The proteasome inhibitor MG132 adjusts the transcriptome in Brassica napus roots
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA525819 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:The goal of this study was to determine how proteasome inhibition alters the transcriptome in Brassica napus roots. Specifically, we wished to see if proteasome inhibition resulted in transcriptome signatures of oxidative stress, protein catabolism, or nitrogen assimilation
2021-12-03 | GSE127923 | GEO
Project description:The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of proteasome inhibition on glucocorticoid and estrogen receptor regulated gene expression. Experiment Overall Design: MCF-7 cells were treated with proteasome inhibitor (MG132), dexamethasone, 17b-estradiol or MG132 plus dexamethasone or MG132 plus 7b-estardiol. Control cells were not treated. RNA was collected from 2 biological experiments.
2008-06-20 | E-GEOD-8383 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We report whole genome chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) of 3 different RNA Pol II CTD modifications in MCF-7 breast cancer cells treated with vehicle (UNTR) or the proteasome inhibitor MG132 for 4 (MG4H) or 24 (MG24H) hours. We find the non-phosphorylated form of RNA Pol II CTD accumulates at TSS of all expressed genes in proteasome inhibited cells, particularly after 24H of MG132 treatment. Proteasome inhibition enhances Ser5-P and Ser2-P binding at TSS of genes induced by MG132. We note that proteasome inhibition establishes unique Ser2-P 5’ to 3’ gene profiles at induced compared to repressed genes. Overall proteasome inhibition enhances RNA Pol II processivity and expression of gene networks relevant to breast cancer. The study provides a comprehensive resource of RNA Pol II binding in proteasome inhibited cells.
2020-01-07 | GSE142010 | GEO
Project description:We report whole genome chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) of histone modifications in MCF-7 breast cancer cells treated with vehicle (UNTR) or the proteasome inhibitor MG132 for 4 (MG4H) or 24 (MG24H) hours. We find that MG132 treatment results in the spreading of the H3-trimethyl lysine 4 mark into gene bodies of a subset of induced genes in MCF-7 cells. The spreading of the H3K4me3 is concomitant with hyperacetylation (H3K27ac, K122ac and K9/14ac) of the corresponding gene TSS. H3 Lysine 36 trimethylation mark is enriched at genes that are induced by MG132. Finally, we show that proteasome inhibition establishes a chromatin state that enhances antiproliferative, while dampening cell proliferative gene expression programs relevant to breast cancer. The study provides a comprehensive resource of histone modifications in proteasome inhibited cells.
2020-01-07 | GSE142009 | GEO
Project description:Background: The combination of Proteasome inhibitor with Glucocorticoid is one of the most promising antileukemic treatments. Both agents act through pluripotent signal mediators. The two types of agents inhibit key signals that are considered crucial to their effects on malignant cells. Methodology/Principal Findings: Combined use of the two reagents on the lymphoblastic leukemia cell line CCRF-CEM has a range of effects on the viability that depend on the dose and the time used. Even though both reagents are capable of enhancing cell death on the CEM cell line, no combinatorial increase in cell death is detectable, until after the first 120 hours of treatment. In contrast, there are a number of combinatorial effects on the cell cycle phase distribution of treated cells, which indicates a potential for mutual signal disruption between glucocorticoid and proteasome inhibitor at multiple levels. Microarray analysis indicates that Prednisolone and MG132 elicit highly divergent, early-response molecular signatures on this cell line. We assayed levels of the antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 as a potential model of late, downstream target regulation by both glucocorticoid and proteasome. Synchronized use of Prednisolone with MG132 results in temporary stabilization of Mcl-1 in CEM cells. Stabilization is not the result of a common mechanism of action on the genome, as Prednisolone and MG132 elicit nonreduntant molecular signatures, and it occurs also when the cells are treated at different timepoints with either agent. Conclusions/Significance: Our results show that this glucocorticoid-resistant ALL lymphoblast line is highly sensitive to proteasome inhibitor, and suggest that the proteasome inhibitor and the glucocorticoid regulate different direct target genes. This difference in immediate targets, when the two agents are applied in combination, may lead to negative or positive interference with mechanisms regulating viability of the leukemic lymphoblast. Signal interference between glucocorticoid Prednisolone and the proteasome inhibitor MG132 is expected to occur at more than one level, resulting in complex effects on intracellular signal transduction pathways. The net result depends on the development of individual downstream effects and interactions between key signal mediators. Elucidation of the conditions of interference between glucocorticoid and proteasome targets on leukemic cell fate is expected to improve effects of applied treatment combinations. Experimental setups consisted of the three following samples obtained after 4 h treatment: control, 10nM prednisolone, 1uM prednisolone, 10uM prednisolone, 100M-NM-<M prednisolone, 700M-NM-<M prednisolone, 200nM MG132, 2M-NM-<M MG132 and 20M-NM-<M MG132. Untreated cells were used as reference.
2011-05-11 | E-GEOD-29136 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Chromatin state of MCF-7 breast cancer cells treated with proteasome inhibitor MG132 [histone_mod_chip_seq]
| PRJNA595567 | ENA
Project description:The ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy are two major intracellular proteolytic pathways and both remove misfolded and proteotoxic proteins from eukaryotic cells. This study describes the detailed informations about the change in composition and interactome of proteasomes after prolonged MG132 treatment.
2021-09-09 | PXD019193 | Pride
Project description:Transcriptional regulation in MCF-7 breast cancer cells treated with proteasome inhibitor MG132 [rna_polii_chIP-seq]
| PRJNA595566 | ENA
Project description:Heat shock response (HSR) is a cellular defense mechanism against various stresses. Both heat shock and proteasome inhibitor MG132 cause the induction of heat shock proteins, a distinct feature of HSR. To better understand the molecular basis of HSR, we subjected the mouse fibrosarcoma cell line, RIF-1, and its thermotolerant variant, TR-RIF-1 cells, to heat shock and MG132. We compared mRNA expressions using microarray analysis during recovery after heat shock and MG132 treatment. This study led us to group the 3,245 up-regulated genes by heat shock and MG132 into three families: genes regulated 1) by both heat shock and MG132 (e.g. chaperones); 2) by heat shock (e.g. DNA-binding proteins including histones); and 3) by MG132 (e.g. innate immunity and defense-related molecules). RIF-1 and TR cells were heat shock treated or MG132 treated and harvested after various times of recovery. mRNA expressions were compared to untreated samples. Biological replication was done.
2011-11-09 | E-GEOD-24197 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Background: The combination of Proteasome inhibitor with Glucocorticoid is one of the most promising antileukemic treatments. Both agents act through pluripotent signal mediators. The two types of agents inhibit key signals that are considered crucial to their effects on malignant cells. Methodology/Principal Findings: Combined use of the two reagents on the lymphoblastic leukemia cell line CCRF-CEM has a range of effects on the viability that depend on the dose and the time used. Even though both reagents are capable of enhancing cell death on the CEM cell line, no combinatorial increase in cell death is detectable, until after the first 120 hours of treatment. In contrast, there are a number of combinatorial effects on the cell cycle phase distribution of treated cells, which indicates a potential for mutual signal disruption between glucocorticoid and proteasome inhibitor at multiple levels. Microarray analysis indicates that Prednisolone and MG132 elicit highly divergent, early-response molecular signatures on this cell line. We assayed levels of the antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 as a potential model of late, downstream target regulation by both glucocorticoid and proteasome. Synchronized use of Prednisolone with MG132 results in temporary stabilization of Mcl-1 in CEM cells. Stabilization is not the result of a common mechanism of action on the genome, as Prednisolone and MG132 elicit nonreduntant molecular signatures, and it occurs also when the cells are treated at different timepoints with either agent. Conclusions/Significance: Our results show that this glucocorticoid-resistant ALL lymphoblast line is highly sensitive to proteasome inhibitor, and suggest that the proteasome inhibitor and the glucocorticoid regulate different direct target genes. This difference in immediate targets, when the two agents are applied in combination, may lead to negative or positive interference with mechanisms regulating viability of the leukemic lymphoblast. Signal interference between glucocorticoid Prednisolone and the proteasome inhibitor MG132 is expected to occur at more than one level, resulting in complex effects on intracellular signal transduction pathways. The net result depends on the development of individual downstream effects and interactions between key signal mediators. Elucidation of the conditions of interference between glucocorticoid and proteasome targets on leukemic cell fate is expected to improve effects of applied treatment combinations.
2011-05-11 | GSE29136 | GEO