Rattus norvegicus
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA120791 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:The aim of this study was to use global gene expression profiling to define intrinsic molecular differences that distinguish olfactory ensheathing cells from mucosa (OM-OECs) from olfactory ensheathing cells from olfactory bulb (OB-OECs). 10,000 OECs from olfactory mucosa (OM) or olfactory bulb (OB) were isolated from 4 rats.
2009-12-02 | GSE19250 | GEO
Project description:Olfactory ensheathing cells are one of the few central nervous system regenerative cells discovered so far. It is characterized by its lifelong nerve regeneration function, and it can also release a variety of neurotrophic factors and neural adhesion molecules. It is considered to be the glial cell with the strongest myelination ability. Olfactory ensheathing cells and Schwann cells have phenotypes in common, they can promote axon regeneration(R. Doucette, 1995). Olfactory ensheathing cells have the characteristics of Schwann cells and astrocytes, but the overall performance tends to be the former, which has two unique characteristics. First, it exists not only in the peripheral nerves (Schwann cells), but also in the central nervous system (astroglia); second, the olfactory mucosa has the ability to regenerate life-long, including human olfactory ensheathing cells(J. C. Bartolomei and C. A. Greer, 2000). Regeneration is a process in which olfactory ensheathing cells participate in efficient regulation, although the specific mechanism is not yet clear. Olfactory ensheathing cells are different from astrocytes and Schwann cells, but at the same time have the characteristics of these two cells(S. C. Barnett, 2004), like Schwann cells help axon growth, but more than Schwann cells It can make axons grow long distances, that is, it has stronger migration(A. Ramon-Cueto et al., 1998); there are also astrocytes that have a nutritional effect on the survival of neurons and the growth of axons, but olfactory ensheathing cells can also wrap neurons forms myelin sheath to support the growth of nerve processes(R. Devon and R. Doucette, 1992; J. Gu et al., 2019). There are two characteristics that make olfactory ensheathing cells the best choice for the treatment of neurological diseases(S. C. Chiu et al., 2009; J. Kim et al., 2018; M. Abdel-Rahman et al., 2018). Olfactory ensheathing cells are gradually used to treat spinal cord injuries and have shown amazing effects(J. C. Bartolomei and C. A. Greer, 2000; K. J. Liu et al., 2010; R. Yao et al., 2018). Olfactory ensheathing cells that have been used in research are usually derived from the olfactory bulb(E. H. Franssen et al., 2007), but it is easier to obtain olfactory ensheathing cells from the olfactory mucosa in clinical practice(M. Ryszard et al., 2006), so the difference between the olfactory ensheathing cells from the olfactory bulb and the olfactory mucosa There are more and more studies(B. M. U. et al., 2007), and previous studies have shown that they not only have many similar functions, but also have many differences(M. W. Richter et al., 2005; L. Wang et al., 2014; K. E. Smith et al., 2020). Because olfactory ensheathing cells derived from the olfactory bulb are not easy to obtain, olfactory ensheathing cells derived from the olfactory mucosa have become the focus of attention. Although we know that olfactory ensheathing cells from two sources have nerve repair functions, it is not clear why the two different sources of olfactory ensheathing cells have different therapeutic effects. Nicolas G. once studied that the genetic difference between the two cells and found that there are many genes related to wound repair and nerve regeneration(G. Nicolas et al., 2010). We have reason to guess that olfactory ensheathing cells from these two sources will also have a large difference in protein level. Our research group wants to use the current mature transcriptome and proteomic sequencing technologies to explore the difference between olfactory ensheathing cells from the olfactory bulb and olfactory mucosa, and explain why the two sources of olfactory ensheathing cells shows different therapeutic effects, hope to provide a new theoretical basis for future clinical treatment.
2022-02-16 | PXD024046 | Pride
Project description:Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) are neural crest-derived glia that ensheath bundles of olfactory axons from their peripheral origins in the olfactory epithelium to their central targets in the olfactory bulb. We took an unbiased laser microdissection and differential RNA-seq approach, validated by in situ hybridisation, to identify candidate molecular mechanisms underlying mouse OEC development and differences with the neural crest-derived Schwann cells developing on other peripheral nerves. We identified 25 novel markers for developing OECs in the olfactory mucosa and/or the olfactory nerve layer surrounding the olfactory bulb, of which 15 were OEC-specific, i.e., not expressed by Schwann cells. One pan-OEC-specific gene, Ptprz1, encodes a receptor-like tyrosine phosphatase that blocks oligodendrocyte differentiation. Mutant analysis suggests Ptprz1 may also act as a brake on OEC differentiation, and that its loss disrupts olfactory axon targeting. Overall, our results provide new insights into OEC development and the diversification of neural crest-derived glia.
2020-06-02 | GSE138596 | GEO
Project description:In order to improve our knowledge of olfactory ensheathing cells of the olfactory mucosa, we performed a wide microarray experiment to characterize the cell subpopulations found in primary olfactory mucosa cell cultures (CD90, P75 and TRKA cells). The consequences of the conditionning of TRKA cells by FBS deprivation and TGF-a supplementation was also studied.
2019-12-01 | GSE91017 | GEO
Project description:Nasal mucosa and olfactory bulb are separated by the cribriform plate which is perforated by olfactory nerves. We have previously demonstrated that the cribriform plate is permissive for T cells and monocytes and that viruses can enter the bulb upon intranasal injection by axonal transportation. Therefore, we hypothesized that nasal mucosa and olfactory bulb are equipped to deal with constant infectious threats. To detect genes involved in this process, we compared gene expression in nasal mucosa and bulb of mice kept under specific pathogen free (SPF) conditions to gene expression of mice kept on non-SPF conditions using RNA deep sequencing. We found massive alterations in the expression of immune-related genes of the nasal mucosa, while the bulb did not respond immunologically. The absence of induction of immune-related genes in the olfactory bulb suggests effective defence mechanisms hindering entrance of environmental pathogens beyond the outer arachnoid layer. The genes detected in this study may include candidates conferring susceptibility to meningitis.
2018-02-13 | GSE102457 | GEO
Project description:Expression data from rat spinal cord injury and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) or olfactory ensheathing cells (OEC) transplantation
| PRJNA203304 | ENA
Project description:This microarray study aimed at identifying the differences in the global gene expression growth program of adult cultured olfactory ensheathing cells (cOEC) (from the olfactory bulb) versus adult cultured Schwann cells (SC) (from the sciatic nerve) and versus adult OEC directly dissected from the olfactory nerve layer (nOEC). The aim of the comparison between cOEC and SC is to define intrinsic molecular differences that distinguish cOEC from SC (both cell types support neuronal regeneration). The aim of the comparison between cOEC and nOEC is to determine the transcriptional responses that are induced in OEC during culturing.
2010-11-02 | GSE24801 | GEO
Project description:Cell subpopulations in cultures of rat's olfactory mucosa
| PRJNA356687 | ENA
Project description:This microarray study aimed at identifying the differences in the global gene expression growth program of adult cultured olfactory ensheathing cells (cOEC) (from the olfactory bulb) versus adult cultured Schwann cells (SC) (from the sciatic nerve) and versus adult OEC directly dissected from the olfactory nerve layer (nOEC). The aim of the comparison between cOEC and SC is to define intrinsic molecular differences that distinguish cOEC from SC (both cell types support neuronal regeneration). The aim of the comparison between cOEC and nOEC is to determine the transcriptional responses that are induced in OEC during culturing. Three-condition experiment: cOEC vs. SC, cOEC vs. nOEC, SC vs. nOEC. Biological replicates: 3 cOEC-SC replicates, 3 cOEC-nOEC replicates, 3 SC-nOEC replicates. A factorial design was used consisting of direct comparisons between the three cell types (Glonek and Solomon, 2004 (PMID 14744830).
2010-11-02 | E-GEOD-24801 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:In this work, we demonstrate that neonatal mice infected with ZIKV via intracranial injection suffers from transient olfactory dysfunction when they grow up to puberty. Moreover, ZIKV exhibits broad cellular tropism and mainly targets the olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) in the olfactory mucosa (OM) of mice. To decipher the underlying mechanism of the observed olfactory dysfunction in ZIKV infected mice at the molecular level, RNA-Seq analyses of the OM and OB samples from ZIKV infected mice were performed in comparison with that from the control animals.
2022-10-03 | GSE214567 | GEO