Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

ABSTRACT: Explosive contaminated soils metabarcoding

PROVIDER: PRJNA1195925 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR31649704_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR31649704_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR31649705_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR31649705_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR31649706_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 130

Similar Datasets

Comparison of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) contaminated soils from Spain with a community-specific microarray

Project description:Comparison of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) contaminated soils from Spain with a community-specific microarray. These results are being submitted for publication and represent the first use of microarrays for analysis of soil DNA and the first community-specific microarray design. Keywords: other

2004-11-19 | GSE1985 | GEO

Comparison of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) contaminated soils from Spain with a community-specific microarray

2010-06-05 | E-GEOD-1985 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Microarray analysis of high Arctic soil bacterial response to hydrocarbon pollution and bioremediation: genomic DNA

Project description:High Arctic soils have low nutrient availability, low moisture content and very low temperatures and, as such, they pose a particular problem in terms of hydrocarbon bioremediation. An in-depth knowledge of the microbiology involved in this process is likely to be crucial to understand and optimize the factors most influencing bioremediation. Here, we compared two distinct large-scale field bioremediation experiments, located at Alert (ex situ approach) and Eureka (in situ approach), in the Canadian high Arctic. Bacterial community structure and function were assessed using microarrays targeting the 16S rRNA genes of bacteria found in cold environments and hydrocarbon degradation genes as well as reverse-transcriptase real-time PCR targeting key functional genes. Results indicated a large difference between sampling sites in terms of both soil microbiology and decontamination rates. A rapid reorganization of the bacterial community structure and functional potential as well as rapid increases in the expression of alkane monooxygenases and polyaromatic hydrocarbon ring-hydroxylating-dioxygenases were observed one month after the bioremediation treatment commenced in the Alert soils. In contrast, no clear changes in community structure were observed in Eureka soils, while key gene expression increased after a relatively long lag period (1 year). Such discrepancies are likely caused by differences in bioremediation treatments (i.e. ex situ vs. in situ), weathering of the hydrocarbons, indigenous microbial communities, and environmental factors such as soil humidity and temperature. In addition, this study demonstrates the value of molecular tools for the monitoring of polar bacteria and their associated functions during bioremediation. 38 soil samples from two high arctic locations that were contaminated-treated, contaminated or not contaminated followed for up to 4 years

2010-05-15 | E-GEOD-17517 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Microarray analysis of high Arctic soil bacterial response to hydrocarbon pollution and bioremediation: 16S rRNA

2010-06-19 | E-GEOD-17532 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Project description:chnages in microbial community structure of an explosive contaminated site

| PRJNA602056 | ENA

Contaminated soils

Project description:Contaminated soils Genome sequencing

| PRJNA490097 | ENA

soil metagenome

Project description:Varennes Communities in Contaminated Soils

| PRJNA210656 | ENA

Project description:Metagenomics of arsenic-contaminated soils