A dual cis-regulatory code links IRF8 to constitutive and inducible gene expression in macrophages.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA242506 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR1202040.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR1202050.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR1202060.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR1202070_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR1202070_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 77 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:The transcription factor (TF) interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) controls both developmental and inflammatory stimulus-inducible genes in macrophages, but the mechanisms underlying these two different functions are largely unknown. One possibility is that these different roles are linked to the ability of IRF8 to bind alternative DNA sequences. We found that IRF8 is recruited to distinct sets of DNA consensus sequences before and after lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. In resting cells, IRF8 was mainly bound to composite sites together with the master regulator of myeloid development PU.1. Basal IRF8M-bM-^@M-^SPU.1 binding maintained the expression of a broad panel of genes essential for macrophage functions (such as microbial recognition and response to purines) and contributed to basal expression of many LPS-inducible genes. After LPS stimulation, increased expression of IRF8, other IRFs, and AP-1 family TFs enabled IRF8 binding to thousands of additional regions containing low-affinity multimerized IRF sites and composite IRFM-bM-^@M-^SAP-1 sites, which were not premarked by PU.1 and did not contribute to the basal IRF8 cistrome. While constitutively expressed IRF8-dependent genes contained only sites mediating basal IRF8/PU.1 recruitment, inducible IRF8-dependent genes contained variable combinations of constitutive and inducible sites. Overall, these data show at the genome scale how the same TF can be linked to constitutive and inducible gene regulation via distinct combinations of alternative DNA-binding sites. Chromatin immuno-precipitations of transcription factors IRF8, IRF1, PU.1, STAT1, STAT2 and of H3 lysine 27 acetylated followed by multiparallel sequencing, performed in bone marrow-derived macrophages from wild type (WT) and BXH2/TyJ mice. Cells were treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for 2 or 4 hours, or interferon b (IFNb) for 30 or 60 minutes, 2 or 4 hours, or left unstimulated.
2015-01-30 | E-GEOD-56121 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:IThe transcription factor (TF) interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) controls both developmental and inflammatory stimulus-inducible genes in macrophages, but the mechanisms underlying these two different functions are largely unknown. One possibility is that these different roles are linked to the ability of IRF8 to bind alternative DNA sequences. We found that IRF8 is recruited to distinct sets of DNA consensus sequences before and after lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. In resting cells, IRF8 was mainly bound to composite sites together with the master regulator of myeloid development PU.1. Basal IRF8M-bM-^@M-^SPU.1 binding maintained the expression of a broad panel of genes essential for macrophage functions (such as microbial recognition and response to purines) and contributed to basal expression of many LPS-inducible genes. After LPS stimulation, increased expression of IRF8, other IRFs, and AP-1 family TFs enabled IRF8 binding to thousands of additional regions containing low-affinity multimerized IRF sites and composite IRFM-bM-^@M-^SAP-1 sites, which were not premarked by PU.1 and did not contribute to the basal IRF8 cistrome. While constitutively expressed IRF8-dependent genes contained only sites mediating basal IRF8/PU.1 recruitment, inducible IRF8-dependent genes contained variable combinations of constitutive and inducible sites. Overall, these data show at the genome scale how the same TF can be linked to constitutive and inducible gene regulation via distinct combinations of alternative DNA-binding sites. Bone marrow cells isolated from C57BL/6 or BXH2/TyJ mice were plated in 10 cm plates in 5ml of BM-medium (high glucose DMEM supplemented with 20% low endotoxin fetal bovine serum, 30% L929-conditioned medium, 1% glutamine, 1%, Pen/Strep, 0.5% Sodium Pyruvate, 0.1% M-NM-2-mercaptoethanol). Cultures were fed with 2.5 ml of fresh medium every two days. Macrophages were subjected to different treatment (see individual samples for details). Total RNA was extracted from 5x106 cells using RNAeasy kit (Qiagen). Libraries were prepared from 1-2 M-BM-5g of RNA, after oligo-dT selection, using the TruSeq RNA sample preparation kit (Illumina).
2015-01-30 | E-GEOD-56122 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The transcription factor (TF) interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) controls both developmental and inflammatory stimulus-inducible genes in macrophages, but the mechanisms underlying these two different functions are largely unknown. One possibility is that these different roles are linked to the ability of IRF8 to bind alternative DNA sequences. We found that IRF8 is recruited to distinct sets of DNA consensus sequences before and after lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. In resting cells, IRF8 was mainly bound to composite sites together with the master regulator of myeloid development PU.1. Basal IRF8–PU.1 binding maintained the expression of a broad panel of genes essential for macrophage functions (such as microbial recognition and response to purines) and contributed to basal expression of many LPS-inducible genes. After LPS stimulation, increased expression of IRF8, other IRFs, and AP-1 family TFs enabled IRF8 binding to thousands of additional regions containing low-affinity multimerized IRF sites and composite IRF–AP-1 sites, which were not premarked by PU.1 and did not contribute to the basal IRF8 cistrome. While constitutively expressed IRF8-dependent genes contained only sites mediating basal IRF8/PU.1 recruitment, inducible IRF8-dependent genes contained variable combinations of constitutive and inducible sites. Overall, these data show at the genome scale how the same TF can be linked to constitutive and inducible gene regulation via distinct combinations of alternative DNA-binding sites.
2015-01-30 | GSE56121 | GEO
Project description:IThe transcription factor (TF) interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) controls both developmental and inflammatory stimulus-inducible genes in macrophages, but the mechanisms underlying these two different functions are largely unknown. One possibility is that these different roles are linked to the ability of IRF8 to bind alternative DNA sequences. We found that IRF8 is recruited to distinct sets of DNA consensus sequences before and after lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. In resting cells, IRF8 was mainly bound to composite sites together with the master regulator of myeloid development PU.1. Basal IRF8–PU.1 binding maintained the expression of a broad panel of genes essential for macrophage functions (such as microbial recognition and response to purines) and contributed to basal expression of many LPS-inducible genes. After LPS stimulation, increased expression of IRF8, other IRFs, and AP-1 family TFs enabled IRF8 binding to thousands of additional regions containing low-affinity multimerized IRF sites and composite IRF–AP-1 sites, which were not premarked by PU.1 and did not contribute to the basal IRF8 cistrome. While constitutively expressed IRF8-dependent genes contained only sites mediating basal IRF8/PU.1 recruitment, inducible IRF8-dependent genes contained variable combinations of constitutive and inducible sites. Overall, these data show at the genome scale how the same TF can be linked to constitutive and inducible gene regulation via distinct combinations of alternative DNA-binding sites.
2015-01-30 | GSE56122 | GEO
Project description:The transcription factor (TF) interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) controls both developmental and inflammatory stimulus-inducible genes in macrophages, but the mechanisms underlying these two different functions are largely unknown. One possibility is that these different roles are linked to the ability of IRF8 to bind alternative DNA sequences. We found that IRF8 is recruited to distinct sets of DNA consensus sequences before and after lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. In resting cells, IRF8 was mainly bound to composite sites together with the master regulator of myeloid development PU.1. Basal IRF8-PU.1 binding maintained the expression of a broad panel of genes essential for macrophage functions (such as microbial recognition and response to purines) and contributed to basal expression of many LPS-inducible genes. After LPS stimulation, increased expression of IRF8, other IRFs, and AP-1 family TFs enabled IRF8 binding to thousands of additional regions containing low-affinity multimerized IRF sites and composite IRF-AP-1 sites, which were not premarked by PU.1 and did not contribute to the basal IRF8 cistrome. While constitutively expressed IRF8-dependent genes contained only sites mediating basal IRF8/PU.1 recruitment, inducible IRF8-dependent genes contained variable combinations of constitutive and inducible sites. Overall, these data show at the genome scale how the same TF can be linked to constitutive and inducible gene regulation via distinct combinations of alternative DNA-binding sites.
| S-EPMC4335295 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below. Refer to individual Series
2015-01-30 | E-GEOD-56123 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.
2015-01-30 | GSE56123 | GEO
Project description:Type 1 classical dendritic cells (cDC1s) development requires the transcription factor IRF8, and IRF8 mutations cause severe combined immunodeficiency, including disseminated bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) disease. IRF8 regulated enhancers are required for Irf8 expression in early DC progenitors and mature cDC1s. The E-protein-dependent +41 kb enhancer gains accessibility and activates transcription in common DC progenitors (CDPs), and its depletion abrogated pre-cDC1s specification. The Batf3-dependent +32 kb enhancer gains accessibility and activates transcription in pre-cDC1 progenitors, and its depletion impaired cDC1 maturation. The +32 kb Irf8 enhancer locus bears an enhancer transcript, and the production of enhancer RNA (eRNA) Gm39266 is dependent on +41 kb Irf8 enhancer. It was unclear whether the +32 kb and +41 kb enhancers act independently or cooperate to regulate Irf8 expression. We dissected the mechanisms using +32/+41 compound heterozygous mice, and found that while the +41 kb enhancer suffices for pre-cDC1 progenitor specification, the +32 kb and +41 kb enhancers must reside on one allele to support cDC1 maturation. The +41 kb enhancer cis-regulates chromatin accessibility and BATF3 binding at +32 kb enhancer, independent of eRNA Gm39266 transcripts or transcription across +32 kb Irf8 enhancer.
2023-03-15 | GSE218991 | GEO
Project description:Type 1 classical dendritic cells (cDC1s) development requires the transcription factor IRF8, and IRF8 mutations cause severe combined immunodeficiency, including disseminated bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) disease. IRF8 regulated enhancers are required for Irf8 expression in early DC progenitors and mature cDC1s. The E-protein-dependent +41 kb enhancer gains accessibility and activates transcription in common DC progenitors (CDPs), and its depletion abrogated pre-cDC1s specification. The Batf3-dependent +32 kb enhancer gains accessibility and activates transcription in pre-cDC1 progenitors, and its depletion impaired cDC1 maturation. The +32 kb Irf8 enhancer locus bears an enhancer transcript, and the production of enhancer RNA (eRNA) Gm39266 is dependent on +41 kb Irf8 enhancer. It was unclear whether the +32 kb and +41 kb enhancers act independently or cooperate to regulate Irf8 expression. We dissected the mechanisms using +32/+41 compound heterozygous mice, and found that while the +41 kb enhancer suffices for pre-cDC1 progenitor specification, the +32 kb and +41 kb enhancers must reside on one allele to support cDC1 maturation. The +41 kb enhancer cis-regulates chromatin accessibility and BATF3 binding at +32 kb enhancer, independent of eRNA Gm39266 transcripts or transcription across +32 kb Irf8 enhancer.
2023-03-15 | GSE218990 | GEO
Project description:A dual cis-regulatory code links IRF8 to constitutive and inducible gene expression in macrophages.
| PRJNA242508 | ENA