Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

ABSTRACT: Choice of commercial DNA extraction method does not affect 16S sequencing outcomes in cloacal swabs

PROVIDER: PRJNA720437 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR14190449_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR14190449_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR14190450_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR14190450_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR14190451_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 100

Similar Datasets

Project description:MiDAS DNA Extraction and primer choice

| PRJEB8668 | ENA

Comparison of RNA Isolation Methods in Yeast on RNA-Seq: Implications for Differential Expression and Meta-Analyses

Project description:Based on the different chemistries of phenol extraction of RNA versus commercial kits, we hypothesized that certain species of mRNA may be preferentially extracted depending upon method, which could masquerade as differential expression in downstream RNA-seq experiments. We tested this using Saccharomyces cerevisiae samples that only differ in the RNA isolation method: a "standard" hot phenol extraction, versus two different commercial RNA isolation kits. While the kits had comparable relative mRNA abundances, samples isolated with hot phenol had higher relative abundance of mRNAs encoding membrane proteins. We hypothesize that hot phenol better solubilizes mRNAs associated with cellular membranes. We then compared the effects of each RNA isolation method on the ability to identify differentially expressed transcripts, using the yeast heat shock response a test case. The method of RNA isolation had little effect on the ability to identify differentially expressed transcripts. Thus, experiments within a single lab are unlikely to be affected by the choice of RNA isolation method as long as the same method is used throughout an experiment. For meta-analyses however, researchers should be cautious if trying to compare experiments where the RNA isolation methods differ.

2019-08-07 | GSE135430 | GEO

A multi-center study: the application value of plasma exosomal non-coding RNA in the early screening and clinical progress of colorectal cancer

Project description:Interventions: Gold Standard:Gastroscopy, colonoscopy, pathological diagnosis;Index test:Plasma exosome extraction: commercial plasma exosome extraction kit (EZB company) extraction. Extraction of plasma exosomal miRNA: Advanced probe method RT-qPCR extraction kit (Thermo Company). Primary outcome(s): exosome microRNA Study Design: Cohort study

| 40619 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Project description:Metagenomics of penguin cloacal swabs

| PRJNA661635 | ENA

Human gut microbiota, COVID-19 patients with mild or severe symptoms.

Project description:Analysis of COVID-19 hospitalized patients, with different kind of symptoms, by human rectal swabs collection and 16S sequencing approach.

2022-09-22 | E-MTAB-12236 | biostudies-arrayexpress

DNA extraction method from alfalfa

Project description:DNA extraction method from alfalfa Metagenome

| PRJNA901244 | ENA

human gut metagenome

Project description:Method assessment of fecal DNA extraction

| PRJDB6503 | ENA

DNA_nanocellulose

Project description:DNA extraction method for mineral samples

| PRJEB61213 | ENA

DNA Extraction

Project description:DNA extraction method targeted loci environmental