Project description:Differential expression in human peripheral blood monocytes between F. novicida-infected and uninfected, and between Francisella tularensis tularensis isolate Schu S4 and uninfected. The goal was to examine genomewide transcriptional reponses to these two strains, and identify differentially-regulated genes that may help explain the virulence of Schu S4. Keywords: Immune Response, Human Monocytes, Bacteria, Francisella
Project description:To understand differences of gene expression profiles between Francisella strains RNA profiles of Francisella strains were generated by deep sequencing, in triplicate, using NovaSeq6000. qRT–PCR validation was performed using SYBR Green assays. Our study represents the first detailed differential transcriptomic analysis of Francisella strains , with biologic replicates, generated by RNA-seq technology.
Project description:Differential expression in human peripheral blood monocytes between F. novicida-infected and uninfected, and between Francisella tularensis tularensis isolate Schu S4 and uninfected. The goal was to examine genomewide transcriptional reponses to these two strains, and identify differentially-regulated genes that may help explain the virulence of Schu S4. Experiment Overall Design: Human monocytes were infected with the Schu S4 isolate of Francisella tularensis tularensis (n=4), with F. tularensis subspecies novicida isolate U112 (n=4) or were left uninfected (n=6). Gene expression values were calculated using the gcrma package in R and BioConductor, and limma to identify differentially expressed genes. Submitted here are expression values calculated using R 2.7.1 and BioConductor 2.2 (FreeBSD/amd64) but the original were done using R 2.6.1 and BioConductor 2.1 (FreeBSD/amd64). Twelve other chips were pooled with these 14 for preprocessing.
Project description:The goal of this study is to determine the host response of human epithelial cells during infection with Francisella Tularensis. For this purpose, A549 human epithelial cell line was infected with Francisella tularensis spp. holarctica strain LVS for different times of infection, in duplicates. At different times post infection (0.5/1/3/6/12/24 hours post infection) cells were harvested and total RNA was extracted. RNA-seq libraries were constructed and sequencing of 100bp paired-end was performed on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 system. Sequencing yielded about 22M reads per sample that were mapped to the human genome (Human: GRCh38) resulting with the identification of 21,066 transcripts. The expression of the infected samples was compared to mock sample, and RNA ratios were clustered using partitioning clustering. This approach allowed clustering of the cellular transcripts into 5 distinct classes based on similarities in temporal expression profiles. We next carried out GO term enrichment analysis for each of these five cluster. Our study represents the first detailed analysis of human epithelial response to Francisella tularensis infection, and provide a framework for comparative investigations of genes and mechanisms that may contribute to the infection.
