Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Plasma small RNASeq comparison with Illumina TruSeq and Biooscientific NextFlex

ABSTRACT: Plasma small RNASeq comparison with Illumina TruSeq and Biooscientific NextFlex

PROVIDER: PRJNA449856 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Plasma small RNASeq comparison with Illumina TruSeq and Biooscientific NextFlex

Project description:Comparison of small RNA sequencing for 5.0, 3.0, 2.0, 1.0, 0.5, and 0.2 ml starting volumes of plasma

2018-04-13 | GSE113044 | GEO

Fractionation RNAseq in conjunction with Illumina TRUseq method

Project description:Fractionation RNAseq in conjunction with Illumina TRUseq method

| PRJEB31786 | ENA

Systematic evaluation of RNA-Seq preparation protocol performance (RNASeq: TruSeq)

Project description:In this study, we present a comprehensive evaluation of four RNA-Seq library preparation methods. We used three standard input protocols, the Illumina TruSeq Stranded Total RNA and TruSeq Stranded mRNA kits, and a modified NuGEN Ovation v2 kit; and an ultra-low-input RNA protocol, the TaKaRa SMARTer Ultra Low RNA Kit v3. Our evaluation of these kits included quality control measures such as overall reproducibility, 5’ and 3’ end-bias, and the identification of DEGs, lncRNAs, and alternatively spliced transcripts. Overall, we found that the two Illumina kits were most similar in terms of recovering DEGs, and the Illumina, modified NuGEN, and TaKaRa kits allowed identification of a similar set of DEGs. However, we also discovered that the Illumina, NuGEN and TaKaRa kits each enriched for different sets of genes.

2019-06-27 | GSE131397 | GEO

Strand-specific Illumina TruSeq mRNA sequencing libraries of 1000 Genomes Trios

Project description:Strand-specific Illumina TruSeq mRNA sequencing libraries of 1000 Genomes Trios

| PRJEB11271 | ENA

Systematic evaluation of RNA-Seq preparation protocol performance (RNASeq: TruSeq)

Project description:Systematic evaluation of RNA-Seq preparation protocol performance (RNASeq: TruSeq)

| PRJNA543482 | ENA

Library comparison between TruSeq, SMARTer and TeloPrime

Project description:Library comparison between TruSeq, SMARTer and TeloPrime

| PRJNA781209 | ENA

nascent RNAseq of hESC.

Project description:Nascent RNAseq in conjunction with Illumina TRUseq method to sequence total RNAs including short lived RNAs using highly strand-specific next-generation sequencing (NGS) libraries

2019-02-25 | E-MTAB-5115 | biostudies-arrayexpress

GaST-seq vs TruSeq

Project description:GaST-seq vs TruSeq comparison

| PRJEB31337 | ENA

Cross-site comparison of ribosomal depletion kits for Illumina RNAseq library construction.

Project description:BackgroundRibosomal RNA (rRNA) comprises at least 90% of total RNA extracted from mammalian tissue or cell line samples. Informative transcriptional profiling using massively parallel sequencing technologies requires either enrichment of mature poly-adenylated transcripts or targeted depletion of the rRNA fraction. The latter method is of particular interest because it is compatible with degraded samples such as those extracted from FFPE and also captures transcripts that are not poly-adenylated such as some non-coding RNAs. Here we provide a cross-site study that evaluates the performance of ribosomal RNA removal kits from Illumina, Takara/Clontech, Kapa Biosystems, Lexogen, New England Biolabs and Qiagen on intact and degraded RNA samples.ResultsWe find that all of the kits are capable of performing significant ribosomal depletion, though there are differences in their ease of use. All kits were able to remove ribosomal RNA to below 20% with intact RNA and identify ~ 14,000 protein coding genes from the Universal Human Reference RNA sample at >1FPKM. Analysis of differentially detected genes between kits suggests that transcript length may be a key factor in library production efficiency.ConclusionsThese results provide a roadmap for labs on the strengths of each of these methods and how best to utilize them.

| S-EPMC6389247 | biostudies-literature

Comprehensive Illumina Library Comparison

Project description:Comprehensive Illumina Library Comparison

| PRJEB31421 | ENA