Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Anaerobic digester metagenome

ABSTRACT: Microbial diversity in anaerobic sludge.

PROVIDER: PRJNA596095 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR10762459.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR10761775.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 2 of 2

Similar Datasets

anaerobic digester metagenome

Project description:Microbial diversity on anaerobic digester

| PRJNA279138 | ENA

anaerobic digester metagenome

Project description:Anaerobic digestion sludge Metagenome

| PRJNA703818 | ENA

anaerobic digester metagenome

Project description:anaerobic wastewater digester sludge

| PRJNA315143 | ENA

anaerobic digester metagenome

Project description:Anaerobic digestion of UOW with sludge

| PRJNA328964 | ENA

Multi-level microbial fingerprinting in anaerobic digestion reveals consistent fingerprinting profiles

Project description:The anaerobic digestion microbiomes has been puzzling us since the dawn of molecular methods for mixed microbial community analysis. Monitoring of the anaerobic digestion microbiome can either take place via a holistic evaluation of the microbial community through fingerprinting or by targeted monitoring of selected taxa. Here, we compared four different microbial community fingerprinting methods, i.e., amplicon sequencing, metaproteomics, metabolomics and phenotypics, in their ability to reflect the full-scale anaerobic digestion microbiome. The phenotypic fingerprinting reflects a, for anaerobic digestion, novel, single cell-based approach of direct microbial community fingerprinting. Three different digester types, i.e., sludge digesters, digesters treating agro-industrial waste and dry anaerobic digesters reflected different operational parameters. The α-diversity analysis yielded inconsistent results, especially for richness, across the different methods. In contrast, β-diversity analysis resulted in comparable profiles, even when translated into phyla or functions, with clear separation of the three digester types. In-depth analysis of each method's features i.e., operational taxonomic units, metaproteins, metabolites, and phenotypic traits, yielded certain similar features yet, also some clear differences between the different methods, which was related to the complexity of the anaerobic digestion process. In conclusion, phenotypic fingerprinting is a reliable, fast method for holistic monitoring of the anaerobic digestion microbiome, and the complementary identification of key features through other methods could give rise to a direct interpretation of anaerobic digestion process performance.

2021-05-26 | PXD024788 | Pride

anaerobic digester metagenome

Project description:Uncovering viable microbiome in anaerobic sludge digesters

| PRJDB8117 | ENA

anaerobic digester metagenome

Project description:16S rRNA gene squencing of anaerobic digested sludge

| PRJDB8474 | ENA

anaerobic digester metagenome

Project description:Anaerobic Sludge From Malaysian Palm Oil Mill Effluent

| PRJNA951863 | ENA

anaerobic digester metagenome

Project description:Anaerobic digestion for simultaneous sewage sludge treatment and syngas biomethanation: process performance and microbial ecology

| PRJDB2219 | ENA

anaerobic digester metagenome

Project description:Sludge from full-scale anaerobic digesters Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA295894 | ENA