Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA574767 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR10198996_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR10198996_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR10198997_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR10198997_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR10198998_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 8 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:454 dataset for Hosia, et al. Torstensson et al. Dinasquet et al.
| PRJEB7907 | ENA
Project description:Small endogenous C. elegans RNAs from L4 and young adult worms were prepared for sequencing using a protocol derived from Batista et al., (2008) and Lau et al. (2001). The small-RNA libraries were constructed using a method that does not require a 5’ monophosphate (called 5’ monophosphate-independent method, Ambros et al., 2003) to profile secondary siRNAs that have 5’ triphosphorylated G. All preprocessed small-RNA reads were mapped to genome (ce6), allowing no mismatches. After excluding miRNAs, 21U RNAs, rRNAs, and other structural ncRNAs, the remaining reads were classified as 22G RNAs, 26G RNAs, and other siRNAs, based on their length and 5′ terminal nucleotide.
2012-06-13 | GSE36394 | GEO
Project description:Purpose: The aim of this study is to identify the GR genome binding profile as well as that of Pol II, H3K27ac, H3K4me1, H3K4me3 and Ctcf in skeletal muscles. Methods: Libraries were prepared from immunoprecipitated DNA according to standard methods. ChIP-seq libraries were sequenced using a HiSeq 4000 (Illumina) and mapped to the mm10 reference genome using bowtie 2 (Langmead et al., 2009). Data were further analysed using the peak finding algorithm MACS 2 (Zhang et al., 2008) using input as control. All peaks with FDR greater than 0.1 % were excluded from further analysis. The uniquely mapped reads were used to generate the genome-wide intensity profiles, which were visualized using the IGV genome browser (Thorvaldsdottir et al., 2012). Results: HOMER (Heinz et al., 2010) was used to annotate peaks, to calculate overlaps between different peak files, and for motif searches. The genomic features (promoter, exon, intron, 3’ UTR, and intergenic regions) were defined and calculated using Refseq and HOMER. Genes annotated by HOMER were further used for a pathway analysis in WebGestalt (Heinz et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2013).
2020-10-01 | GSE142518 | GEO
Project description:Purpose: The aim of this study is to identify the GR genome binding profile as well as that of Pol II, H3K27ac, H3K4me1, H3K4me3 and Ctcf in skeletal muscles. Methods: Libraries were prepared from immunoprecipitated DNA according to standard methods. ChIP-seq libraries were sequenced using a HiSeq 4000 (Illumina) and mapped to the mm10 reference genome using bowtie 2 (Langmead et al., 2009). Data were further analysed using the peak finding algorithm MACS 2 (Zhang et al., 2008) using input as control. All peaks with FDR greater than 0.1 % were excluded from further analysis. The uniquely mapped reads were used to generate the genome-wide intensity profiles, which were visualized using the IGV genome browser (Thorvaldsdottir et al., 2012). Results: HOMER (Heinz et al., 2010) was used to annotate peaks, to calculate overlaps between different peak files, and for motif searches. The genomic features (promoter, exon, intron, 3’ UTR, and intergenic regions) were defined and calculated using Refseq and HOMER. Genes annotated by HOMER were further used for a pathway analysis in WebGestalt (Heinz et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2013).
2021-04-10 | GSE164543 | GEO
Project description:The aim of this study was to use NGS RNAseq deep-sequencing in order to characterize the polyadenylated mRNAs and lncRNAs expressed in LNCaP cells treated with androgen hormone compared with untreated LNCaP cells (GSE79301). Trimmed reads were mapped using the hg19 genome with TopHat v.2.0.12 and Bowtie v.2.2.3. The assembly was guided by a custom GTF file created with transcripts fromhuman lncRNA annotations from GENCODE v19 (Harrow, Frankish et al.2012) and those already annotated as lincRNAs in (Cabili, Trapnell et al. 2011; Prensner, Iyer et al. 2011; Hangauer, Vaughn et al. 2013). The diferencial expression was calculated by the sum of exon read count per gene with HTSeq (Anders, Pyl et al. 2015), followed by a DESeq2 analysis (Love, Huber et al. 2014).
2017-12-31 | GSE102305 | GEO