Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Homo sapiens

ABSTRACT: Evaluation of RNA amplification and RNA-Seq library preparation protocols for spermatozoa RNA profiling

PROVIDER: PRJNA246558 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR1282310_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR1282310_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR1282320_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR1282320_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR1282311_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 32

Similar Datasets

Systematic assessment of next-generation sequencing for quantitative small RNA profiling: synthetic equimolar pool

Project description:Small RNA-seq is increasingly being used for profiling of small RNAs. Quantitative characteristics of long RNA-seq have been extensively described, but small RNA-seq involves fundamentally different methods for library preparation, with distinct protocols and technical variations that have not been fully and systematically studied. Using common sets of reference samples, we evaluated the accuracy, reproducibility and bias of small RNA-seq library preparation for five distinct protocols and across nine different laboratories. As part of this larger study, we assessed sequencing bias and reproducibility using an equimolar pool of 1,152 small RNA sequences ranging from 15-90 nt, and primarily comprised of annotated human microRNAs. We observed extensive protocol-specific and sequence-specific bias that was largely mitigated in protocols employing sequencing adapters with randomized end-nucleotides. We find that sequencing bias is highly reproducible across labs using the same library preparation technologies, and use the data to calculate inter-protocol bias correction factors. These results provide strong evidence for the feasibility of reproducible cross-laboratory small RNA-seq studies, even those involving analysis of data generated using different protocols.

2018-07-09 | GSE94584 | GEO

Comparison of whole-genome bisulfite sequencing library preparation strategies identifies sources of biases affecting DNA methylation data

Project description:We performed a parallel analysis of commonly used pre- and post-bisulfite WGBS library preparation protocols for their performance and quality of sequencing outputs. Our results show that bisulfite conversion per se generates pronounced sequencing biases, and subsequent fragmentation and amplification steps lead to several-fold overrepresentation of these artefacts. Standard pre-bisulfite library preparation methods lead to a significantly biased genomic sequence representation and a marked overestimation of methylation levels. We have integrated a bias diagnostic tool in the Bismark package and propose that amplification-free and post-bisulfite procedures should become the gold standard for WGBS library preparation.

2017-02-16 | GSE77961 | GEO

Evaluation of RNA amplification and RNA-Seq library preparation protocols for spermatozoa RNA profiling

Project description:RNA-Seq technique was applied to investigate the effects of four cDNA amplification kits and two RNA-Seq library preparation kits to the deep sequencing results at different perspectives. The same set of semen samples were applied to investigate the qualitative and quantitative effect of four cDNA amplification methods and two RNA-Seq library preparation methods on sperm transcript profiling.

2015-05-09 | E-GEOD-57503 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Evaluating bias-reducing protocols for RNA sequencing library preparation

Project description:Evaluating bias-reducing protocols for RNA sequencing library preparation

| PRJEB6271 | ENA

Systematic assessment of next-generation sequencing for quantitative small RNA profiling: synthetic ratiometric pools

Project description:Small RNA-seq is increasingly being used for profiling of small RNAs. Quantitative characteristics of long RNA-seq have been extensively described, but small RNA-seq involves fundamentally different methods for library preparation, with distinct protocols and technical variations that have not been fully and systematically studied. Using common sets of reference samples, we evaluated the accuracy, reproducibility and bias of small RNA-seq library preparation for five distinct protocols and across nine different laboratories. As part of this larger study, we assessed reproducibility and accuracy of relative expression measurements using two pools of synthetic small RNA sequences, where subsets of the sRNAs vary in relative amount between pools A and B. The pools each contain 334 small RNAs, varying by 15 different ratios between pools A and B (10:1, 8:1, 5:1, 4:1, 3:1, 2:1, 1.5:1, 1:1, 1:1.5, 1:2, 1:3, 1:4 1:5, 1:8, 1:10). We find that although the sequencing bias varies extensively between protocols, the relative abundance measured between samples A and B is largely reproducible and accurate across labs and protocols. These results suggest that measurements of differential expression should be comparable across institutions and library preparation technologies.

2018-07-09 | GSE94585 | GEO

Systematic assessment of next-generation sequencing for quantitative small RNA profiling: A-to-I editing pools

Project description:Small RNA-seq is increasingly being used for profiling of small RNAs. Quantitative characteristics of long RNA-seq have been extensively described, but small RNA-seq involves fundamentally different methods for library preparation, with distinct protocols and technical variations that have not been fully and systematically studied. Using common sets of reference samples, we evaluated the accuracy, reproducibility and bias of small RNA-seq library preparation for five distinct protocols and across nine different laboratories. As part of this larger study, we assessed reproducibility and accuracy of relative expression measurements using two pools of synthetic small RNA sequences, where subsets of the sRNAs vary in relative amount between pools A and B. The pools each contain 334 small RNAs, varying by 15 different ratios between pools A and B (10:1, 8:1, 5:1, 4:1, 3:1, 2:1, 1.5:1, 1:1, 1:1.5, 1:2, 1:3, 1:4 1:5, 1:8, 1:10). We find that although the sequencing bias varies extensively between protocols, the relative abundance measured between samples A and B is largely reproducible and accurate across labs and protocols. These results suggest that measurements of differential expression should be comparable across institutions and library preparation technologies.

2018-07-09 | GSE108138 | GEO

Project description:Comparison of RO-seq Isolation Protocols and Library Preparation Methods

| PRJNA722106 | ENA

Systematic assessment of next-generation sequencing for quantitative small RNA profiling: a multiple protocol study across multiple laboratories

Project description:Small RNA-seq is increasingly being used for profiling of small RNAs. Quantitative characteristics of long RNA-seq have been extensively described, but small RNA-seq involves fundamentally different methods for library preparation, with distinct protocols and technical variations that have not been fully and systematically studied. We report here the results of a study using common references (synthetic RNA pools of defined composition, as well as plasma-derived RNA) to evaluate the accuracy, reproducibility and bias of small RNA-seq library preparation for five distinct protocols and across nine different laboratories. We observed protocol-specific and sequence-specific bias, which was ameliorated using adapters for ligation with randomized end-nucleotides, and computational correction factors. Despite this technical bias, relative quantification using small RNA-seq was remarkably accurate and reproducible, even across multiple laboratories using different methods. These results provide strong evidence for the feasibility of reproducible cross-laboratory small RNA-seq studies, even those involving analysis of data generated using different protocols. This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.

2018-07-09 | GSE94586 | GEO

Evaluation of RNA amplification and RNA-Seq library preparation protocols for spermatozoa RNA profiling

2015-05-09 | GSE57503 | GEO

Systematic assessment of next-generation sequencing for quantitative small RNA profiling: human plasma pool

Project description:Small RNA-seq is increasingly being used for profiling of small RNAs. Quantitative characteristics of long RNA-seq have been extensively described, but small RNA-seq involves fundamentally different methods for library preparation, with distinct protocols and technical variations that have not been fully and systematically studied. Using common sets of reference samples, we evaluated the accuracy, reproducibility and bias of small RNA-seq library preparation for five distinct protocols and across nine different laboratories. As part of this larger study, we assessed reproducibility and diversity of sequencing of mature miRNAs, generating libraries from RNA extracted from human plasma that was pooled from 11 healthy individuals. We find that protocol-specific biases are largely recapitulated in the biological samples, and that inter-protocol bias correction factors estimated from the more comprehensive equimolar synthetic pools can be applied to the biological samples to get more comparable, and in some cases, more accurate estimates of miRNA abundance.

2018-07-09 | GSE94582 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data