Mus musculus
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA315817 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR3269870.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR3269880.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR3269890_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR3269890_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR3269900_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 150 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Integrative analysis of 3D nucleome and chromatin accessibility reveals a chromatin barrier established for T-lineage commitment during early T cell development [ChIP-Seq]
| PRJNA317302 | ENA
Project description:Integrative analysis of 3D nucleome and chromatin accessibility reveals a chromatin barrier established for T-lineage commitment during early T cell development
| PRJNA317301 | ENA
Project description:Hematopoiesis consists of step-wise commitment of multiple distinct intermediate differentiation stages before mature blood cells are generated. Although extensive studies have been performed on regulatory pathways in mature blood cells, few have examined chromatin reorganization underlying the changes in transcription programs from early progenitors of hematopoiesis to mature immune cells. In particular, what roles chromatin organization plays in the cell fate commitment during the differentiation of early hematopoietic progenitor cells to committed T cells remains unclear. Here, we carried out an integrative analysis of 3D nucleome, chromatin accessibility and gene expression from hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) to CD4/CD8 double positive (DP) T cells. Analysis of these data sets revealed extensive reorganization of A/B compartments, topologically associating domains (TADs), and chromatin accessibility at transcriptional regulatory regions during the development process. Remarkably, all three levels of chromatin organization display a monotonic pattern of change. While gradual and progressive changes in chromatin reorganization was observed at most development stages, an abrupt genome-wide change in A/B compartment structure, TAD domain scores and chromatin accessibility occurred during the transition from double negative stage 2 (DN2) to DN3, which was accompanied with the loss of cell fate plasticity of DN3 to differentiate to alternative lineages, suggesting that a chromatin barrier is established at the DN3 stage to lock the cells in the T cell fate. This chromatin barrier may be reinforced by another genome-wide reorganization of chromatin at the DN4-to-DP transition. The binding of PU.1, a key factor for the fate choice of early progenitor cells, and BCL11B, critically required for T cell commitment at later stages, was associated with increased long-distance interaction and chromatin accessibility. Deletion of Bcl11b led to decreased chromatin interaction for BCL11B target genes, suggesting that it may contribute to the establishment of the 3D nucleome structure required for the lineage differentiation and commitment.
2018-02-20 | GSE79422 | GEO
Project description:Hematopoiesis consists of step-wise commitment of multiple distinct intermediate differentiation stages before mature blood cells are generated1,2. Early progenitor cells have multiple cell fate potentials and retain plasticity to differentiate to alternative lineages, while later stages are fully committed to certain cell lineages and rarely alter their fates3,4. Although extensive studies have been performed on regulatory pathways in mature blood cells5-8, few have examined chromatin re-organization underlying the transcription programs in early progenitors of hematopoiesis. In particular, what roles chromatin organization plays in the cell fate commitment during the differentiation of early hematopoietic progenitor cells remains unclear. Here, we carried out an integrative analysis of 3D nucleome, chromatin accessibility and gene expression during early T cell development from hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) to CD4/CD8 double positive (DP) T cells. Analysis of these data sets revealed extensive A/B compartment flips and dynamic changes of chromatin accessibility at regulatory regions including promoters and enhancers during the development process. Remarkably, both the compartment flip and changes in chromatin accessibility display a monotonic pattern. While gradual and progressive changes in chromatin re-organization was observed at most development stages, an abrupt and striking genome-wide change in A/B compartment structure and chromatin accessibility occurred during the transition from double negative stage 2 (DN2) to DN3, which was accompanied with the loss of cell fate plasticity of DN3 to differentiate to alternative lineages, suggesting that a chromatin barrier is established at the DN3 stage to lock the cells in the T cell fate. The binding of PU.1, a key factor for the fate choice of early progenitor cells, and BCL11B, critically required for T cell commitment at late stages, was associated with increased long-distance interaction and chromatin accessibility and may coordinately contribute to the establishment of the 3D nucleome structure required for the lineage differentiation and commitment.
2018-02-20 | GSE79874 | GEO
Project description:Nucleosome structure and positioning play pivotal roles in gene regulation, DNA repair and other essential processes in eukaryotic cells. Nucleosomal DNA is thought to be uniformly inaccessible to DNA binding and processing factors, such as MNase. Here, we show, however, that nucleosome accessibility and sensitivity to MNase varies. Digestion of Drosophila chromatin with two distinct concentrations of MNase revealed two types of nucleosomes: sensitive and resistant. MNase-resistant nucleosome arrays are less accessible to low concentrations of MNase, whereas MNase-sensitive arrays are degraded by high concentrations. MNase-resistant nucleosomes assemble on sequences depleted of A/T and enriched in G/C containing dinucleotides. In contrast, MNase-sensitive nucleosomes form on A/T rich sequences represented by transcription start and termination sites, enhancers and DNase hypersensitive sites. Lowering of cell growth temperature to ~10°C stabilizes MNase-sensitive nucleosomes suggesting that variations in sensitivity to MNase are related to either thermal fluctuations in chromatin fiber or the activity of enzymatic machinery. In the vicinity of active genes and DNase hypersensitive sites nucleosomes are organized into synchronous, periodic arrays. These patterns are likely to be caused by “phasing” nucleosomes off a potential barrier formed by DNA-bound factors and we provide an extensive biophysical framework to explain this effect. Mnase-seq, Mnase-ChIP-seq of Drosophila melanogaster embryo and S2 cells chromatin
2015-09-17 | E-GEOD-69177 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Nucleosome structure and positioning play pivotal roles in gene regulation, DNA repair and other essential processes in eukaryotic cells. Nucleosomal DNA is thought to be uniformly inaccessible to DNA binding and processing factors, such as MNase. Here, we show, however, that nucleosome accessibility and sensitivity to MNase varies. Digestion of Drosophila chromatin with two distinct concentrations of MNase revealed two types of nucleosomes: sensitive and resistant. MNase-resistant nucleosome arrays are less accessible to low concentrations of MNase, whereas MNase-sensitive arrays are degraded by high concentrations. MNase-resistant nucleosomes assemble on sequences depleted of A/T and enriched in G/C containing dinucleotides. In contrast, MNase-sensitive nucleosomes form on A/T rich sequences represented by transcription start and termination sites, enhancers and DNase hypersensitive sites. Lowering of cell growth temperature to ~10°C stabilizes MNase-sensitive nucleosomes suggesting that variations in sensitivity to MNase are related to either thermal fluctuations in chromatin fiber or the activity of enzymatic machinery. In the vicinity of active genes and DNase hypersensitive sites nucleosomes are organized into synchronous, periodic arrays. These patterns are likely to be caused by “phasing” nucleosomes off a potential barrier formed by DNA-bound factors and we provide an extensive biophysical framework to explain this effect. RNA-seq S2 cells Drosophila melanogaster
2015-09-17 | E-GEOD-69335 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We develop a technique, named MNase hypersensitivity sequencing (MH-seq), to identify genomic regions associated with open chromatin in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genomic regions enriched with MH-seq reads are referred as MNase hypersensitive sites (MHSs). MHSs overlap with the majority (~90%) of the open chromatin identified previously by DNase-seq and ATAC-seq. Surprisingly, 22% MHSs are not covered by DNase-seq or ATAC-seq reads, which are referred to “specific MHSs” (sMHSs). sMHSs tend to be located away from promoters and a substantial portion of sMHSs are derived from transposable elements. Most interestingly, genomic regions containing sMHSs are enriched with epigenetic marks, including H3K27me3 and DNA methylation. In addition, sMHSs show a number of distinct characteristics including association with transcriptional repressors. Thus, sMHSs span distinct classes of open chromatin that may not be accessible to DNase I or Tn5. We hypothesize that the small size of the MNase enzyme relative to DNase I or Tn5 allows its access to relatively more condensed chromatin domains.
2019-12-22 | GSE142495 | GEO
Project description:Nucleosome structure and positioning play pivotal roles in gene regulation, DNA repair and other essential processes in eukaryotic cells. Nucleosomal DNA is thought to be uniformly inaccessible to DNA binding and processing factors, such as MNase. Here, we show, however, that nucleosome accessibility and sensitivity to MNase varies. Digestion of Drosophila chromatin with two distinct concentrations of MNase revealed two types of nucleosomes: sensitive and resistant. MNase-resistant nucleosome arrays are less accessible to low concentrations of MNase, whereas MNase-sensitive arrays are degraded by high concentrations. MNase-resistant nucleosomes assemble on sequences depleted of A/T and enriched in G/C containing dinucleotides. In contrast, MNase-sensitive nucleosomes form on A/T rich sequences represented by transcription start and termination sites, enhancers and DNase hypersensitive sites. Lowering of cell growth temperature to ~10°C stabilizes MNase-sensitive nucleosomes suggesting that variations in sensitivity to MNase are related to either thermal fluctuations in chromatin fiber or the activity of enzymatic machinery. In the vicinity of active genes and DNase hypersensitive sites nucleosomes are organized into synchronous, periodic arrays. These patterns are likely to be caused by “phasing” nucleosomes off a potential barrier formed by DNA-bound factors and we provide an extensive biophysical framework to explain this effect.
2015-09-17 | GSE69335 | GEO
Project description:Nucleosome structure and positioning play pivotal roles in gene regulation, DNA repair and other essential processes in eukaryotic cells. Nucleosomal DNA is thought to be uniformly inaccessible to DNA binding and processing factors, such as MNase. Here, we show, however, that nucleosome accessibility and sensitivity to MNase varies. Digestion of Drosophila chromatin with two distinct concentrations of MNase revealed two types of nucleosomes: sensitive and resistant. MNase-resistant nucleosome arrays are less accessible to low concentrations of MNase, whereas MNase-sensitive arrays are degraded by high concentrations. MNase-resistant nucleosomes assemble on sequences depleted of A/T and enriched in G/C containing dinucleotides. In contrast, MNase-sensitive nucleosomes form on A/T rich sequences represented by transcription start and termination sites, enhancers and DNase hypersensitive sites. Lowering of cell growth temperature to ~10°C stabilizes MNase-sensitive nucleosomes suggesting that variations in sensitivity to MNase are related to either thermal fluctuations in chromatin fiber or the activity of enzymatic machinery. In the vicinity of active genes and DNase hypersensitive sites nucleosomes are organized into synchronous, periodic arrays. These patterns are likely to be caused by “phasing” nucleosomes off a potential barrier formed by DNA-bound factors and we provide an extensive biophysical framework to explain this effect.
2015-09-17 | GSE69177 | GEO
Project description:Nucleosomes are important for gene regulation because their arrangement on the genome can control which proteins bind to DNA. Currently, few human nucleosomes are thought to be consistently positioned across cells; however, this has been difficult to assess due to the limited resolution of existing data. We performed paired-end sequencing of micrococcal nuclease-digested chromatin (MNase-seq) from seven lymphoblastoid cell lines and mapped over 3.6 billion MNase-seq fragments to the human genome to create the highest-resolution map of nucleosome occupancy to date in a human cell type. In contrast to previous results, we find that most nucleosomes have more consistent positioning than expected by chance and a substantial fraction (8.7%) of nucleosomes have moderate to strong positioning. In aggregate, nucleosome sequences have 10 bp periodic patterns in dinucleotide frequency and DNase I sensitivity; and, across cells, nucleosomes frequently have translational offsets that are multiples of 10 bp. We estimate that almost half of the genome contains regularly spaced arrays of nucleosomes, which are enriched in active chromatin domains. Single nucleotide polymorphisms that reduce DNase I sensitivity can disrupt the phasing of nucleosome arrays, which indicates that they often result from positioning against a barrier formed by other proteins. However, nucleosome arrays can also be created by DNA sequence alone. The most striking example is an array of over 400 nucleosomes on chromosome 12 that is created by tandem repetition of sequences with strong positioning properties. In summary, a large fraction of nucleosomes are consistently positioned-in some regions because they adopt favored sequence positions, and in other regions because they are forced into specific arrangements by chromatin remodeling or DNA binding proteins. MNase-seq of 7 human lymphoblastoid cell lines from the HapMap project
2012-08-01 | E-GEOD-36979 | biostudies-arrayexpress