Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Next-generation sequencing analysis to compare expression pattern of relapse and baseline "CMP pattern" MDS samples

ABSTRACT: Next-generation sequencing analysis to compare expression pattern of relapse and baseline "CMP pattern" MDS samples

PROVIDER: PRJNA563724 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Next-generation sequencing analysis to compare expression pattern of relapse and baseline "CMP pattern" MDS samples

Project description:Transcriptional changes occurring in the expanding LT-HSC population of "CMP pattern" MDS patients with blast expansion post-HMA failure were compared with the transcriptional profile of untreated (baseline) "CMP pattern" MDS patients.

2022-01-03 | GSE136815 | GEO

Next-generation sequencing analysis to compare expression pattern of relapse and baseline "GMP pattern" MDS samples

Project description:Transcriptional changes occurring in the expanding LMPP population of "GMP pattern" MDS patients with blast expansion post-HMA failure were compared with the transcriptional profile of untreated (baseline) "GMP pattern" MDS patients.

2022-01-03 | GSE136812 | GEO

Next-generation sequencing analysis to compare expression pattern of relapse and baseline "GMP pattern" MDS samples

Project description:Next-generation sequencing analysis to compare expression pattern of relapse and baseline "GMP pattern" MDS samples

| PRJNA563710 | ENA

Next-generation sequencing analysis to compare expression pattern of relapse and baseline MDS samples

Project description:Next-generation sequencing analysis to compare expression pattern of relapse and baseline MDS samples

| PRJNA563722 | ENA

Next Generation Sequencing analysis to compare expression patterns of myeloid progenitors in healthy donors and MDS patients

Project description:Transcriptional changes occurring in the CMPs and GMPs of untreated "CMP pattern" and "GMP pattern" MDS patients were compared with the transcriptional profile of CMPs and GMPs from healthy donors

2022-01-02 | GSE178840 | GEO

Next-generation sequencing analysis to compare expression pattern of relapse and baseline MDS samples

Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.

2022-01-02 | GSE136816 | GEO

Expression data from G0 versus G4/G5 CMP/GMP

Project description:Telomere dysfunctional CMP/GMP have deregulated pathways that are associated with DNA damage signaling We compared differentially expressed genes in the G4/G5 CMP relative to the G0 control to identify pathways that may affect CMP differentiation.

2015-04-09 | GSE62278 | GEO

Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing from G0 & G4/G5 CMP

2015-04-09 | GSE62392 | GEO

Penicillium expansum strain:CMP-1

Project description:Penicillium expansum CMP-1 Genome sequencing

| PRJNA255744 | ENA

Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing from G0 & G4/G5 CMP

Project description:Differential hyper- and hypo-methylation regions in G0 versus G4/G5 CMP The goal of this study is to evaluate changes in CpG methylation profilings of telomere dysfunctional common myeloid progenitor cells (CMP) as compared to their wild type controls Genomic DNA was extracted from sorted CMP populations isolated from 3 pools of G0 or 2 pools of G5 mice using UltraPure Phenol:Chloroform:Isoamyl Alcohol according to manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies). 14,000 to 30,000 cells were available for each sample, resulting in a minimum of 45ng of DNA. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling was performed by RRBS. Library preparation and sequencing were performed at the UT MD Anderson Cancer Center’s DNA Methylation Analysis Core and Sequencing and Microarray Facility, according to published protocols. RRBS sequencing data were aligned and methylation was called using Bismark v0.7.119. In brief, bisulphite-treated DNA was aligned to UCSC Genome Browser mm10 reference genome using Bowtie. In total 29-38 million reads were generated per sample with alignment rates around 63%. Next, MethylKit10 implemented with Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the cytosine methylation profiles of G0 and G5 CMP. Gene promoter regions were calculated based on RefSeq gene annotations with regions starting 1 kb upstream of the annotated transcription start site (TSS) and extending 500 base pairs downstream of TSS. Exons, introns, and CpG islands coordinates were collected from the UCSC Genome Browser mm10 version.

2015-04-09 | E-GEOD-62392 | biostudies-arrayexpress

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data