Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Melopsittacus undulatus

ABSTRACT: Melopsittacus undulatus pigmentation trait mapping

PROVIDER: PRJNA378643 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR5331890.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR5332010.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR5332020.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR5332030.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR5332040.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 286

Similar Datasets

Melopsittacus undulatus

Project description:Melopsittacus undulatus

| PRJNA703802 | ENA

Melopsittacus undulatus

Project description:Melopsittacus undulatus Hi-C-based physical map

| PRJNA378785 | ENA

Melopsittacus undulatus isolate:bMelUnd1

Project description:Melopsittacus undulatus (budgerigar) genome, bMelUnd1, paternal haplotype

| PRJNA561963 | ENA

Melopsittacus undulatus isolate:bMelUnd1

Project description:Melopsittacus undulatus (budgerigar) genome, bMelUnd1, maternal haplotype

| PRJNA561964 | ENA

Melopsittacus undulatus isolate:bMelUnd1

Project description:Melopsittacus undulatus (budgerigar) genome, bMelUnd1, maternal haplotype with paternal Z

| PRJNA612327 | ENA

Melopsittacus undulatus isolate:Mr. B

Project description:Melopsittacus undulatus isolate:Mr. B Genome sequencing and assembly

| PRJNA72527 | ENA

Edge detection in landing budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Project description:BACKGROUND: While considerable scientific effort has been devoted to studying how birds navigate over long distances, relatively little is known about how targets are detected, obstacles are avoided and smooth landings are orchestrated. Here we examine how visual features in the environment, such as contrasting edges, determine where a bird will land. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Landing in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) was investigated by training them to fly from a perch to a feeder, and video-filming their landings. The feeder was placed on a grey disc that produced a contrasting edge against a uniformly blue background. We found that the birds tended to land primarily at the edge of the disc and walk to the feeder, even though the feeder was in the middle of the disc. This suggests that the birds were using the visual contrast at the boundary of the disc to target their landings. When the grey level of the disc was varied systematically, whilst keeping the blue background constant, there was one intermediate grey level at which the budgerigar's preference for the disc boundary disappeared. The budgerigars then landed randomly all over the test surface. Even though this disc is (for humans) clearly distinguishable from the blue background, it offers very little contrast against the background, in the red and green regions of the spectrum. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that budgerigars use visual edges to target and guide landings. Calculations of photoreceptor excitation reveal that edge detection in landing budgerigars is performed by a color-blind luminance channel that sums the signals from the red and green photoreceptors, or, alternatively, receives input from the red double-cones. This finding has close parallels to vision in honeybees and primates, where edge detection and motion perception are also largely color-blind.

| S-EPMC2752810 | biostudies-literature

Cognition, personality, and stress in budgerigars, <i>Melopsittacus undulatus</i>.

Project description:To study the fitness effects of individual variation in cognitive traits, it is paramount to understand whether traits such as personality and physiological stress influence cognitive performance. We first tested whether budgerigars showed both consistent personalities and cognitive performance across time and tasks. We tested object and food neophobia, and exploratory behavior. We measured cognitive performance in habituation, ability to solve foraging problems, spatial memory, and seed discrimination tasks. Budgerigars showed consistency in their neophobic tendencies and these tendencies were associated with their exploratory behavior. Birds were also consistent in how they performed in most of the cognitive tasks (temporal consistency), but were not consistent in their performance across tasks (context consistency). Neither corticosterone levels (baseline and stress-induced) showed a significant relationship with either cognitive or personality measures. Neophobic and exploratory tendencies determined the willingness of birds to engage only in the seed discrimination task. Such tendencies also had a significant effect on problem-solving ability. Our results suggest that consistent individual differences in cognitive performance along with consistent differences in personality could determine response to environmental change and therefore have important fitness consequences.

| S-EPMC5872908 | biostudies-literature

Melopsittacus undulatus

Project description:The budgerigar is a small Australian parrot

| PRJNA72615 | ENA

Holcosus undulatus

Project description:Holcosus undulatus

| PRJNA1169564 | ENA