Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA256471 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR1802410.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR1802412.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR1802383.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR1802385.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR1802416.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 8 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Illumina 1M Omni Quad arrays were used to test mutation calling accuracy of qSNP tool (a mutation caller) Ilumina array genotypes with GenCal (GC score)>0.70 were used in the comparison of genotype calls using next generation sequencing data and qSNP (mutation caller)
2014-06-13 | GSE47904 | GEO
Project description:Low-pass sequencing (sequencing a genome to an average depth less than 1× coverage) combined with genotype imputation has been proposed as an alternative to genotyping arrays for trait mapping and calculation of polygenic scores. To empirically assess the relative performance of these technologies for different applications, we performed low-pass sequencing (targeting coverage levels of 0.5× and 1×) and array genotyping (using the Illumina Global Screening Array (GSA)) on 120 DNA samples derived from African and European-ancestry individuals that are part of the 1000 Genomes Project. We then imputed both the sequencing data and the genotyping array data to the 1000 Genomes Phase 3 haplotype reference panel using a leave- one-out design. We evaluated overall imputation accuracy from these different assays as well as overall power for GWAS from imputed data, and computed polygenic risk scores for coronary artery disease and breast cancer using previously derived weights. We conclude that low-pass sequencing plus imputation, in addition to providing a substantial increase in statistical power for genome wide association studies, provides increased accuracy for polygenic risk prediction at effective coverages of ∼ 0.5× and higher compared to the Illumina GSA.
2021-01-31 | GSE165845 | GEO
Project description:Crossbreeding has been an effective method to improve crossbred performance in pig industry. To have a global view of a classic three-way crossbreeding system of Duroc x (Landrace x Yorkshire) (DLY), we identified SNPs for each pig breed and crossbred individual originated from a DLY pig family to estimate the influence of purebreds on crossbred offspring using whole-genome sequencing. To confirm the accuracy of the SNPs identified by whole-genome sequencing, therefore, we performed the porcine 60K BeadChip genotyping array (Illumina) for each sequenced pig individual.
2018-12-05 | GSE123327 | GEO
Project description:A new haloalkaliphilic species of Wenzhouxiangella, strain AB-CW3 was isolated from a system of alkaline soda lakes in the Kulunda Steppe. Its complete, circular genome was assembled from combined nanopore and illumina sequencing and its proteome was determined for three different experimental conditions: growth on Staphylococcus cells, casein, or peptone. AB-CW3 is an aerobic bacterium feeding mainly on proteins and peptides.
2020-11-03 | PXD021036 | Pride
Project description:Illumina 1M Omni Quad arrays were used to test mutation calling accuracy of qSNP tool (a mutation caller) Ilumina array genotypes with GenCal (GC score)>0.70 were used in the comparison of genotype calls using next generation sequencing data and qSNP (mutation caller) 2 samples (control cell line and Melanoma cell line). This is the data for a validation step. contributor: Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative
2014-06-13 | E-GEOD-47904 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Next generation sequencing platforms have become essential tools for understanding DNA in a wide range of contexts. Their success heavily relies on the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of methods used to discern differences between the reference genome and genomes under investigation. Here we compare the relative performances of five popular single nucleotide variant callers with and without their associated recommended hard filtering criteria. We compare: FreeBayes; the Genome Analysis Toolkit’s Haplotype Caller and Unified Genotyper; SAMtools; and VarScan. We tailor this comparison to suit smaller projects with modest sample numbers (n = 10) and coverage (~10X) to fill a current gap in the literature. Other comparison studies are generally applicable only to larger projects in model species, where there is access to large amounts of sequencing data and curated callsets for base and variant quality score recalibration. We estimated the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of each pipeline according to the genotype concordance rate and number with the “truth” dataset for 10 canine samples. The truth dataset was defined as genotypes obtained from the CanineHD BeadChip array. Whole genome sequencing data was performed on the Illumina HiSeq2000 or HiSeq2500 platform as 100-101 base pair, paired end reads to an average sample coverage of 10.3X. Apart from GATK Haplotype Caller, applying recommended hard filters did not improve the performance of genotyping concordance at the tested levels of minimum coverage. The default VarScan pipeline with no additional filters applied (VarScan uses SAMtools mpileup, without base alignment quality computation) generally outperformed other callers in terms of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. The results of this study demonstrate that hard filtering of variant calls from low-powered genome studies can impair accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of callsets and provides some benchmark performance metrics on a range of low coverage levels.
2018-08-31 | GSE117010 | GEO
Project description:A popular method for peptide quantification relies on isobaric labeling such as tandem mass tags (TMT) which enables multiplexed proteome analyses. Quantification is achieved by reporter ions generated by fragmentation in a tandem mass spectrometer. However, with higher degrees of multiplexing, the smaller mass differences between the reporter ions increase the mass resolving power requirements. This contrasts with faster peptide sequencing capabilities enabled by lowered mass resolution on Orbitrap instruments. It is therefore important to determine the mass resolution limits for highly multiplexed quantification when maximizing proteome depth. Here we defined the lower boundaries for resolving TMT reporter ions with 0.0063 Da mass differences using an ultra-high-field Orbitrap mass spectrometer. We found the optimal method depends on the relative ratio between closely spaced reporter ions and that 64 ms transient acquisition time provided sufficient resolving power for separating TMT reporter ions with absolute ratio changes up to 16-fold. Furthermore, a 32 ms transient processed with phase-constrained spectrum deconvolution provides >50% more identifications with >99% quantified, but with a slight loss in quantification precision and accuracy. These findings should guide decisions on what Orbitrap resolution settings to use in future proteomics experiments relying on isobaric TMT reporter ion quantification.
2018-10-05 | PXD011009 | Pride
Project description:DNA sequencing is a critical tool in modern biology. Over the last two decades, it has been revolutionized by the advent of massively parallel sequencing, leading to significant advances in genome and transcriptome sequencing of various organisms. Nevertheless, challenges such as accuracy, lack of competitive options and prohibitive costs associated with high throughput parallel short-read sequencing persist. Here, we conduct a comparative analysis between the Element Biosciences AVITI platform and its counterpart the Illumina NextSeq platform, testing DNA and RNA short-read sequencing, as well as synthetic long-read sequencing for single cells and RNA transcripts.
2024-08-19 | GSE246836 | GEO
Project description:DNA sequencing is a critical tool in modern biology. Over the last two decades, it has been revolutionized by the advent of massively parallel sequencing, leading to significant advances in genome and transcriptome sequencing of various organisms. Nevertheless, challenges such as accuracy, lack of competitive options and prohibitive costs associated with high throughput parallel short-read sequencing persist. Here, we conduct a comparative analysis between the Element Biosciences AVITI platform and its counterpart the Illumina NextSeq platform, testing DNA and RNA short-read sequencing, as well as synthetic long-read sequencing for single cells and RNA transcripts.
2024-08-19 | GSE246835 | GEO