E14.5-born neurons at P3 repress L4 neuron-type and induce L2/3 neuron-type genes upon Kir2.1 in utero electroporation
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA475586 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR7291050_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7291050_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7291051_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7291051_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR7291052_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 18 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Experimental in vivo hyperpolarization of E14.5 apical progenitors shifted their transcriptional programs with precocious generation of intermediate progenitors, and a forward shift in the laminar, molecular, morphological and circuit features of their neuronal progeny. In particular, we reported an overall repression of L4-type neuronal genes and a premature induction of L2/3-type neuronal genes following Kir2.1 overexpression.
2018-06-12 | GSE115627 | GEO
Project description:Localized Electroporation (LEP) has emerged as an effective tool for intracellular delivery and non-destructive analysis of cells. However, little is known about the effects of LEP on cellular gene expression which may adversely impact their downstream phenotype. Here we use single cell RNA sequencing to dissect the effects of LEP on murine neural stem cell (NSC) gene expression and compare it to Bulk Electroporation (BEP).
2023-03-10 | GSE205507 | GEO
Project description:Nr2f6 electroporation in tibialis anterior promotes muscle weakness
| PRJNA948669 | ENA
Project description:Comparison of wild-type and ctbp-1(lf) AIA neuron transcriptional profiles in L4 larval stage C. elegans
| PRJNA743925 | ENA
Project description:Abstract Background: Gene transfer by electroporation (electro gene transfer) to muscle results in high level long term transgenic expression, showing great promise for treatment of e.g. protein deficiency syndromes. However little is known about the effects of electro gene transfer on muscle fibres. We have therefore investigated transcriptional changes through gene expression profile analyses, as well as morphological changes evaluated by histological analysis. Electro gene transfer was obtained using a combination of a short high voltage pulse (HV, 1000 V/cm, 100 @s) followed by a long low voltage pulse (LV, 100 V/cm, 400 ms); a pulse combination optimised for efficient and safe gene transfer. Muscles were transfected with green fluorescent protein (GFP) and excised at 4 hours, 48 hours or 3 weeks after treatment. Results: Differentially expressed genes were investigated by microarray analysis, and descriptive statistics were performed to evaluate the effects of 1) electroporation, 2) DNA injection, and 3) time after treatment. The biological significance of the results was assessed by gene annotation and supervised cluster analysis. Generally, electroporation caused down-regulation of structural proteins e.g. sarcospan and catalytic en-zymes such as phosphoenolpuryvate carboxykinase. Injection of DNA induced down-regulation of intracellular transport proteins e.g. sentrin. The effects on muscle fibres were transient as the expression profiles 3 weeks after treatment were closely related with the control muscles. Most interestingly, no changes in the expression of proteins involved in inflammatory responses or muscle regeneration was detected, indicating limited muscle damage and regeneration. Histological analysis revealed structural changes with loss of cell integrity and striation pattern in some fibres after DNA+HV+LV treatment, while electroporation alone caused minor loss of striation pattern but preservation of cell integrity. Conclusion: The small and transient changes found in the gene expression profiles are of great importance, as this demonstrates that electro gene transfer is safe with minor effects on the muscle host cells. These findings are essential for introducing the electro gene transfer to muscle for clinical use. Indeed the HV+LV pulse combination used have been optimised to ensure highly efficient and safe electro gene transfer. Keywords: Electro gene transfer, microarray, affymetrix, gene therapy, skeletal muscle, mouse, time course
2007-07-05 | GSE6686 | GEO
Project description:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a CEA DNA immunisation approach in patients with colorectal cancer. The DNA plasmid, tetwtCEA, encodes wild type human CEA fused to a tetanus toxoid T helper epitope. The vaccine will be delivered using an intradermal electroporation device, Derma Vax (Cyto Pulse Sciences). The following will be assessed:
* The efficiency of priming immunological responses to CEA by intradermal administration of CEA DNA in combination with electroporation.
* The efficiency of boosting immunological responses to CEA by intradermal administration of CEA DNA in combination with electroporation in subjects already vaccinated with CEA DNA.
* GM-CSF will be administered to half of the subjects primed with CEA DNA in combination with electroporation and any possible adjuvant effects of GM-CSF will be evaluated.
| 2084602 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Abstract; Background: Gene transfer by electroporation (electro gene transfer) to muscle results in high level long term transgenic expression, showing great promise for treatment of e.g. protein deficiency syndromes. However little is known about the effects of electro gene transfer on muscle fibres. We have therefore investigated transcriptional changes through gene expression profile analyses, as well as morphological changes evaluated by histological analysis. Electro gene transfer was obtained using a combination of a short high voltage pulse (HV, 1000 V/cm, 100 @s) followed by a long low voltage pulse (LV, 100 V/cm, 400 ms); a pulse combination optimised for efficient and safe gene transfer. Muscles were transfected with green fluorescent protein (GFP) and excised at 4 hours, 48 hours or 3 weeks after treatment. Results: Differentially expressed genes were investigated by microarray analysis, and descriptive statistics were performed to evaluate the effects of 1) electroporation, 2) DNA injection, and 3) time after treatment. The biological significance of the results was assessed by gene annotation and supervised cluster analysis. Generally, electroporation caused down-regulation of structural proteins e.g. sarcospan and catalytic en-zymes such as phosphoenolpuryvate carboxykinase. Injection of DNA induced down-regulation of intracellular transport proteins e.g. sentrin. The effects on muscle fibres were transient as the expression profiles 3 weeks after treatment were closely related with the control muscles. Most interestingly, no changes in the expression of proteins involved in inflammatory responses or muscle regeneration was detected, indicating limited muscle damage and regeneration. Histological analysis revealed structural changes with loss of cell integrity and striation pattern in some fibres after DNA+HV+LV treatment, while electroporation alone caused minor loss of striation pattern but preservation of cell integrity. Conclusion: The small and transient changes found in the gene expression profiles are of great importance, as this demonstrates that electro gene transfer is safe with minor effects on the muscle host cells. These findings are essential for introducing the electro gene transfer to muscle for clinical use. Indeed the HV+LV pulse combination used have been optimised to ensure highly efficient and safe electro gene transfer. Experiment Overall Design: The mice did recieve to their tibialis cranialis muscle either No tretment/control (CTRL), Electroporation only (EP), Plasmid injection only (DNA) or Plasmid DNA and in vivo Electro gene transfer (EP+DNA). Experiment Overall Design: Four hrs, 48 hrs and 3 weeks after treatment the mice were euthanized and the expression profile of the treated muscles were analysed. Experiment Overall Design: The following number of mice were included: Experiment Overall Design: CTRL, 3 mice, Experiment Overall Design: EP at 4 hrs, 1 mouse, Experiment Overall Design: EP at 48 hrs, 1 mouse, Experiment Overall Design: EP at 3 weeks, 1 mouse, Experiment Overall Design: DNA at 4 hrs, 1 mouse, Experiment Overall Design: DNA at 48 hrs, 1 mouse, Experiment Overall Design: DNA at 3 weeks, 1 mouse, Experiment Overall Design: EP+DNA at 4 hrs, 2 mice, Experiment Overall Design: EP+DNA at 48 hrs, 1 mouse, Experiment Overall Design: EP+DNA at 3 weeks, 1 mouse. Experiment Overall Design: A total number of mice 13.
2009-04-23 | E-GEOD-6686 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:RNA sequencing data of Wild Type and Fmr1 KO hippocampal neuron
| PRJNA454880 | ENA
Project description:Mitral cells in the mouse olfactory bulb are known to remodel their primary dendrites and form lateral dendrites during postnatal development. These processes are suppressed when neuronal activity is silenced by overexpression of Kir2.1 in mitral cells, indicating that neuronal activity in mitral cells is required. However, it is unclear what changes in gene expression lead to the remodeling of mitral cell dendrites in an activity-dependent manner. To address this, we performed a microarray-based analysis of gene expression in mitral cells during normal development and under the activity-silenced condition.
2021-04-13 | GSE171875 | GEO
Project description:The trial is designed as an investigator initiated prospective phase 2 study in patients with metastatic pMMR colorectal cancer (CRC) to determine the safety and efficacy of calcium electroporation (CaEP) performed concurrently with irreversible electroporation (IRE) followed by a PD-1 inhibitor (pembrolizumab).
| 2760805 | ecrin-mdr-crc