Project description:This project is a proteomic comparison of Microbacterium sp. Viu2A exposed to 10 µM nitrate uranyl versus control condition without uranyl. Three sampling time points (30 min, 4h and 24h) were analyzed. The proteomics datasets were obtained using a protein database derived from the Microbacterium sp. Viu2A complete genome.
Project description:This project is a proteomic comparison of Microbacterium sp. HG3 exposed to 10 µM nitrate uranyl versus control condition without uranyl. Three sampling time points (30 min, 4h and 24h) were analyzed. The datasets were obtained using a protein database derived from the Microbacterium sp. HG3 complete genome.
Project description:The project is a proteomic comparison of Microbacterium sp. A9 exposed to 10 µM nitrate uranyl versus control condition without uranyl. Three sampling time points (30 min, 4h and 24h) were analyzed. The proteomics datasets presented here were obtained using a protein database derived from the Microbacterium sp. A9 complete genome.
Project description:This project is a proteomic comparison of Microbacterium lemovicicum Viu22 exposed to 10 µM nitrate uranyl versus control condition without uranyl. Three sampling time points (30 min, 4h and 24h) were analyzed. The proteomics datasets were obtained using a protein database derived from the Microbacterium lemovicicum Viu22 complete genome.
Project description:This project is a proteomic comparison of Microbacterium sp. A9 exposed to 10 µM nitrate uranyl versus control condition without uranyl. Three sampling time points (30 min, 4h and 24h)are analyzed.
Project description:Genomic response of C. elegans after infection with Microbacterium nematophilum.<br><br>The interaction between the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and a Gram-positive bacterial pathogen, Microbacterium nematophilum, provides a model for an innate immune response in nematodes. This pathogen adheres to the rectal and post-anal cuticle of the worm, causing slowed growth, constipation, and a defensive swelling response of rectal hypodermal cells. To explore the genomic responses that the worm activates after pathogenic attack we used microarray analysis of transcriptional changes induced after 6 hr infection, comparing virulent with avirulent infection.