Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

ABSTRACT: Impact of DNA extraction methods and comparison of different sampling spots of the cattle microbiome

PROVIDER: PRJNA718141 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR14090447_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR14090447_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR14090448_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR14090448_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR14090449_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 72

Similar Datasets

Airway microbiota in patients with synchronous multiple primary lung cancer: the bacterial topography of the respiratory tract

Project description:we analyzed the characteristics of the respiratory microbiome, which was collected from different sites and using different sampling methods.

2022-04-09 | GSE200111 | GEO

human gut metagenome

Project description:Comparison of microbial DNA extraction methods for clinical applications

| PRJDB7617 | ENA

Project description:Comparison of Faecal Sampling Methods

| PRJNA648177 | ENA

Project description:Variations in Gut Microbiome Profiles Under Different DNA Extraction Methods: A Multidimensional Evaluation

| PRJNA807123 | ENA

DNA isolation and informatics for microbiome studies

Project description:Toward standards in clinical microbiome studies: comparison of DNA extraction methods and bioinformatic pipelines

| PRJEB34118 | ENA

Project description:Comparison of DNA extraction methods for long-read mNGS testing

| PRJNA824617 | ENA

Project description:A Comparison of Sampling Methods for Examining the Laryngeal Microbiome

| PRJNA354188 | ENA

The effects from DNA extraction methods on the evaluation of microbial diversity associated with human colonic tissue

Project description:Recent advances in (meta)genomic methods have provided new opportunities to examine host-microbe-environment interactions in the human gut. While opportunities exist to extract DNA from freshly sourced colonic tissue there are potentially valuable sources of DNA from historical studies that might also be examined. We examined how four different tissue DNA extraction methods employed in past clinical trials might impact the recovery of microbial DNA from a colonic tissue sample as assessed using a custom designed phylogenetic microarray for human gut bacteria and archaebacteria. While all methods of DNA extraction produced similar phylogenetic profiles some extraction specific biases were also observed. Real time PCR analysis targeting several bacterial groups substantiated this observation. These data suggest that while the efficacy of different DNA extraction methods differs somewhat all the methods tested produce an accurate representation of microbial diversity. This suggests that DNA samples archived in biobanks should be suitable for retrospective analyses.

2010-01-01 | GSE18420 | GEO

Homo sapiens

Project description:H sapiens brain genome sequencing with different DNA extraction methods

| PRJNA291342 | ENA

Microbiota lung tissue.

Project description:Comparison of five DNA extraction and purification methods for microbiome characterization from the lung tissue.

| PRJEB31011 | ENA