Project description:Gene expression profile changes between ATO- treated and DMSO- treated Huh7 and Hep3B cells were analyzed To further explore the mechanism of ATO-induced differentiation, we performed a gene microarray assay to compare the differential gene expression profiles of low-dose ATO-treated (3 μM ATO treatment for 7 days) and negative control cells.
Project description:To globally evaluate to what extend type-1 p53 mutant transcription activity can be restored by arsenic trioxide (ATO) (compared to wild-type p53), p53-null U937 cells introduced with 10 frequent type-1 p53, type-3 p53-R273H (negative control), empty vector or wild-type p53 were treated with or without 1 μg/mL ATO. mRNA was isolated and then subject to deep sequencing, using Illumina HiSeq. The sequence reads that passed quality filters were analyzed using Cutadapt. Results and conclusions: The type-1 p53 mutants are the major cellular targets of ATO in the current cell contexts. The expression profiles of well-established p53 targets in cells expressing wild-type p53 highly correlated with the ones in cells expressing ATO-rescued type-1 mutants, but not those in cells expressing ATO-treated R273H. In cells harboring type-1 mutants, the median expression levels of these targets were elevated by ATO to extents comparable to wild-type p53.
Project description:We found PML was responsible for ATO resistance in HCC cells, PML knockdown cells show better sensitivity to ATO treatment. To further explore the mechanism of PML-induced ATO resistance, we performed a microarray assay to compare the differential gene expression profiles of PML-siRNA-treated (PML knockdown) and negative control siRNA-treated cells.
Project description:BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high mortality rate due to the lack of effective treatments and drugs. Arsenic trioxide (As2O3, ATO, arsenious acid), which has been proved to successfully treat acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), was recently reported to show therapeutic potential in solid tumors including liver cancer. Although the mechanistic effects of ATO in APL are established, its anticancer mechanism of action in HCC is still unclear. METHODS: We established an HCC subcutaneous xenograft and intrahepatic metastasis mouse model. In CSC models, tumorspheres and the flow cytometry analysis of CSC markers together with limiting dilution and serial transplantation were used. We compared mRNA expression profiles of the ATO-treated and control cells with mRNA microarray. The expression of target molecule or a clinical correlation was analyzed by immunohistochemistry staining in tissues from ATO-treated mouse and 76 HCC patients. We generated five stable minichromosome maintenance protein 7 (MCM7)-knockdown and two stable MCM7-overexpression HCC cell lines. The chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays, immunoprecipitation (IP) assays, the dual luciferase reporter assays, a green biarsenical labeling reagent (FlAsH-EDT2) and a “competing endogenous RNA” (ceRNA) analysis were used. RESULTS: ATO could inhibit the liver tumor-initiating capacity and distant metastasis and prolongs survival in mice. We then screened and found that ATO downregulates the overexpression of MCM7 which is correlated with the progression and prognosis in HCC patients. Knockdown of MCM7 expression recapitulates the inhibition function of ATO on self-renewal of cancer stem cells (CSCs), while overexpression of MCM7 abolishes the inhibition function of ATO on tumorsphere formation. Most importantly, we revealed that ATO directly binds to the MCM7 protein and disturbs the interaction between serum response factor (SRF) and MCM7, resulting in downregulation of MCM7 transcription. A ceRNA analysis also indicated the alterations of endogenous MCM7-associated gene networks involved in stemness-related signaling pathways and cell differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: Here, for the first time, we report that ATO inhibits liver CSCs through blocking the interaction between SRF/MCM7 and suppressing MCM7 autoregulation activity.
Project description:To investigate the effect of Ato-C on gene expression, we have employed whole genome microarray expression profiling as a discovery platform to identify genes with the potential to suppress the cell proliferation of Ph+ CML cell lines. K562, KU-812 and MEG-A2 cells were treated with ATO, CDDP or Ato-C for 24 h in vitro.
Project description:We found PML was responsible for ATO resistance in HCC cells, PML knockdown cells show better sensitivity to ATO treatment. To further explore the mechanism of PML-induced ATO resistance, we performed a microarray assay to compare the differential gene expression profiles of PML-siRNA-treated (PML knockdown) and negative control siRNA-treated cells. Two-condition experiment, PML-siRNA vs. control cells. Biological replicates: two cell lines and each cell line has 1 control, 1 transfected, independently grown and harvested. One replicate per array. Comparisons were made between PML siRNA group and control group for each cell line
Project description:Transcriptional profiling of human leukemia?HL-60 cells comparing ATRA treated HL-60 cells with ATRA plus ATO. Goal was to determine the effects of ATO on ATRA induced differentiation of HL-60 cells. Two-condition experiment, ATRA vs. ATRA plus ATO treated HL-60 cells.
Project description:To globally evaluate to what extend the p53 mutant transcription activity can be restored by arsenic trioxide (ATO), p53-null U937 cells introduced with p53-R280I or wild-type p53 were treated with or without 1 μg/mL ATO. mRNA was isolated and then subject to deep sequencing, using Illumina HiSeq. The sequence reads that passed quality filters were analyzed using Cutadapt.
Project description:Arsenic trioxide (ATO) treatment leads to activation of mRNA translation through the MAPK-interacting kinase (MNK) signaling pathway. Polysomal fractionation and microarray analysis allows for identification of transcripts undergoing active translation. We identified the genes differentially enriched in untreated and ATO treated fractions. In this dataset, we include expression data in untreated and ATO treated LN229 cells using either the total or polysomal RNA.