Sander vitreus strain:Hatchet Creek
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA689095 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:Sander vitreus isolate:WEE_64 Genome sequencing and assembly
| PRJNA528354 | ENA
Project description:Sander vitreus isolate:19-12246 Genome sequencing and assembly
| PRJNA808842 | ENA
Project description:Megaselia abdita breed:Sander Genome sequencing and assembly
| PRJNA1164289 | ENA
Project description:Sander lucioperca alternate pseudohaplotype genome sequencing
| PRJNA817088 | ENA
Project description:Sander lucioperca principal pseudohaplotype genome sequencing
| PRJNA817089 | ENA
Project description:Sander lucioperca strain:Sachsen Raw sequence reads
| PRJNA752338 | ENA
Project description:We used the mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) array we developed to test whether our arrays could be used to monitor the efficacy of remediation at an estuarine Superfund site. Shipyard Creek is a chromium-contaminated Superfund site in Charleston, SC undergoing remediation, therefore it provides a unique opportunity to study the efficacy of arrays as a molecular biomarker in of toxicant effects in mummichogs. Mummichogs were captured in Shipyard Creek in Charleston, SC prior to remediation (2000), after remediation began (2003), and as remediation further progressed (2005). Simultaneously, mummichogs were collected from a reference site at the Winyah-Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve (NERR). The hepatic gene expression pattern of fish captured at Shipyard Creek showed wide differences from the fish captured at NERR in 2000. As remediation progressed the gene expression pattern of fish captured at Shipyard Creek became increasingly similar to fish captured at NERR, and the number of genes differently expressed dropped from 22 to 4. The magnitude of differential gene expression of the individual genes also decreased during remediation. The recovering gene expression profile is associated with lower chromium bioavailability, demonstrated through significantly decreased body burden and sediment concentrations. For example, sediment concentrations at Shipyard Creek were 80-fold greater than NERR in 2000, 51-fold greater in 2003, and only 8-fold greater in 2005. However, hydraulic dredging in 2005 stirred up the sediments and increased body burden of chromium even though chromium sediment concentrations continued to drop. Therefore, the number of differentially expressed genes increased to 9. Overall, the data supports our hypothesis that arrays can be used to monitor site mitigation, as the number of genes differentially expressed mimics the body burden and also indicates when on-site remediation is increasing bioavailability. Keywords: Field site
2006-09-01 | GSE4211 | GEO