Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Leptospira interrogans serovar Canicola strain:RUFN

ABSTRACT: Leptospira interrogans serovar Canicola strain:RUFN Genome sequencing and assembly

PROVIDER: PRJNA376501 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	GCA_002269235.1_sequence_report.txt	Txt

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Analysis of the human endothelial cell response to pathogenic Leptospira interrogans vs. non-pathogenic Leptospira biflexa (HMEC data)

2010-07-27 | GSE23173 | GEO

Analysis of the human endothelial cell response to pathogenic Leptospira interrogans vs. non-pathogenic Leptospira biflexa (Eahy1 data)

2010-07-27 | GSE23172 | GEO

Analysis of the human endothelial cell response to pathogenic Leptospira interrogans vs. non-pathogenic Leptospira biflexa (HMEC data)

Project description:The overall goal of these experiments was to determine how human endothelial cells respond to pathogenic Leptospira interrogans. Leptospira interrogans causes leptospirosis, the most widespread zoonotic infection in the world. A hallmark of leptospirosis is widespread endothelial damage, which in severe cases leads to hemorrhage. In these experiments, we infected two endothelial cell lines with pathogenic Leptospira interrogans serovar Canicola strain Ca12-005, and as controls, with the non-pathogenic Leptospira biflexa serovar Patoc strain Pfra. As additional controls, uninfected cells were also included in the analyses. The cell line used fhere was a microvascular endothelial line, HMEC (Ades et al, 1992. HMEC-1: establishment of an immortalized human microvascular endothelial cell line. J Invest Dermatol. 99:683-690); due to loss of the original analysis files, only raw data files are provided. Infection times were performed at a multiplicity of infection (# bacteria/endothelial cell) of 10 for either 1 hour or 3 hours, after which RNA was harvested and reverse transcribed. Labeled cDNAs were used to probe HEEBO arrays purchased from Microarrays Inc. (Nashville, TN). In each of three biological replicate experiments, for each time point, three comparisons were made. First, the L. interrogans-infected cells were compared to the L. biflexa-infected cells. Second, the L. Interrogans-infected cells were compared to the uninfected cells. Third, the L. biflexa-infected cells were compared to the uninfected cells. A second endothelial cell line,

2010-07-27 | E-GEOD-23173 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Leptospira interrogans serovar Canicola strain:782

Project description:Leptospira interrogans serovar Canicola strain:782 Genome sequencing

| PRJNA564737 | ENA

Leptospira interrogans serovar Canicola strain:114

Project description:Leptospira interrogans serovar Canicola strain:114 Genome sequencing and assembly

| PRJNA376496 | ENA

Leptospira interrogans serovar Canicola strain:769341

Project description:Leptospira interrogans serovar Canicola strain:769341 Genome sequencing and assembly

| PRJNA787420 | ENA

Leptospira interrogans serovar Canicola strain:Tande

Project description:Leptospira interrogans serovar Canicola strain:Tande Genome sequencing and assembly

| PRJNA324283 | ENA

Analysis of the human endothelial cell response to pathogenic Leptospira interrogans vs. non-pathogenic Leptospira biflexa (Eahy1 data)

Project description:The overall goal of these experiments was to determine how human endothelial cells respond to pathogenic Leptospira interrogans. Leptospira interrogans causes leptospirosis, the most widespread zoonotic infection in the world. A hallmark of leptospirosis is widespread endothelial damage, which in severe cases leads to hemorrhage. In these experiments, we infected two endothelial cell lines with pathogenic Leptospira interrogans serovar Canicola strain Ca12-005, and as controls, with the non-pathogenic Leptospira biflexa serovar Patoc strain Pfra. As additional controls, uninfected cells were also included in the analyses. The cell line used was Ea.hy926, a macrovascular line (Edgell, C. J.,et al. 1990. In vitro Cell. & Dev. Biol. 26:1167-1172, and Edgell, C. J., et al. 1983. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 80:3734-3737). Infection times were performed at a multiplicity of infection (# bacteria/endothelial cell) of 10 for either 1 hour or 3 hours, after which RNA was harvested and reverse transcribed. Labeled cDNAs were used to probe HEEBO arrays purchased from Microarrays Inc. (Nashville, TN). In each of three biological replicate experiments, for each time point, three comparisons were made. First, the L. interrogans-infected cells were compared to the L. biflexa-infected cells. Second, the L. Interrogans-infected cells were compared to the uninfected cells. Third, the L. biflexa-infected cells were compared to the uninfected cells. A second endothelial cell line, HMEC (Ades et al, 1992. HMEC-1: establishment of an immortalized human microvascular endothelial cell line. J Invest Dermatol. 99:683-690), which is of microvascular origin, was also used; raw data files are provided separately.

2010-07-27 | E-GEOD-23172 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Leptospira interrogans serovar Canicola str. Gui44

Project description:Leptospira interrogans serovar Canicola str. Gui44 Genome sequencing

| PRJNA230675 | ENA

Leptospira interrogans serovar Canicola str. Gui44

Project description:Leptospira interrogans serovar Canicola str. Gui44 Genome sequencing

| PRJNA232555 | ENA