Distinct constitutive and pathogen-induced transcriptional programs in dendritic cells derived from CD16- versus CD16+ monocytes
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA437144 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:Classical CD16- versus intermediate/non-classical CD16+ monocytes differ in their homing potential and immunological functions; but whether they differentiate into dendritic cells (DC) with distinct contributions to immunity against bacterial/viral pathogens remains poorly investigated. Here, we employed a systems biology approach to identify differences between CD16+ and CD16- monocyte-derived DC (MDDC) with potential clinical relevance Although both CD16+ and CD16- MDDC acquire classical DC markers in vitro, genome-wide transcriptional profiling revealed unique molecular signatures for CD16+ MDDC, including adhesion molecules (CD103), transcription factors (TCF4), enzymes (ALDH1L2), and chemokines (CCL22).
2018-11-20 | GSE111474 | GEO
Project description:In this study gene expression of human blood classical monocytes (CD14++CD16-), CD16 positive monocytes (consisting of non-classical CD14+16++ and intermediate CD14++CD16+ monocytes) and CD1c+ CD19- dendritic cells from healthy subjects were investigated. Keywords: expression profiling by array
2011-12-17 | GSE34515 | GEO
Project description:Serum-free Fibrocytes, Serum-containing Fibrocytes, CD14++CD16- Monocytes, CD14++CD16+ Monocytes, CD14+CD16++ Monocytes, Macrophages were all generated from up to 3 biological replicates from each of 3 separate donors. RNA was extracted (Ambion RNAqueous), labelled with cy3, mixed with cy5 labelled human reference (Stratagene), and hybridised to slides printed with Human AROS v4.0 oligonucleotides (Operon). Slides were scanned using a Perkin Elmer GX plus, and the data then normalised with GEPAS v4.0 and collated. Final data analysis was carried out using TMEV 4.0. SAM was performed using a 0.1% FDR. PCA were plotted from this list, and interrogation carried out using DAVID to determine pathway enrichment.
2011-01-01 | E-MEXP-2811 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Monocytes are a heterogeneous cell population with subset-specific functions and phenotypes. The differential expression of CD14 and CD16 distinguishes classical CD14++CD16-, intermediate CD14++CD16+ and non-classical CD14+CD16++ monocytes. However, CD14++CD16+ monocytes remain the most poorly characterized subset so far. Therefore we analyzed the transcriptomes of the three monocyte subsets using SuperSAGE in combination with high-throughput sequencing. Analysis of 5,487,603 tags revealed unique identifiers of CD14++CD16+ monocytes, delineating these cells from the two other monocyte subsets. CD14++CD16+ monocytes were linked to antigen processing and presentation (e.g. CD74, HLA-DR, IFI30, CTSB), to inflammation and monocyte activation (e.g. TGFB1, AIF1, PTPN6), and to angiogenesis (e.g. TIE2, CD105). Therefore we provide genetic evidence for a distinct role of CD14++CD16+ monocytes in human immunity.
2011-07-24 | GSE30811 | GEO
Project description:Human peripheral blood monocytes (Mo) consist of subsets distinguished by expression of CD16 (FCGRIII) and chemokine receptors. Classical CD16- Mo express CCR2 and migrate in response to CCL2, while a minor CD16+ Mo subset expresses CX3CR1 and migrates into tissues expressing CX3CL1. CD16+ Mo produce pro-inflammatory cytokines and are expanded in certain inflammatory conditions including HIV infection. To gain insight into the developmental relationship and functions of CD16+ and CD16- Mo, we examined transcriptional profiles of these Mo subsets in peripheral blood from healthy individuals. Of 16,328 expressed genes, 2,759 genes were differentially expressed and 228 and 250 were >2-fold upregulated and downregulated, respectively, in CD16+ compared to CD16- Mo. CD16+ Mo were distinguished by upregulation of dendritic cell (DC) (SIGLEC10, CD43, RARA) and macrophage (MF) (CSF1R/CD115, MafB, CD97, C3aR) markers together with transcripts relevant for DC-T cell interaction (CXCL16, ICAM-2, LFA-1), cell activation (LTB, TNFRSF8, LST1, IFITM1-3, HMOX1, SOD-1, WARS, MGLL), and negative regulation of the cell cycle (CDKN1C, MTSS1), whereas CD16- Mo were distinguished by upregulation of myeloid (CD14, MNDA, TREM1, CD1d, C1qR/CD93) and granulocyte markers (FPR1, GCSFR/CD114, S100A8-9/12). Differential gene expression in CD16+ and CD16- Mo was confirmed by quantitative real time RT-PCR (i.e., CD16, C3AR1, C1QR1, ICAM-2, CSF1R, CSF3R, CDKN1C, TNFRSF1, and LTB) and flow cytometry (i.e., CSF1R, CSF3R, C1QR1, C3AR1, CD1d, CD43, CXCL16, and CX3CR1). Furthermore, increased expression of RARA and KLF2 transcripts in CD16+ Mo coincided with absence of cutaneous lymphocyte associated antigen (CLA) expression, indicating potential imprinting for non-skin homing. These results suggest that CD16+ and CD16- Mo originate from a common myeloid precursor, with CD16+ Mo having a more MF- and DC-like transcription program suggesting a more advanced stage of differentiation. Distinct transcriptional programs, together with their recruitment into tissues via different mechanisms, also suggest that CD16+ and CD16- Mo give rise to functionally distinct DC and MF in vivo.
2009-08-31 | GSE16836 | GEO
Project description:Monocytes are a heterogeneous cell population with subset-specific functions and phenotypes. The differential expression of CD14 and CD16 distinguishes classical CD14++CD16-, intermediate CD14++CD16+ and non-classical CD14+CD16++ monocytes. However, CD14++CD16+ monocytes remain the most poorly characterized subset so far. Therefore we analyzed the transcriptomes of the three monocyte subsets using SuperSAGE in combination with high-throughput sequencing. Analysis of 5,487,603 tags revealed unique identifiers of CD14++CD16+ monocytes, delineating these cells from the two other monocyte subsets. CD14++CD16+ monocytes were linked to antigen processing and presentation (e.g. CD74, HLA-DR, IFI30, CTSB), to inflammation and monocyte activation (e.g. TGFB1, AIF1, PTPN6), and to angiogenesis (e.g. TIE2, CD105). Therefore we provide genetic evidence for a distinct role of CD14++CD16+ monocytes in human immunity. Human monocyte subsets (CD14++CD16-, CD14++CD16+, CD14+CD16++) were isolated from 12 healthy volunteers based on MACS technology. Total RNA from monocyte subsets was isolated and same aliquots from each donor and monocyte subset were matched for SuperSAGE. Three SuperSAGE libraries (CD14++CD16-, CD14++CD16+ and CD14+CD16++) were generated.
2011-07-24 | E-GEOD-30811 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R) pathway has immunomodulatory properties and is implicated in the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative, infectious and inflammatory diseases. Monocytes are important cells in inflammation and they consist of subsets with distinct phenotypes and biological functions. NK1R signaling is elevated in conditions that alter the balance of monocyte subsets, such as in HIV infection. In order to understand the pro-inflammatory mechanism of NK1R signaling in monocyte subsets, a transcriptome study was performed using RNA sequencing. Human primary peripheral monocytes were treated with the NK1R cognate ligand, substance P (SP), prior to being sorted into CD16- and CD16+ subsets. SP treatment led to the differential expression of 38 genes in CD16- monocytes and 12 genes in CD16+ monocytes. The canonical NF-κB pathway was activated in both subsets, as indicated by the upregulation of transcripts including IL1α, IL1β, IL6, CCL3 and CCL4. In the CD16+ monocytes, NK1R signaling led to priming of the NLRP3 inflammasome and upregulated transcripts including NLRP3 and CARD16. Alternative splicing analysis showed that NK1R signaling resulted in differential exon usage of CASP1 and CARD16 in CD16+ monocytes. SP treatment altered the properties of both CD16- and CD16+ monocytes, leading to an inflammatory response with activation of the canonical NF-κB pathway in both monocyte subsets, and priming of the NLRP3 inflammasome in the CD16+ subset.
2022-01-30 | GSE109635 | GEO
Project description:Gene expression in CD14+ and CD16+ monocytes
| PRJNA776172 | ENA
Project description:Human peripheral blood monocytes (Mo) consist of subsets distinguished by expression of CD16 (FCGRIII) and chemokine receptors. Classical CD16- Mo express CCR2 and migrate in response to CCL2, while a minor CD16+ Mo subset expresses CX3CR1 and migrates into tissues expressing CX3CL1. CD16+ Mo produce pro-inflammatory cytokines and are expanded in certain inflammatory conditions including HIV infection. To gain insight into the developmental relationship and functions of CD16+ and CD16- Mo, we examined transcriptional profiles of these Mo subsets in peripheral blood from healthy individuals. Of 16,328 expressed genes, 2,759 genes were differentially expressed and 228 and 250 were >2-fold upregulated and downregulated, respectively, in CD16+ compared to CD16- Mo. CD16+ Mo were distinguished by upregulation of dendritic cell (DC) (SIGLEC10, CD43, RARA) and macrophage (MF) (CSF1R/CD115, MafB, CD97, C3aR) markers together with transcripts relevant for DC-T cell interaction (CXCL16, ICAM-2, LFA-1), cell activation (LTB, TNFRSF8, LST1, IFITM1-3, HMOX1, SOD-1, WARS, MGLL), and negative regulation of the cell cycle (CDKN1C, MTSS1), whereas CD16- Mo were distinguished by upregulation of myeloid (CD14, MNDA, TREM1, CD1d, C1qR/CD93) and granulocyte markers (FPR1, GCSFR/CD114, S100A8-9/12). Differential gene expression in CD16+ and CD16- Mo was confirmed by quantitative real time RT-PCR (i.e., CD16, C3AR1, C1QR1, ICAM-2, CSF1R, CSF3R, CDKN1C, TNFRSF1, and LTB) and flow cytometry (i.e., CSF1R, CSF3R, C1QR1, C3AR1, CD1d, CD43, CXCL16, and CX3CR1). Furthermore, increased expression of RARA and KLF2 transcripts in CD16+ Mo coincided with absence of cutaneous lymphocyte associated antigen (CLA) expression, indicating potential imprinting for non-skin homing. These results suggest that CD16+ and CD16- Mo originate from a common myeloid precursor, with CD16+ Mo having a more MF- and DC-like transcription program suggesting a more advanced stage of differentiation. Distinct transcriptional programs, together with their recruitment into tissues via different mechanisms, also suggest that CD16+ and CD16- Mo give rise to functionally distinct DC and MF in vivo. Experiment Overall Design: Total Mo were isolated by negative selection using magnetic immunobeads (Monocyte Isolation Kit II, Miltenyi). CD16+ and CD16- Mo fractions were further isolated using CD16 magnetic immunobeads (Miltenyi). Total RNA from Mo pellets was isolated by Trizol extraction and purified using RNeasy columns (Qiagen). The quality of RNA was assessed by visualization of intact bands corresponding to 18S and 28S rRNA on formaldehyde agarose gels. Total RNA (10 µg) from matched CD16+ and CD16- Mo samples isolated from 4 different healthy donors was quality tested using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer chip, reverse transcribed, and hybridized on the GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array (Affymetrix), which includes 54,000 probe sets on a single array (i.e., 47,000 transcripts and variants, including 38,500 well-characterized human genes). Primary data analysis performed using GeneSpring software (Biopolymer core facility, Harvard Medical School) generated Excel spreadsheets with relative gene expression values for the 4 matched CD16+ and CD16- Mo subsets.
2009-09-15 | E-GEOD-16836 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The aim of our work was to evaluate what happens to the two most polar subpopulations of peripheral blood monocytes in women diagnosed preeclampsia in comparison with physiological pregnancy. We used microarrays for comparison of CD14+ and CD16+ monocytes from patients with preeclampsia and women with physiological pregnancy
2021-10-31 | GSE186819 | GEO