Sus scrofa
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA135731 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:Adipose-derived and bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells were collected from 3 pigs and cultivated in vitro up to 3 passages. At passage 3 cells were cultured to 80% confluence and induced to differentiate in adipose and bone. Cell were harvested at 0 day of differentiation (dd) or pre-differentiation, at 2, 7, and 21dd for RNA extraction. The RNA was used for a large microarray analysis using a specific pig oligo-array with >10,000 annotated genes. The main aim of the microarray analysis was to directly compare the two transcriptomics adaptation of the two mesenchymal stem cells during osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation The mesenchymal stem cells were harvested at 0, 2, 7, and 21 day of differentiation (dd). A dye-swap reference design (reference = mixture of RNA from several porcine tissues) was used.
2012-03-01 | E-GEOD-25854 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Adipose-derived and bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells were collected from 3 pigs and cultivated in vitro up to 3 passages. At passage 3 cells were cultured to 80% confluence and induced to differentiate in adipose and bone. Cell were harvested at 0 day of differentiation (dd) or pre-differentiation, at 2, 7, and 21dd for RNA extraction. The RNA was used for a large microarray analysis using a specific pig oligo-array with >10,000 annotated genes. The main aim of the microarray analysis was to directly compare the two transcriptomics adaptation of the two mesenchymal stem cells during osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation
2012-03-01 | GSE25854 | GEO
Project description:Pathological processes like osteoporosis or steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the hip are accompanied by increased bone marrow adipogenesis. Such disorder of adipogenic/osteogenic differentiation, which affects also bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) contributes to bone loss during aging. Therefore, we investigated the effects of extracellular vesicles (EVs) isolated from human (h)BMSCs during different stages of osteogenic differentiation on osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation capacity of naïve hBMSCs.
2022-10-14 | PXD035845 | Pride
Project description:Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) were isolated from the femora and tibiae of irtTA-GBD*-TAg transgenic mice. Using cellular cloning we established skeletal progenitors with unipotent osteogenic and adipogenic properties. Previous RNA-seq analysis of more progenitor types revealed differential expression in members of the Interferon-gamma (IFNγ) signaling pathway. Treatment of adipogenic progenitors with IFNγ inhibited adipogenesis and promoted osteogenesis. RNA-seq analysis of osteogenic, adipogenic and IFNγ treated adipogenic clones revealed factors controlling the osteogenic versus adipogenic commitment of bone marrow skeletal progenitors.
2018-07-02 | GSE114475 | GEO
Project description:Expression data from porcine mandibular- and tibial-derived bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.
| PRJNA321523 | ENA
Project description:While the accumulation of bone marrow adipose tissue has been positively associated with aging and high fat diet, the physiological consequences are mostly unknown. It is well established that osteogenic and adipogenic progenitors share a common developmental origin.Unfavorable microenvironmental changes may bias these cell populations towards an adipogenic fate, which in turn could negatively influence bone homeostasis. Our previously collected data from mice reveal a high plasticity of the mesenchymal osteo-adipogenic stem cell population. Therefore, we now wish to perform by RNA-seq in defined cell population with varying adipogenic commitment within this heterogeneous stem cell pool.This data is part of a pre-publication release. For information on the proper use of pre-publication data shared by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (including details of any publication moratoria), please see http://www.sanger.ac.uk/datasharing/
2016-04-11 | E-ERAD-460 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The treatment of bone defects caused by infection, trauma or neoplasms remains a clinical challenge. Autologous bone transplantation is limited by availability, donor site morbidity and surgical risk factors. This has given rise to stromal/stem-cell based therapy. Bone marrow derived stromal cells (BMSCs) have been studied to a large extent and show high regenerative potential but their use is limited by availability, donor site morbidity and the relatively low cell yield as they represent only <0.1% of cell harvested from bone marrow aspirate. At the same time, they are the closest mesenchymal stromal cells for bone tissue engineering given their tissue origin and, unlike other mesenchymal stromal cells, can support the formation of hematopoietic marrow. Adipose tissue derived stromal cells (ASCs) as part of the stromal vascular fraction of adipose tissue can as well undergo osteogenic differentiation but can be additionally isolated in a sufficient quantity from lipoaspirate after liposuction of abundant subcutaneous fat tissue. Here, it has been shown that there are no major differences in regard to proliferation or differentiation capacity of ASCs derived from subcutaneous fat of different anatomical regions. It has been shown that BMSCs are more prone to senescence during expansion and passage than ASCs and that ageing impacts proliferative capabilities of BMSCs more than that of ASCs while it has also been reported that osteogenic differentiation capacity is least impacted by age. Multiple studies have compared the characteristics of these two mesenchymal stromal cells in regard to bone tissue engineering in vitro. Most studies point to inferior extracellular matrix mineralization and lower expression of key osteogenic transcription markers like Runx2 in osteogenic differentiated ASCs compared to BMSCs. On the other hand, a study by Rath et al. found contrary results using particular culturing conditions like 3D bioglass scaffolds. An intraindividual comparison of human MSCs of three donors cultured on decellularized porcine bone confirmed superior osteogenic capacity of BMSCs compared to ASCs. In contrast to BMSCs, ASCs were not able to induce heterogenic ossification in a mouse model. In a sheep tibia defect model application of BMSCs resulted in a significantly higher amount of newly formed bone tissue. Importantly, Osteogenic differentiated ASCs do not support the formation of a hematopoietic marrow. Proteomics enables large-scale analysis of proteins present in a cell type and can be used to identify differentially regulated key proteins in a comparative approach. A comparative proteomic analysis of BMSCs and ASCs by Roche et al. in 2009 identified 556 proteins with 78% of these not being differentially regulated between these two cell populations, regarded as high similarity. Another comparative proteomic study of 2016 by Jeon et al. found 90 differentially regulated proteins out of 3000 total identified proteins. Both studies do not specify a number of different tissue donors and in part using cell lines. Looking for differences upon osteogenic differentiation, transcriptomic comparison of osteogenic differentiated porcine ASCs and BMSCs has been performed, resulting in 21 differentially expressed genes after 21 days of osteogenic culture conditions. Still, it remains unanswered, which are the key distinctive features of osteogenic differentiated ASCs and BMSCs at protein level that might help address the abovementioned weaknesses of ASCs in bone tissue engineering/regeneration for translational research. To overcome this need, an intraindividual comparative DIA based proteomic analysis of osteogenic differentiated human BMSC and ASCs was performed in this study.
2021-06-09 | PXD015223 | Pride
Project description:Ganglioside profiling (LC-MSn) of MSCs and differentiated adipogenic (fat), chondrogenic (cartilage), and osteogenic (bone) lineage; LCMS data to publication:
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.2c00230
2022-03-15 | MSV000089064 | MassIVE
Project description:To identify the molecular mechanism determining the lineage commitment of bone-marrow progenitors, we compared basal gene expression profiles of progenitors committed to adipogenic or osteogenic lineages. We characterize several differentially expressed metabolic and signalling pathways.
2019-02-28 | GSE124905 | GEO
Project description:Ganglioside profiling (LC-MSn) of MSCs and differentiated adipogenic (fat), chondrogenic (cartilage), and osteogenic (bone) lineage; LCMS data to publication:
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.2c00230
2022-03-15 | MSV000089064 | GNPS