection technique. Luc, PARP-1, and PARG control-matched cell lines were generated three independent times. Experiment Overall Design: Total RNA was isolated from stable Luc, PARP-1, and PARG knockdown cells was analyzed for global patterns of gene expression. Briefly, 7 μg of total RNA was labeled using Affymetrix's standard one-cycle amplification and labeling protocol. The labeled cRNA was then hybridized to Affymetrix Human U133A 2.0 GeneChips, which were scanned using a GeneChip Scanner 3000. Each biological replicate (1, 2 or 3) represents a single RNA isolation from each set of cell lines. Experiment Overall Design: These 9 samples were samples were part of a 15-sample microarray analysis (GSE12971) examining expression regulation by SIRT1, PARP-1, PARG and macroH2A. All 15 samples were included for the data normalization steps. Experiment Overall Design: The raw array data was processed by Affymetrix GeneChip Operating Software (GCOS) to obtain detection calls (ABS_CALL) and signal values (VALUE_2). The signals were then normalized by scaling to a target value of 500 using GCOS. To adjust for batch effects due to day-to-day differences in RNA isolations, the empirical Bayes method was applied to the data set. After adjusting any values less than 0.01 to 0.01, the data was log2 transformed, median centered for each array, and median centered for each individual probe set (VALUE). Filters were then applied to obtain final gene lists. Experiment Overall Design: Specifically, the criteria for a gene to be considered regulated by PARP-1 or PARG was: (1) detection call flagged as present or marginal in 2 out of 3 array replicates for both control and factor knockdown cell lines and (2) significance of values between control and knockdown cell lines for any given gene had a two-tailed Studentâ??s t-test with a p-value < 0.05. To determine the genes most robustly regulated by PARP-1 or PARG, a fold change criteria was applied, namely log2 fold change > 0.5 or < -0.5 when compared to the Luc control knockdown cells.
Project description:Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) are enzymes that modify target proteins in the nucleus by the addition and removal, respectively, of ADP-ribose polymers. Although a role for PARP-1 in gene regulation has been well established, the role of PARG is less clear. To investigate how PARP-1 and PARG coordinately regulate global patterns of gene expression, we used short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) to stably knockdown PARP-1 or PARG in MCF-7 cells, followed by expression microarray analyses.
Project description:We have sequenced miRNA libraries from human embryonic, neural and foetal mesenchymal stem cells. We report that the majority of miRNA genes encode mature isomers that vary in size by one or more bases at the 3’ and/or 5’ end of the miRNA. Northern blotting for individual miRNAs showed that the proportions of isomiRs expressed by a single miRNA gene often differ between cell and tissue types. IsomiRs were readily co-immunoprecipitated with Argonaute proteins in vivo and were active in luciferase assays, indicating that they are functional. Bioinformatics analysis predicts substantial differences in targeting between miRNAs with minor 5’ differences and in support of this we report that a 5’ isomiR-9-1 gained the ability to inhibit the expression of DNMT3B and NCAM2 but lost the ability to inhibit CDH1 in vitro. This result was confirmed by the use of isomiR-specific sponges. Our analysis of the miRGator database indicates that a small percentage of human miRNA genes express isomiRs as the dominant transcript in certain cell types and analysis of miRBase shows that 5’ isomiRs have replaced canonical miRNAs many times during evolution. This strongly indicates that isomiRs are of functional importance and have contributed to the evolution of miRNA genes
Project description:SIRT1 is a nuclear NAD+-dependent protein deacetylase. Expression microarray analysis was used to study the effect of SIRT1 knockdown on gene expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells.
Project description:Kynureninase is a member of a large family of catalytically diverse but structurally homologous pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP) dependent enzymes known as the aspartate aminotransferase superfamily or alpha-family. The Homo sapiens and other eukaryotic constitutive kynureninases preferentially catalyze the hydrolytic cleavage of 3-hydroxy-l-kynurenine to produce 3-hydroxyanthranilate and l-alanine, while l-kynurenine is the substrate of many prokaryotic inducible kynureninases. The human enzyme was cloned with an N-terminal hexahistidine tag, expressed, and purified from a bacterial expression system using Ni metal ion affinity chromatography. Kinetic characterization of the recombinant enzyme reveals classic Michaelis-Menten behavior, with a Km of 28.3 +/- 1.9 microM and a specific activity of 1.75 micromol min-1 mg-1 for 3-hydroxy-dl-kynurenine. Crystals of recombinant kynureninase that diffracted to 2.0 A were obtained, and the atomic structure of the PLP-bound holoenzyme was determined by molecular replacement using the Pseudomonas fluorescens kynureninase structure (PDB entry 1qz9) as the phasing model. A structural superposition with the P. fluorescens kynureninase revealed that these two structures resemble the "open" and "closed" conformations of aspartate aminotransferase. The comparison illustrates the dynamic nature of these proteins' small domains and reveals a role for Arg-434 similar to its role in other AAT alpha-family members. Docking of 3-hydroxy-l-kynurenine into the human kynureninase active site suggests that Asn-333 and His-102 are involved in substrate binding and molecular discrimination between inducible and constitutive kynureninase substrates.