Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

ABSTRACT: Eleocharis genomes - low coverage

PROVIDER: PRJNA549305 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR9313477.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR9313478.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 2 of 2

Similar Datasets

Project description:Eleocharis (Cyperaceae) genomes

| PRJNA413521 | ENA

Arabidopsis MAGIC

Project description:Low-Coverage sequence of Arabidopsis MAGIC Genomes

| PRJEB19252 | ENA

Project description:Eleocharis (Cyperaceae) genomes 2

| PRJNA413525 | ENA

Project description:Low coverage whole genome sequencing of 5 Anemone genomes

| PRJNA830872 | ENA

Project description:Low Coverage Genomes from 17th Century Delaware, United States

| PRJNA812783 | ENA

1000 Genomes Full Production low coverage WGS population sequencing

Project description:1000 Genomes Full Production low coverage WGS population sequencing

| PRJNA59771 | ENA

Homo sapiens

Project description:Low Coverage Genomes of Ancient Indiviudals from British Columbia

| PRJNA382375 | ENA

protist metagenome

Project description:Marine protist metagenomes from low coverage single amplified genomes

| PRJNA655200 | ENA

Evaluation of copy number variation detection between high-resolution array CGH and low-coverage short-insert and mate-pair whole-genome sequencing

Project description:In principle, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of the human genome even at low coverage offers higher resolution for genomic copy number variation (CNV) detection compared to array-based technologies, which is currently the first-tier approach in clinical cytogenetics. There are, however, obstacles in replacing array-based CNV detection with that of low-coverage WGS such as cost, turnaround time, and lack of systematic performance comparisons. With technological advances in WGS in terms of library preparation, instrument platforms, and data analysis algorithms, obstacles imposed by cost and turnaround time are fading. However, a systematic performance comparison between array and low-coverage WGS-based CNV detection has yet to be performed. Here, we compared the CNV detection capabilities between WGS (short-insert, 3kb-, and 5kb-mate-pair libraries) at 1X, 3X, and 5X coverages and standardly used high-resolution arrays in the genome of 1000-Genomes-Project CEU genome NA12878. CNV detection was performed using standard analysis methods, and the results were then compared to a list of Gold Standard NA12878 CNVs distilled from the 1000-Genomes Project. Overall, low-coverage WGS is able to detect drastically more (approximately 5 fold more on average) Gold Standard CNVs compared to arrays and is accompanied with fewer CNV calls without secondary validation. Furthermore, we also show that WGS (at ≥1X coverage) is able to detect all seven validated deletions larger than 100 kb in the NA12878 genome whereas only one of such deletions is detected in most arrays. Finally, we show that the much larger 15 Mbp Cri-du-chat deletion can be clearly seen at even 1X coverage from short-insert WGS.

2018-06-26 | GSE105092 | GEO

Project description:Low-coverage WGS

| PRJNA826350 | ENA