Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

ABSTRACT: Benchmarking Metagenomics Tools for Taxonomic Classification

PROVIDER: PRJNA574968 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR10203103_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR10203103_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR10203104_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR10203104_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR10203105_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 10

Similar Datasets

From defaults to databases: parameter and database choice dramatically impact the performance of metagenomic taxonomic classification tools

Project description:Comparison of different tools for metagenome taxonomic classification

| PRJEB55832 | ENA

Automated identification of the Cowpox virus (Brighton Red) strain in HEp-2 cells using nLC-MS/MS spectra

Project description:Accompanying benchmarking sample for "TaxIt: An iterative computational pipeline for untargeted strain-level identification using MS/MS spectra from pathogenic single-organism samples": Untargeted accurate strain-level classification of a priori unidentified organisms using tandem mass spectrometry is a challenging task. Reference databases often lack taxonomic depth, limiting peptide assignments to the species level. However, the extension with detailed strain information increases runtime and decreases statistical power. In addition, larger databases contain a higher number of similar proteomes. We present TaxIt, an iterative workflow to address the increasing search space required for MS/MS-based strain-level classification of samples with unknown taxonomic origin. TaxIt first applies reference sequence data for initial identification of species candidates, followed by automated acquisition of relevant strain sequences for low level classification. Furthermore, proteome similarities resulting in ambiguous taxonomic assignments are addressed with an abundance weighting strategy to increase the confidence in candidate taxa. For benchmarking the performance of our method, we apply our iterative workflow on several samples of bacterial and viral origin. In comparison to non-iterative approaches using unique peptides or advanced abundance correction, TaxIt identifies microbial strains correctly in all examples presented (with one tie), thereby demonstrating the potential for untargeted and deeper taxonomic classification. TaxIt makes extensive use of public, unrestricted and continuously growing sequence resources such as the NCBI databases and is available under open-source BSD license at https://gitlab.com/rki_bioinformatics/TaxIt.

2020-05-11 | PXD014913 | Pride

Project description:Benchmarking controls for metagenomic classification

| PRJNA1118346 | ENA

RiboReport - Benchmarking ribosome profiling based identification of open reading frames in bacteria.

Project description:Generation of a Ribo-seq dataset for E. coli MG1655 for benchmarking Ribo-seq analysis tools

2022-05-20 | GSE131514 | GEO

Metagenomics pipelines visualisation

Project description:Benchmarking of metagenomics pipelines

| PRJEB39393 | ENA

Sequenced based Metagenomics approach

Project description:Metagenomics approach for taxonomic classification and identification of biosynthetic gene-clusters from soil microbiome.

| PRJEB58067 | ENA

NanoString nCounter Cancer CN panel assay CNV detection of high-grade serous carcinoma samples

Project description:CNVs detection using 13 samples’ pairs of (12 samples’ pairs of histologically confirmed diagnosis of high-grade serous carcinoma and one patient with endometrioid carcinoma and matching normal tissues. Samples have IHC status for p53, WT1, Ki-67, PAX-8, and TNM classification according to WHO Classification of Tumors. Please cite the original atricle: Grebnev, P.A.; Meshkov, I.O.; Ershov, P.V.; Makhotenko, A.V.; Azarian, V.B.; Erokhina, M.V.; Galeta, A.A.; Zakubanskiy, A.V.; Shingalieva, O.S.; Tregubova, A.V.; et al. Benchmarking of Approaches for Gene Copy-Number Variation Analysis and Its Utility for Genetic Aberration Detection in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinomas. Cancers 2024, 16, 3252. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16193252

2024-09-24 | GSE244329 | GEO

Critical Assessment of Metaproteome Investigation (CAMPI): a Multi-Lab Comparison of Established Workflows

Project description:Metaproteomics, the study of the collective proteome within a microbial ecosystem, has substantially grown over the past few years. This growth comes from the increased awareness that it can powerfully supplement metagenomics and metatranscriptomics analyses. Although metaproteomics is more challenging than single-species proteomics, its added value has already been demonstrated in various biosystems, such as gut microbiomes or biogas plants. Because of the many challenges, a variety of metaproteomics workflows have been developed, yet it remains unclear what the impact of the choice of workflow is on the obtained results. Therefore, we set out to compare several well-established workflows in the first community-driven, multi-lab comparison in metaproteomics: the critical assessment of metaproteome investigation (CAMPI) study. In this benchmarking study, we evaluated the influence of different workflows on sample preparation, mass spectrometry acquisition, and bioinformatic analysis on two samples: a simplified, lab-assembled human intestinal sample and a complex human fecal sample. We find that the same overall biological meaning can be inferred from the metaproteome data, regardless of the chosen workflow. Indeed, taxonomic and functional annotations were very similar across all sample-specific data sets. Moreover, this outcome was consistent regardless of whether protein groups or peptides, or differences at the spectrum or peptide level were used to infer these annotations. Where differences were observed, those originated primarily from different wet-lab methods rather than from different bioinformatic pipelines. The CAMPI study thus provides a solid foundation for benchmarking metaproteomics workflows, and will therefore be a key reference for future method improvement.

2022-02-16 | PXD023217 | Pride

Systematic comparison of tools used for m6A mapping from nanopore direct RNA sequencing

Project description:State-of-the-art algorithms for m6A detection and quantification via nanopore direct RNA sequencing have been continuously developed, little is known about their capacities and limitations, which makes a comprehensive assessment in urgent need. Therefore, we performed comprehensive benchmarking of 10 computational tools relying on current-based and base-calling “errors” strategies for m6A detection by nanopore sequencing.

2023-03-01 | GSE195618 | GEO

Project description:Benchmarking sequencing methods and tools that facilitate the study of alternative polyadenylation

| PRJNA762669 | ENA