Homo sapiens
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA121043 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of aneuploidy by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) has not delivered the expected clinical benefit. Many previous re-analysis studies of embryos deemed aneuploid by FISH on day 3 have found a high degree of chromosomal normalcy at the blastocyst stage. While most have interpreted this as âself correction,â there remains a lack of evidence for such a phenomenon. A more comprehensive technique for 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening was utilised here to re-evaluate blastocysts previously diagnosed as abnormal by FISH and investigate possible self correction mechanisms, including extrusion or duplication of aneuploid chromosomes resulting in uniparental isodisomy (UPID), and preferential segregation of aneuploidy to the trophectoderm (TE). Embryos that developed to a morphologically normal blastocyst after an aneuploidy diagnosis by cleavage stage FISH were biopsed into 4 sections, 3 TE and 1 inner cell mass (ICM), and randomised for evaluation by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening (MA-PGD). Fifty-eight percent of blastocysts were euploid for all 24 chromosomes despite an aneuploid FISH result on day 3. Only 18% were consistent with the original FISH diagnosis, while the remaining 24% identified abnormalities that were different from the original FISH diagnosis. Abnormalities did not preferentially segregate to the TE and aneuploid chromosome extrusion or duplication resulting in UPID did not occur. Cleavage stage FISH is poorly predictive of aneuploidy in an embryo that develops into a morphologically normal blastocyst. Clinicians should consider re-evaluating embryos diagnosed as aneuploid by FISH that form morphologically normal blastocysts using a validated comprehensive 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening method. Affymetrix SNP arrays were processed according to the manufacturer's directions on DNA extracted from 50 cryopreserved blastocysts that were biopsied into 3 sections of trophectoderm and 1 inner cell mass section. Affymetrix SNP array analysis was successfully completed on 145 trophectoderm samples and 47 ICM samples from embryos, 8 lymphocyte samples from cell lines and 6 mixed male and female samples.
2010-05-19 | E-GEOD-18932 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of aneuploidy by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) has not delivered the expected clinical benefit. Many previous re-analysis studies of embryos deemed aneuploid by FISH on day 3 have found a high degree of chromosomal normalcy at the blastocyst stage. While most have interpreted this as “self correction,” there remains a lack of evidence for such a phenomenon. A more comprehensive technique for 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening was utilised here to re-evaluate blastocysts previously diagnosed as abnormal by FISH and investigate possible self correction mechanisms, including extrusion or duplication of aneuploid chromosomes resulting in uniparental isodisomy (UPID), and preferential segregation of aneuploidy to the trophectoderm (TE). Embryos that developed to a morphologically normal blastocyst after an aneuploidy diagnosis by cleavage stage FISH were biopsed into 4 sections, 3 TE and 1 inner cell mass (ICM), and randomised for evaluation by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening (MA-PGD). Fifty-eight percent of blastocysts were euploid for all 24 chromosomes despite an aneuploid FISH result on day 3. Only 18% were consistent with the original FISH diagnosis, while the remaining 24% identified abnormalities that were different from the original FISH diagnosis. Abnormalities did not preferentially segregate to the TE and aneuploid chromosome extrusion or duplication resulting in UPID did not occur. Cleavage stage FISH is poorly predictive of aneuploidy in an embryo that develops into a morphologically normal blastocyst. Clinicians should consider re-evaluating embryos diagnosed as aneuploid by FISH that form morphologically normal blastocysts using a validated comprehensive 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening method.
2010-05-19 | GSE18932 | GEO
Project description:Many studies estimate that chromosomal mosaicism within the cleavage stage human embryo is high. However, comparison of two unique methods of aneuploidy screening of blastomeres within the same embryo has not been conducted and may indicate whether mosaicism is overestimated due to technical inconsistency rather than biological phenomena. The present study investigates the prevalence of chromosomal abnormality and mosaicism found with two different single cell aneuploidy screening techniques.Thirteen arrested cleavage stage embryos were studied. Each was biopsied into individual cells (n=160). The cells from each embryo were randomized into two groups. Those destined for FISH based aneuploidy screening (n=75) were fixed, 1 cell per slide. Cells for SNP microarray based aneuploidy screening (n=85) were put into individual tubes. Microarray was significantly more reliable (96%) than FISH (83%) for providing an interpretable result (P=0.004). Markedly different results were obtained when comparing microarray and FISH results from individual embryos. Mosaicism was significantly less commonly observed by microarray (4 of 13 embryos; 31%) than by FISH (13 of 13 embryos; 100%)(P=0.0005). Although FISH evaluated fewer chromosomes per cell and fewer cells per embryo, FISH still displayed significantly more unique genetic diagnoses per embryo (3.2+0.2) than microarray (1.3+0.2)(P<0.0001). This is the first prospective, randomized, blinded, and paired comparison between microarray and FISH based aneuploidy screening. Aneuploidy and mosaicism were less common with microarray. While evaluating a smaller number of chromosomes with a proportionally smaller opportunity for finding mosaicism, FISH still had a dramatically higher level of inter-cell variation in diagnosis. SNP microarray based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening provides more complete and consistent results than FISH. Affymetrix SNP arrays were processed according to the manufacturer's directions on DNA extracted from 13 arrested cleavage stage embryos and biopsied into individual blastomere cells. Individual blastomeres were randomized and blinded for SNP microarray analysis (n = 85). Afflymetrix SNP array analysis was successfully completed on 82 blastomeres.
2010-06-09 | E-GEOD-20975 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Aneuploidy has been well documented in blastocyst embryos, but prior studies have been limited in scale and/or lack mechanistic data. We previously reported preclinical validation of microarray 24-chromosome preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) in a 24-hour protocol. The method diagnoses chromosome copy number, structural chromosome aberrations, parental source of aneuploidy, and distinguishes certain meiotic from mitotic errors. In this study our objective was to examine aneuploidy in human blastocysts and determine correspondence of karyotypes between trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM). We disaggregated 51 blastocysts from seventeen couples into ICM and one or two TE fractions. The average maternal age was 31. Next, we ran 24-chromosome microarray molecular karyotyping on all of the samples, and then performed a retrospective analysis of the data. The average per-chromosome confidence was 99.95%. Approximately 80% of blastocysts were euploid. The majority of aneuploid embryos were simple aneuploid, i.e., one or two whole-chromosome imbalances. Structural chromosome aberrations, which are common in cleavage stage embryos, occurred in only three blastocysts (5.8%). All TE biopsies derived from the same embryos were concordant. Forty-nine of fifty-one (96.1%) inner cell mass (ICM) samples were concordant with TE biopsies derived from the same embryos. Discordance between TE and ICM occurred only in the two embryos with structural chromosome aberration. We conclude that trophectoderm karyotype is an excellent predictor of inner cell mass karyotype. Discordance between TE and ICM occurred only in embryos with structural chromosome aberrations.
2010-09-28 | GSE22864 | GEO
Project description:Many studies estimate that chromosomal mosaicism within the cleavage stage human embryo is high. However, comparison of two unique methods of aneuploidy screening of blastomeres within the same embryo has not been conducted and may indicate whether mosaicism is overestimated due to technical inconsistency rather than biological phenomena. The present study investigates the prevalence of chromosomal abnormality and mosaicism found with two different single cell aneuploidy screening techniques.Thirteen arrested cleavage stage embryos were studied. Each was biopsied into individual cells (n=160). The cells from each embryo were randomized into two groups. Those destined for FISH based aneuploidy screening (n=75) were fixed, 1 cell per slide. Cells for SNP microarray based aneuploidy screening (n=85) were put into individual tubes. Microarray was significantly more reliable (96%) than FISH (83%) for providing an interpretable result (P=0.004). Markedly different results were obtained when comparing microarray and FISH results from individual embryos. Mosaicism was significantly less commonly observed by microarray (4 of 13 embryos; 31%) than by FISH (13 of 13 embryos; 100%)(P=0.0005). Although FISH evaluated fewer chromosomes per cell and fewer cells per embryo, FISH still displayed significantly more unique genetic diagnoses per embryo (3.2+0.2) than microarray (1.3+0.2)(P<0.0001). This is the first prospective, randomized, blinded, and paired comparison between microarray and FISH based aneuploidy screening. Aneuploidy and mosaicism were less common with microarray. While evaluating a smaller number of chromosomes with a proportionally smaller opportunity for finding mosaicism, FISH still had a dramatically higher level of inter-cell variation in diagnosis. SNP microarray based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening provides more complete and consistent results than FISH.
2010-05-19 | GSE20975 | GEO
Project description:Aneuploidy has been well documented in blastocyst embryos, but prior studies have been limited in scale and/or lack mechanistic data. We previously reported preclinical validation of microarray 24-chromosome preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) in a 24-hour protocol. The method diagnoses chromosome copy number, structural chromosome aberrations, parental source of aneuploidy, and distinguishes certain meiotic from mitotic errors. In this study our objective was to examine aneuploidy in human blastocysts and determine correspondence of karyotypes between trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM). We disaggregated 51 blastocysts from seventeen couples into ICM and one or two TE fractions. The average maternal age was 31. Next, we ran 24-chromosome microarray molecular karyotyping on all of the samples, and then performed a retrospective analysis of the data. The average per-chromosome confidence was 99.95%. Approximately 80% of blastocysts were euploid. The majority of aneuploid embryos were simple aneuploid, i.e., one or two whole-chromosome imbalances. Structural chromosome aberrations, which are common in cleavage stage embryos, occurred in only three blastocysts (5.8%). All TE biopsies derived from the same embryos were concordant. Forty-nine of fifty-one (96.1%) inner cell mass (ICM) samples were concordant with TE biopsies derived from the same embryos. Discordance between TE and ICM occurred only in the two embryos with structural chromosome aberration. We conclude that trophectoderm karyotype is an excellent predictor of inner cell mass karyotype. Discordance between TE and ICM occurred only in embryos with structural chromosome aberrations. We thawed all fractions at 22°C, and then added Arcturus PicoPure Lysis Buffer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) to each of the biopsies. The tubes were incubated at 56°C for one hour, and then heat inactivated at 95°C for 10 minutes. DNA from the lysed biospsies was amplified using a commercial kit (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) for multiple displacement amplification (MDA). MDA reactions were incubated at 30°C for 2.5 hours and then heat-inactivated at 65°C for five minutes. The amplified samples were genotyped using Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA) Infinium II genotyping microarrays (CytoSNP-12 chips) using a modified 24-hour protocol, as described previously*. Previously, we developed a genotyping microarray molecular karyotyping technology that uses parental genetic data to increase accuracy and determine mechanism and source of aneuploidy*. The algorithm uses parental genotypes and the observed distribution of unprocessed single cell microarray channel intensities to diagnose whole-chromosome imbalances and structural chromosome aberrations*. Because parental genotypes are available, the algorithm readily identifies parental source of whole-chromosome imbalances and structural chromosome aberrations. Additionally, the algorithm uses parental information, high confidence disomic single cell measurements on children, and recombination probabilities (genome.ucsc.edu) to determine the phase of the parental chromosomes. The phased data is then used to determine whether certain trisomies and uniparental disomies were mitotic or meiotic in origin*. *Johnson DS, Gemelos G, Baner J, Ryan A, Cinnioglu C, Banjevic M, Ross R, Alper M, Barrett B, Frederick J, Potter D, Behr B, Rabinowitz M. (2010). Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-hour protocol. Human Reproduction January 24 [Epub ahead of print].
2010-09-28 | E-GEOD-22864 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The exchange of the oocyte’s genome with the genome of a somatic cell, followed by the derivation of pluripotent stem cells, could enable the generation of specific cell types affected in degenerative human diseases. Such cells, carrying the patient’s genome, might be useful for cell replacement. Here we report that the development of human oocytes activated after genome exchange invariably arrests at the late cleavage stages in association with transcriptional abnormalities. In contrast, if the oocyte genome is not removed and the somatic cell genome is merely added, they efficiently develop to the blastocyst stage. Human stem cell lines derived from these blastocysts differentiate into cell types of all three germ layers, and a pluripotent gene expression program is established on the genome derived from the somatic cell. This result demonstrates the feasibility of reprogramming human cells using oocytes and identifies the removal of the oocyte genome as the primary cause of developmental failure after genome exchange. Future work should focus on the critical elements that are associated with the human oocyte genome. Stem cells were derived by reprogramming of skin cells using oocytes ('nuclear transfer') or defined factors (iPS cells), or from IVF blastocysts
2011-10-05 | E-GEOD-27507 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:SNP microarray based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening is significantly more consistent than FISH
| PRJNA124475 | ENA
Project description:Aneuploidy represents the most prevalent form of genetic instability found in human embryos and is the leading genetic cause of miscarriage and developmental delay in newborns. Telomere DNA deficiency is associated with genomic instability in somatic cells and may play a role in development of aneuploidy commonly found in female germ cells and human embryos. To test this hypothesis, we developed a method capable of quantifying telomere DNA in parallel with 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening from the same oocyte or embryo biopsy. Aneuploid human polar bodies possessed significantly less telomere DNA than euploid polar bodies from sibling oocytes (-3.07 fold, P=0.016). This indicates that oocytes with telomere DNA deficiency are prone to aneuploidy development during meiosis. Aneuploid embryonic cells also possessed significantly less telomere DNA than euploid embryonic cells at the cleavage stage (-2.60 fold, P=0.002) but not at the blastocyst stage (-1.18 fold, P=0.340). The lack of a significant difference at the blastocyst stage was found to be due to telomere DNA normalization between the cleavage and blastocyst stage of embryogenesis and not due to developmental arrest of embryos with short telomeres. Heterogeneity in telomere length within oocytes may provide an opportunity to improve the treatment of infertility through telomere based selection of oocytes and embryos with reproductive competence.
2011-07-04 | GSE25864 | GEO
Project description:The exchange of the oocyte's genome with the genome of a somatic cell, followed by the derivation of pluripotent stem cells, could enable the generation of specific cell types affected in degenerative human diseases. Such cells, carrying the patient's genome, might be useful for cell replacement. Here we report that the development of human oocytes activated after genome exchange invariably arrests at the late cleavage stages in association with transcriptional abnormalities. In contrast, if the oocyte genome is not removed and the somatic cell genome is merely added, they efficiently develop to the blastocyst stage. Human stem cell lines derived from these blastocysts differentiate into cell types of all three germ layers, and a pluripotent gene expression program is established on the genome derived from the somatic cell. This result demonstrates the feasibility of reprogramming human cells using oocytes and identifies the removal of the oocyte genome as the primary cause of developmental failure after genome exchange. Future work should focus on the critical elements that are associated with the human oocyte genome. Somatic cells were transferred into human unfertilized oocytes to determine if human oocytes can reprogram a somatic cell.
2011-10-05 | E-GEOD-28022 | biostudies-arrayexpress