The interaction of PRC2 with RNA or chromatin is mutually antagonistic
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA278055 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR1914040.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR1914060.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR1914041.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR1914061.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR1914022_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 42 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) modifies chromatin to maintain genes in a repressed state during development. PRC2 is primarily associated with CpG islands at repressed genes and also possesses RNA binding activity. However, the RNAs that bind PRC2 in cells, the subunits that mediate these interactions, and the role of RNA in PRC2 recruitment to chromatin all remain unclear. By performing iCLIP for PRC2 in comparison with other RNA binding proteins, we show here that PRC2 binds nascent RNA at essentially all active genes. Although interacting with RNA promiscuously, PRC2 binding is enriched at specific locations within RNAs, primarily exon-intron boundaries and the 3’UTR. Deletion of other PRC2 subunits reveals that SUZ12 is sufficient to establish this RNA binding profile. Contrary to prevailing models, we also demonstrate that the interaction of PRC2 with RNA or chromatin is mutually antagonistic in cells and in vitro. RNA degradation in cells triggers PRC2 recruitment to CpG islands at active genes. Correspondingly, release of PRC2 from chromatin in cells increases RNA binding. Consistent with this, RNA and nucleosomes compete for PRC2 binding in vitro. We propose that RNA prevents PRC2 recruitment to chromatin at active genes and that mutual antagonism between RNA and chromatin underlies the pattern of PRC2 chromatin association across the genome.
2016-05-06 | GSE66831 | GEO
Project description:Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) maintains developmental regulator genes in a repressed state through methylation of histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27me3) and is necessary for cell differentiation. We and others have previously found that the PRC2 subunit Suz12 interacts with RNA in vitro and other studies have shown that Ezh2 and Jarid2 also possess RNA binding function. The interaction of PRC2 with RNA has been suggested to regulate PRC2 targeting or enzymatic activity, but the RNAs directly bound by PRC2 in cells, and the role of each PRC2 RNA binding subunit, remain unclear. We have used different CLIP techniques, which use UV-crosslinking to allow detection of direct Suz12-RNA interactions as they occur in living mouse ES cells. Suz12 binds nascent RNA and has a preference for interaction with the 3’UTR, showing it does have binding specificity in cells. RNAs bound by Suz12 at the 3’UTR encode developmental regulator genes. Suz12 remains bound to RNA upon deletion of Ezh2 or Jarid2 showing that it binds RNA independently of other PRC2 subunits. We also show that binding of Suz12 to RNA or chromatin is mutually inhibitory. Although Ezh2 and Jarid2 also bind RNA, Ezh2 and Jarid2 deletion causes an increase in Suz12 RNA binding, without changing its specificity, which reflects the loss of Suz12 from chromatin. Similarly, disruption of Suz12-RNA interactions by RNA polymerase II inhibition or RNase treatment increases Suz12 binding to chromatin. These results therefore suggest that Suz12 acts as an RNA sensor, binding to the 3’UTR of nascent RNAs and modulating the interaction of PRC2 with chromatin.
2016-05-06 | GSE66830 | GEO
Project description:Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) maintains developmental regulator genes in a repressed state through methylation of histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27me3) and is necessary for cell differentiation. We and others have previously found that the PRC2 subunit Suz12 interacts with RNA in vitro and other studies have shown that Ezh2 and Jarid2 also possess RNA binding function. The interaction of PRC2 with RNA has been suggested to regulate PRC2 targeting or enzymatic activity, but the RNAs directly bound by PRC2 in cells, and the role of each PRC2 RNA binding subunit, remain unclear. We have used different CLIP techniques, which use UV-crosslinking to allow detection of direct Suz12-RNA interactions as they occur in living mouse ES cells. Suz12 binds nascent RNA and has a preference for interaction with the 3’UTR, showing it does have binding specificity in cells. RNAs bound by Suz12 at the 3’UTR encode developmental regulator genes. Suz12 remains bound to RNA upon deletion of Ezh2 or Jarid2 showing that it binds RNA independently of other PRC2 subunits. We also show that binding of Suz12 to RNA or chromatin is mutually inhibitory. Although Ezh2 and Jarid2 also bind RNA, Ezh2 and Jarid2 deletion causes an increase in Suz12 RNA binding, without changing its specificity, which reflects the loss of Suz12 from chromatin. Similarly, disruption of Suz12-RNA interactions by RNA polymerase II inhibition or RNase treatment increases Suz12 binding to chromatin. These results therefore suggest that Suz12 acts as an RNA sensor, binding to the 3’UTR of nascent RNAs and modulating the interaction of PRC2 with chromatin.
2016-05-06 | GSE66829 | GEO
Project description:Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) maintains developmental regulator genes in a repressed state through methylation of histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27me3) and is necessary for cell differentiation. We and others have previously found that the PRC2 subunit Suz12 interacts with RNA in vitro and other studies have shown that Ezh2 and Jarid2 also possess RNA binding function. The interaction of PRC2 with RNA has been suggested to regulate PRC2 targeting or enzymatic activity, but the RNAs directly bound by PRC2 in cells, and the role of each PRC2 RNA binding subunit, remain unclear. We have used different CLIP techniques, which use UV-crosslinking to allow detection of direct Suz12-RNA interactions as they occur in living mouse ES cells. Suz12 binds nascent RNA and has a preference for interaction with the 3’UTR, showing it does have binding specificity in cells. RNAs bound by Suz12 at the 3’UTR encode developmental regulator genes. Suz12 remains bound to RNA upon deletion of Ezh2 or Jarid2 showing that it binds RNA independently of other PRC2 subunits. We also show that binding of Suz12 to RNA or chromatin is mutually inhibitory. Although Ezh2 and Jarid2 also bind RNA, Ezh2 and Jarid2 deletion causes an increase in Suz12 RNA binding, without changing its specificity, which reflects the loss of Suz12 from chromatin. Similarly, disruption of Suz12-RNA interactions by RNA polymerase II inhibition or RNase treatment increases Suz12 binding to chromatin. These results therefore suggest that Suz12 acts as an RNA sensor, binding to the 3’UTR of nascent RNAs and modulating the interaction of PRC2 with chromatin.
2016-05-06 | GSE66814 | GEO
Project description:Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) modifies chromatin to maintain genes in a repressed state during development. PRC2 is primarily associated with CpG islands at repressed genes and also possesses RNA binding activity. However, the RNAs that bind PRC2 in cells, the subunits that mediate these interactions, and the role of RNA in PRC2 recruitment to chromatin all remain unclear. By performing iCLIP for PRC2 in comparison with other RNA binding proteins, we show here that PRC2 binds nascent RNA at essentially all active genes. Although interacting with RNA promiscuously, PRC2 binding is enriched at specific locations within RNAs, primarily exon-intron boundaries and the 3' UTR. Deletion of other PRC2 subunits reveals that SUZ12 is sufficient to establish this RNA binding profile. Contrary to prevailing models, we also demonstrate that the interaction of PRC2 with RNA or chromatin is mutually antagonistic in cells and in vitro. RNA degradation in cells triggers PRC2 recruitment to CpG islands at active genes. Correspondingly, the release of PRC2 from chromatin in cells increases RNA binding. Consistent with this, RNA and nucleosomes compete for PRC2 binding in vitro. We propose that RNA prevents PRC2 recruitment to chromatin at active genes and that mutual antagonism between RNA and chromatin underlies the pattern of PRC2 chromatin association across the genome.
| S-EPMC4937559 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The interaction of PRC2 with RNA or chromatin is mutually antagonistic [iCLIP-Seq]
| PRJNA278057 | ENA
Project description:The interaction of PRC2 with RNA or chromatin is mutually antagonistic [RNA-Seq]
| PRJNA278058 | ENA
Project description:The interaction of PRC2 with RNA or chromatin is mutually antagonistic [ChIP-Seq]
| PRJNA278059 | ENA
Project description:Eukaryotic chromatin is separated into functional domains differentiated by posttranslational histone modifications, histone variants, and DNA methylation. Methylation is associated with repression of transcriptional initiation in plants and animals, and is frequently found in transposable elements. Proper methylation patterns are critical for eukaryotic development, and aberrant methylation-induced silencing of tumor suppressor genes is a common feature of human cancer. In contrast to methylation, the histone variant H2A.Z is preferentially deposited by the Swr1 ATPase complex near 5' ends of genes where it promotes transcriptional competence. How DNA methylation and H2A.Z influence transcription remains largely unknown. Here we show that in the plant Arabidopsis thaliana, regions of DNA methylation are quantitatively deficient in H2A.Z. Exclusion of H2A.Z is seen at sites of DNA methylation in the bodies of actively transcribed genes and in methylated transposons. Mutation of the MET1 DNA methyltransferase, which causes both losses and gains of DNA methylation, engenders opposite changes in H2A.Z deposition, while mutation of the PIE1 subunit of the Swr1 complex that deposits H2A.Z17 leads to genome-wide hypermethylation. Our findings indicate that DNA methylation can influence chromatin structure and effect gene silencing by excluding H2A.Z, and that H2A.Z protects genes from DNA methylation. Keywords: Affinity-purification on microarray All experiments were done using two channels per chip. DNA methylation experiments compared immunoprecipitated, methylated DNA to control genomic DNA. H2A.Z experiments compared whole micrococcal nuclease-treated affinity-purified chromatin to input chromatin used for affinity purification. Affinity purification was performed using either biotin-tagged H2A.Z, pulled down using streptavidin, or endogenous H2A.Z pulled down using an anti-H2A.Z antibody.
2008-10-02 | E-GEOD-12212 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:A methionine substitution at lysine 27 on histone H3 variants (H3K27M) characterizes ~80% of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG) and inhibits PRC2 in a dominant negative fashion. Yet, the mechanisms for this inhibition and abnormal epigenomic landscape have not been resolved. Using quantitative proteomics, we discovered that robust PRC2 inhibition requires levels of H3K27M greatly exceeding those of PRC2, seen in DIPG. While PRC2 inhibition requires interaction with H3K27M, we found this interaction on chromatin is transient with PRC2 largely being released from H3K27M. Unexpectedly, inhibition persisted even after PRC2 dissociated from H3K27M-chromatin suggesting a lasting impact on PRC2. Furthermore, allosterically activated PRC2 is particularly sensitive to K27M leading to a failure to spread H3K27me3 at distinct foci. In turn, levels of Polycomb antagonists such as H3K36me2 are elevated suggesting a more global, downstream effect on the epigenome. Together, these findings reveal the conditions required for H3K27M-mediated PRC2 inhibition and reconcile seemingly paradoxical effects of H3K27M on PRC2 recruitment and activity.
2018-08-31 | GSE118954 | GEO