Project description:New approach methodologies (NAMs) that efficiently provide information about chemical hazard without using whole animals are needed to accelerate the pace of chemical safety assessments. Technological advancements in gene expression assays have made in vitro high-throughput transcriptomics (HTTr) a feasible option for NAMs-based hazard characterization of environmental chemicals. In the present study, we evaluated the Templated Oligo with Sequencing Readout (TempO-Seq) assay for HTTr concentration-response screening of a small set of chemicals in the human-derived MCF7 cell model. Our experimental design included a variety of reference samples and reference chemical treatments in order to objectively evaluate TempO-Seq assay performance. To facilitate analysis of these data, we developed a robust and scalable bioinformatics pipeline using open-source tools. We also developed a novel gene expression signature-based concentration-response modeling approach and compared the results to a previously implemented workflow for concentration-response analysis of transcriptomics data using BMDExpress. Analysis of reference samples and reference chemical treatments demonstrated highly reproducible differential gene expression signatures. In addition, we found that aggregating signals from individual genes into gene signatures prior to concentration-response modeling yielded in vitro transcriptional biological pathway altering concentrations (BPACs) that were closely aligned with previous ToxCast high-throughput screening (HTS) assays. Often these identified signatures were associated with the known molecular target of the chemicals in our test set as the most sensitive components of the overall transcriptional response. This work has resulted in a novel and scalable in vitro HTTr workflow that is suitable for high throughput hazard evaluation of environmental chemicals.
Project description:The development of high-throughput anticancer drug screening using patient-derived cancer cell lines (PDCs) that maintain their original characteristics in an in vitro three-dimensional (3D) culture system poses a significant challenge for achieving personalized cancer medicine. Because stromal tissue plays a critical role in the composition and maintenance of the cancer microenvironment, in vitro 3D-culture using reconstructed stromal tissues has attracted much attention. Here, a simple and unique in vitro 3D-culture method using heparin and collagen together with fibroblast and endothelial cells to fabricate vascularized 3D-stromal tissues for in vitro culture of PDCs is reported. While co-treatment with bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the vascular endothelial growth factor, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) significantly reduced the survival rate of the 3D-cultured PDCs to 30%, separate addition of each drug did not induce such strong cytotoxicity, suggesting the possibility of evaluating the combined effect of anticancer drug and an angiogenesis inhibitor. Surprisingly, drug evaluation using eight PDCs with the 3D-culture method resulted in a drug efficacy concordance rate of 75% with clinical history. The model is expected to be applied to in vitro throughput drug screening for the development of personalized cancer medicine.
Project description:To identify the pluripotency and the neural fate of two hiPSC-derived neural progenitor cell lines by evaluating their transcriptional profiles. We hereby report that the cells used in our study were progenitor cells of neural fate.
Project description:With thousands of chemicals in commerce and the environment, rapid identification of potential hazards is a critical need. Combining broad molecular profiling with targeted in vitro assays, such as high-throughput transcriptomics (HTTr) and receptor screening assays, could improve identification of chemicals that perturb key molecular targets associated with adverse outcomes. We aimed to link transcriptomic readouts to individual molecular targets and integrate transcriptomic predictions with orthogonal receptor-level assays in a proof-of-concept framework for chemical hazard prioritization. Transcriptomic profiles generated via TempO-Seq in U-2 OS and HepaRG cell lines were used to develop signatures comprised of genes uniquely responsive to reference chemicals for distinct molecular targets. These signatures were applied to 75 reference and 1,126 non-reference chemicals screened via HTTr in both cell lines. Selective bioactivity towards each signature was determined by comparing potency estimates against the bulk of transcriptomic bioactivity for each chemical. Chemicals predicted by transcriptomics were confirmed for target bioactivity and selectivity using available orthogonal assay data from US EPA’s ToxCast program. A subset of 37 selectively acting chemicals from HTTr that did not have sufficient orthogonal data were prospectively tested using one of five receptor-level assays. Of the 1,126 non-reference chemicals screened, 201 demonstrated selective bioactivity in at least one transcriptomic signature, and 57 were confirmed as selective nuclear receptor agonists. Chemicals bioactive for each signature were significantly associated with orthogonal assay bioactivity, and signature-based points-of-departure were equally or more sensitive than biological pathway altering concentrations in 81.2% of signature-prioritized chemicals. Prospective profiling found that 18 of 37 (49%) chemicals without prior orthogonal assay data were bioactive against the predicted receptor. Our work demonstrates that integrating transcriptomics with targeted orthogonal assays in a tiered framework can support Next Generation Risk Assessment by informing putative molecular targets and prioritizing chemicals for further testing. NOTE: this GEO entry only includes the HepaRG cell line data; the U-2 OS cell line data can be located via GEO accession number GSE274318.
Project description:We introduce a new high-throughput transcriptomics (HTTr) platform comprised of a collagen sandwich primary rat hepatocyte culture and the TempO-Seq assay for screening and prioritizing potential hepatotoxicants. We selected 14 chemicals based on their risk of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and tested them in hepatocytes at two treatment concentrations. HTTr data was generated using the TempO-Seq whole transcriptome and S1500+ assays. The HTTr platform exhibited high reproducibility between technical replicates (r>0.9) but biological replication was greater for TempO-Seq S1500+ (r>0.85) than for the whole transcriptome (r>0.7). Reproducibility between biological replicates was dependent on the strength of transcriptional effects induced by a chemical treatment. Despite targeting a smaller number of genes, the S1500+ assay clustered chemical treatments and produced gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) scores comparable to those of the whole transcriptome. Connectivity mapping showed a high-level of reproducibility between TempO-Seq data and Affymetrix GeneChip data from the Open TG-GATES project with high concordance between the S1500+ gene set and whole transcriptome. Taken together, our results provide guidance on selecting the number of technical and biological replicates and support the use of TempO-Seq S1500+ assay for a high-throughput platform for screening hepatotoxicants.
Project description:New approach methodologies (NAMs) aim to accelerate the pace of chemical risk assessment while simultaneously reducing cost and dependency on animal studies. High Throughput Transcriptomics (HTTr) is an emerging NAM in the field of chemical hazard evaluation for establishing in vitro points-of-departure and providing mechanistic insight. In the current study, 1,201 test chemicals were screened for bioactivity at eight concentrations using a 24-hour exposure duration in the human- derived U-2 OS osteosarcoma cell line with HTTr. Assay reproducibility was assessed using three reference chemicals that were screened on every assay plate. The resulting transcriptomics data were analyzed by aggregating signal from genes into signature scores using gene set enrichment analysis, followed by concentration-response modeling of signatures scores. Signature scores were used to predict putative mechanisms of action, and to identify biological pathway altering concentrations (BPACs). BPACs were consistent across replicates for each reference chemical, with replicate BPAC standard deviations as low as 5.6×10-3 µM, demonstrating the internal reproducibility of HTTr-derived potency estimates. BPACs of test chemicals showed modest agreement (R2 = 0.55) with existing phenotype altering concentrations from high throughput phenotypic profiling using Cell Painting of the same chemicals in the same cell line. Altogether, this HTTr based chemical screen contributes to an accumulating pool of publicly available transcriptomic data relevant for chemical hazard evaluation and reinforces the utility of cell based molecular profiling methods in estimating chemical potency and predicting mechanism of action across a diverse set of chemicals.
Project description:The traditional method for studying cancer in vitro is to grow immortalized cancer cells in two-dimensional (2D) monolayers on plastic. However, many cellular features are impaired in these unnatural conditions and big alterations in gene expression in comparison to tumors have been reported. Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models have become increasingly popular and are suggested to be better models than 2D monolayers due to improved cell-to-cell contacts and structures that resemble in vivo architecture. The aim of this study was to develop a simple high-throughput 3D drug screening method and to compare drug responses in JIMT1 breast cancer cells when grown in 2D, in polyHEMA coated anchorage independent 3D models and in Matrigel on-top 3D cell culture models. We screened 102 compounds with multiple concentrations and biological replicates for their effects on cell proliferation. The cells were either treated immediately upon plating or they were allowed to grow in 3D for four days prior to the drug treatment. Big variations in drug responses were observed between the models indicating that comparisons of culture model influenced drug sensitivities cannot be made based on effects of a single drug. However, we show with the 63 most prominent drugs that, in general, JIMT1 cells grown on Matrigel were significantly more sensitive to drugs than cells grown in 2D cultures, while responses of cells grown in polyHEMA resembled those of 2D. Furthermore, comparison of gene expression profiles of the cell culture models to xenograft tumors indicated that cells cultured in Matrigel and as xenografts most closely resembled each other. In this study we also suggest that 3D cultures can provide a platform for systematic experimentation of larger compound collections in a high-throughput mode and be used as alternatives for traditional 2D screens towards better comparability to in vivo state. Gene expression analysis of JIMT1 breast cancer cells cultured as xenografts for 43 days, in two dimensional cultures for seven days (2D7d), in polyHEMA three dimensional cell culture models for four and seven days (PH7d and PH7d), and in Matrigel three dimensional cultures for four and seven days (MG4d and MG7d). Two biological replicates was included for each sample.
Project description:The traditional method for studying cancer in vitro is to grow immortalized cancer cells in two-dimensional (2D) monolayers on plastic. However, many cellular features are impaired in these unnatural conditions and big alterations in gene expression in comparison to tumors have been reported. Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models have become increasingly popular and are suggested to be better models than 2D monolayers due to improved cell-to-cell contacts and structures that resemble in vivo architecture. The aim of this study was to develop a simple high-throughput 3D drug screening method and to compare drug responses in JIMT1 breast cancer cells when grown in 2D, in polyHEMA coated anchorage independent 3D models and in Matrigel on-top 3D cell culture models. We screened 102 compounds with multiple concentrations and biological replicates for their effects on cell proliferation. The cells were either treated immediately upon plating or they were allowed to grow in 3D for four days prior to the drug treatment. Big variations in drug responses were observed between the models indicating that comparisons of culture model influenced drug sensitivities cannot be made based on effects of a single drug. However, we show with the 63 most prominent drugs that, in general, JIMT1 cells grown on Matrigel were significantly more sensitive to drugs than cells grown in 2D cultures, while responses of cells grown in polyHEMA resembled those of 2D. Furthermore, comparison of gene expression profiles of the cell culture models to xenograft tumors indicated that cells cultured in Matrigel and as xenografts most closely resembled each other. In this study we also suggest that 3D cultures can provide a platform for systematic experimentation of larger compound collections in a high-throughput mode and be used as alternatives for traditional 2D screens towards better comparability to in vivo state.