Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA681489 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR13172615_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR13172615_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR13172616_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR13172616_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR13172617_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 60 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Early-weaning-induced stress causes diarrhea, thereby reduces growth performance of piglets. Gut bacterial dysbiosis emerges as a leading cause of post-weaning diarrhea. The present study was aimed to investigate the effect of capsulized fecal microbiota transportation (FMT) on gut bacterial community, immune response and gut barrier function of weaned piglets. Thirty-two were randomly divided into two groups fed with basal diet for 21 days. Recipient group was inoculated orally with capsulized fecal microbiota of health Tibetan pig daily morning during whole period of trial, while control group was given orally empty capsule. The results showed that the F/G ratio, diarrhea ratio, diarrhea index, and histological damage score of recipient piglets were significantly decreased. FMT treatment also significantly increased the colon length of piglets. Furthermore, the relative abundances of Firmicutes, Euryarchaeota, Tenericutes, Lactobacillus, Methanobrevibacter and Sarcina in colon of recipient piglets were increased, and the relative abundances of Campylobacter, Proteobacteria, and Melainabacteria were significantly decreased compared with control group.
2019-09-17 | GSE137470 | GEO
Project description:Effects of current therapeutic foods in undernourished Bangladeshi children compared to microbiota-directed food prototypes in gnotobiotic mice and piglets
2018-04-18 | MSV000082286 | MassIVE
Project description:The preferential localization of some neoplasms, such as serrated polyps, in specific areas of the intestine suggests that non-genetic factors may be important for their development. To test this hypothesis, we took advantage of transgenic mice that expressed HB-EGF throughout the intestine, but develop serrated polyps only in the cecum. Here we show that a host-specific microbiome was associated with serrated polyps, and that alterations of the microbiota induced by antibiotic treatment or by embryo-transfer rederivation markedly inhibited the formation of serrated polyps in the cecum. Mechanistically, development of serrated polyps was associated with a local decrease in epithelial barrier-function, bacterial invasion, production of antimicrobials, and increased expression of several inflammatory factors such as IL-17, Cxcl2, Tnf-α, and IL-1. Increased number of neutrophils were found within the serrated polyps, and their depletion significantly reduced polyp growth. Together these results indicate that non-genetic factors contribute to the development of serrated polyps and suggest that the development of these intestinal neoplasms in the cecum is driven by the interplay between genetic changes in the host, an inflammatory response, and a host-specific microbiota. SUMMARY: Serrated polyps (SP) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms found in particular areas of the gut. To define the factors contributing to their specific localization, we analyzed a strain of transgenic mice that carry a genetic alteration throughout the intestinal epithelium, but only develop SP in the cecum. Transcriptome and immunostaining analyses showed increased expression of antimicrobial genes, inflammatory factors, and the presence of bacteria within SP. Alteration of the cecal microbiota by antibiotic treatment or by embryo-transfer rederivation dramatically reduced SP incidence. Microbiome analysis implicated a limited set of bacteria in the development of SP. Together, these results point to a crucial role for the microbiota in the localized development of SP in a genetically susceptible host. We obtained serrated polyp (SP) and surrounding normal (NM) tissue from the ceca of three affected mice (paired design) and assessed expression differences by RNA-Seq.
2014-02-12 | E-GEOD-47735 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Emerging knowledge shows the importance of early life events in programming the intestinal mucosal immune system and development of the intestinal barrier function. These processes depend heavily on close interactions between gut microbiota and host cells in the intestinal mucosa. In turn, development of the intestinal microbiota is largely dependent on available nutrients and substrates required for the specific microbial community structures to expand. It is currently not known what the specificities are of intestinal microbial community structures in relation to the programming of the intestinal mucosal immune system and development of the intestinal barrier function. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of a nutritional intervention on intestinal development of suckling piglets by daily oral administration of fructooligosaccharides (FOS) over a period of 12 days. At the microbiota community level a clear “bifidogenic” effect of the FOS administration was observed in colon digesta at day 14. The former, however, did not translate into significant changes of local gene expression in the colonic mucosa. In the jejunum, significant changes were observed for microbiota composition at day 14, and microbiota diversity at day 25. In addition, significant differentially expressed gene sets in mucosal tissues of jejunum were identified at both days 14 and 25 of age. At the age of 14 days, lower activity of cell cycle-related processes and a higher activity of extracellular matrix processes were observed in jejunal scrapings of piglets supplemented with FOS compared to control piglets. At day 25, lower activity of immune-related processes in jejunal tissue were seen in piglets supplemented with FOS. Histological parameters, villi height and crypt depth, were significantly different at day 25 between the experimental and control group, where piglets supplemented with FOS had higher villi and deeper crypts. We conclude that oral FOS administration during the suckling period of piglets has significant bifidogenic effects on the microbiota in the colon and on gene expression in jejunal mucosa scrapings. We hypothesize that FOS supplementation of suckling piglets results in a higher butyrate production in the colon due to the increase in bifidobacteria and lactobacilli in the hindgut. We further speculate that a higher butyrate production in colonic digesta relates to changes in gene expression in the jejunum by thus far unknown mechanisms.
2018-01-29 | GSE101147 | GEO
Project description:The study investigated the impact of environment on the composition of the gut microbiota and mucosal immune development and function at gut surfaces in early and adult life. Piglets of similar genotype were reared in indoor and outdoor environments and in an experimental isolator facility. Mucosa-adherent microbial diversity in the pig ileum was characterized by sequence analysis of 16S rRNA gene libraries. Host-specific gene responses in gut ileal tissues to differences in microbial composition were investigated using Affymetrix microarray technology and Real-time PCR. Experiment Overall Design: Animals were reared on the sow at an outdoor or indoor facility. Additional piglets from the indoor facility were transferred to individual isolator units at 24 hours of age, and given a daily dose of antibiotic cocktail for the duration of the study. Piglets were weaned at day 28. From day 29 onwards, piglets were fed creep feed ad libitum. Ileal tissue samples were excised from N=6 piglets per group at day 5, 28 and 56.
2009-12-05 | E-GEOD-15256 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The preferential localization of some neoplasms, such as serrated polyps, in specific areas of the intestine suggests that non-genetic factors may be important for their development. To test this hypothesis, we took advantage of transgenic mice that expressed HB-EGF throughout the intestine, but develop serrated polyps only in the cecum. Here we show that a host-specific microbiome was associated with serrated polyps, and that alterations of the microbiota induced by antibiotic treatment or by embryo-transfer rederivation markedly inhibited the formation of serrated polyps in the cecum. Mechanistically, development of serrated polyps was associated with a local decrease in epithelial barrier-function, bacterial invasion, production of antimicrobials, and increased expression of several inflammatory factors such as IL-17, Cxcl2, Tnf-M-NM-1, and IL-1. Increased number of neutrophils were found within the serrated polyps, and their depletion significantly reduced polyp growth. Together these results indicate that non-genetic factors contribute to the development of serrated polyps and suggest that the development of these intestinal neoplasms in the cecum is driven by the interplay between genetic changes in the host, an inflammatory response, and a host-specific microbiota. Paired design; Surrounding and SP samples were obtained from the same mouse (n=3; mouse 1, 2, 3)
2014-02-12 | E-GEOD-47734 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:It has been widely recognized that the microbiota has the capacity to shape host gene expression and physiological functions. However, there remains a paucity of comprehensive study revealing host transcriptional landscape regulated by the microbiota. Here, we comprehensively examined mRNA landscapes in mouse tissues (brain and cecum) from specific pathogen free (SPF) and germ-free mouse (GF) using Nanopore direct RNA sequencing. Our results show that the microbiome has global influence on host’s RNA modifications (m6A, m5C, Ψ), isoform generation, poly(A) tail length (PAL), and transcript abundance in both brain and cecum tissues. Moreover, the microbiome exerts tissue-specific effects on various post-transcriptional regulatory processes. In addition, the microbiome impacts the coordination of multiple RNA modifications in host brain and cecum tissues. In conclusion, we establish the relationship between microbial regulation and gene expression, our results help the understanding of the mechanisms by which the microbiome reprograms host gene expression.
2024-09-11 | GSE261724 | GEO