Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

California Current System Long Term Ecological Research P1604 (CCS_LTER_P1604)

ABSTRACT: California Current System Long Term Ecological Research P1604 (CCS_LTER_P1604) Targeted loci environmental

PROVIDER: PRJNA422420 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR7015930_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR7015930_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR7015940_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR7015940_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR7015950_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 62

Similar Datasets

California Current System Long Term Ecological Research P1604 (CCS_LTER_P1604)

Project description:California Current System Long Term Ecological Research P1604 (CCS_LTER_P1604) 18S_v9 Data

| PRJNA445287 | ENA

Euphotic marine water from the Southern California Current System

Project description:Euphotic marine water from the Southern California Current System Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA831817 | ENA

Phytoplankton transcriptomic and physiological responses to fixed nitrogen in the California Current System

Project description:In summer 2014, we conducted experiments to determine the effects of different N substrates on phytoplankton communities in the North Pacific Ocean and in the transition zone of the California Current and gyre (Shilova, Mills et al., 2017). Samples were incubated with nitrate, ammonium, urea, and filtered deep water (FDW) for 48 hours (T48). Two treatments added iron, alone (Fe) or with a mix of N substrates (N+Fe), to determine the effects of Fe on the utilization of N substrates. All treatments resulted in changes in phytoplankton cell abundances and photosynthetic activity at both locations, with differences between phytoplankton groups. Prochlorococcus had large increases in biomass in response to ammonium and urea, while both eukaryotic phytoplankton and Synechococcus had only modest biomass increases in response to N+Fe and FDW. Moreover, distinct physiological responses were observed within sub-populations of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. In order to understand the variable responses to N substrates among phytoplankton groups and sub-populations in the California Current transition zone, the present work examines transcriptional changes that occurred 24 h after the substrates were added. Specifically, we hypothesize that transcription changes at 24 h indicate which phytoplankton taxa are N-limited, and thus help explain changes in cell abundances and photosynthetic activity by individual phytoplankton groups observed at 48 h. Furthermore, we hypothesize that the diversity in physiological responses within Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus are evident in the transcriptional responses measured at sub-population resolution.

2020-04-12 | GSE130464 | GEO

DNA-SIP experiment from Central California Current

Project description:DNA-SIP experiment from Central California Current Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA391559 | ENA

GNPS California Current Ecosystem P2107 Research Cruise

Project description:DDA non-targeted LC-MS/MS, PPL-SPE extracted marine organic matter. Positive Mode. Samples taken during the P2107 CCE LTER Research Cruise onboard the R/V Revelle.

2022-08-12 | MSV000090123 | GNPS

Phytoplankton transcriptomic and physiological responses to fixed nitrogen in the California Current System

Project description:Phytoplankton transcriptomic and physiological responses to fixed nitrogen in the California Current System

| PRJNA540297 | ENA

Diversity and temporal patterns of planktonic protist assemblages at Mediterranean Long Term Ecological Research site.

Project description:Temporal diversity and community structure of the planktonic protist assemblage at the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) station MareChiara in the Gulf of Naples(Mediterranean Sea) assessed using V4 Illumina sequencing.

| PRJEB24595 | ENA

Integrating whole blood transcriptomic collection procedures into the current anti-doping testing system, including long-term storage and re-testing of anti-doping samples

Project description:Recombinant human erythropoietin administration studies involving transcriptomic approaches have demonstrated a gene-expression signature that could aid detection of blood doping. However, current anti-doping testing does not involve blood collection into tubes with RNA preservative. This study investigated if whole blood in long-term storage and whole blood leftover from standard haematological testing in short-term storage could be used for transcriptomic analysis despite lacking RNA preservative. Whole blood samples were collected from thirteen and fourteen healthy males, for long-term and short-term storage experiments. Long-term storage: whole blood collected into Tempus™ tubes and K2EDTA tubes and subjected to long-term (i.e., −80°C) storage and RNA extracted. After storage, K2EDTA tubes were thawed and extracted using GeneJET RNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania) or Tempus™ Spin RNA Isolation Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RNA quality and purity was sufficient for gene expression analysis. Principle Component Analysis of microarray and RNA-seq gene expression data for long-term storage: When comparing gene expression between blood tubes with and without RNA preservation, 6% (4058 transcripts) were differentially expressed. RNA quantity, purity and integrity was not significantly compromised from long-term storage in blood storage tubes lacking RNA preservative, indicating that transcriptomic analysis could be conducted using anti-doping samples collected or biobanked without RNA preservation.

2021-08-13 | GSE181970 | GEO

Integrating whole blood transcriptomic collection procedures into the current anti-doping testing system, including long-term storage and re-testing of anti-doping samples [Long-term]

Project description:Purpose: Recombinant human erythropoietin administration studies involving “omics” approaches have demonstrated a gene-expression signature that could aid detection of blood doping. However, current anti-doping testing does not involve blood collection into tubes with RNA preservative. This study investigated if whole blood in long-term storage could be used for transcriptomic analysis despite lacking RNA preservation. Methods: Whole blood samples were collected from thirteen male healthy individuals. Long-term storage: whole blood collected into Tempus™ tubes and K2EDTA tubes and subjected to long-term (i.e., −80°C) storage and RNA extracted. After storage, Tempus and K2EDTA tubes were thawed and extracted using Tempus™ Spin RNA Isolation Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Samples from seven subjects that presented higher RIN value (≥7) were selected for RNA_Seq analysis. Results: The experiment provided RNA quality and purity for gene expression analysis. Total of 19239 genes were mapped and the gene expression analysis showed that 658 genes were differentially expressed (which means 3.4% of mapped genes). With 269 being up-regulated and 389 down-regulated. None of the transcripts described in previous studies as biomarkers for blood doping (Durussel et al. 2016; Wang, Durussel, et al. 2017) were differently expressed. Conclusion: RNA quantity, purity and integrity was not significantly compromised from long-term storage in blood storage tubes lacking RNA stabilisation, indicating that transcriptomic/omics analysis could be conducted using anti-doping samples collected or biobanked without RNA preservation.

2021-09-03 | GSE183073 | GEO

Integrating whole blood transcriptomic collection procedures into the current anti-doping testing system, including long-term storage and re-testing of anti-doping samples [Short-term]

Project description:Purpose: Recombinant human erythropoietin administration studies involving “omics” approaches have demonstrated a gene-expression signature that could aid detection of blood doping. However, current anti-doping testing does not involve blood collection into tubes with RNA preservative. This study investigated if whole blood in short-term storage could be used for transcriptomic analysis despite lacking RNA preservation. Methods: Whole blood samples were collected from fourteen male healthy individuals. Short-term storage: whole blood collected into K2EDTA tubes and subjected to short-term (i.e., at 4°C) storage for 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours. After storage, blood from K2EDTA tubes were transferred into Tempus™ Blood tubes, and then extracted using Tempus™ Spin RNA Isolation Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Samples from four subjects of each time point that presented higher RIN value (≥7) were selected for RNA_Seq analysis. Results: The experiment provided RNA quality and purity for gene expression analysis. Considering 6-hours storage as a reference group, the number of differentially expressed genes were 19, 45 and 70 in comparison to 12, 24 and 48-hours, respectively (which means 0.37, 0.88 and 1.37% of mapped genes). Of the 19 differentially expressed genes in the comparison 6 vs. 12-hours, 9 overlapped with the 45 in the comparison 12 vs. 24-hours. Furthermore, 40 of those 45 overlapped with the 70 differentially expressed in the comparison 6 vs. 48-hours. None of the transcripts described in previous studies (Durussel et al. 2016; Wang, Durussel, et al. 2017) were differently expressed. Conclusion: RNA quantity, purity and integrity was not significantly compromised from short-term storage in blood storage tubes lacking RNA stabilisation, indicating that transcriptomic/omics analysis could be conducted using anti-doping samples collected without RNA preservation.

2021-09-03 | GSE183132 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data