Project description:Curration of small RNAs from four melanogaster-subgroup species (Drosophila simulans, Drosophila sechellia, Drosophila erecta, and Drosophila yakuba) for the purpose of non-coding RNA annotation and comparative genomics assessment.
Project description:We used DamID-seq to analyze the genome-wide binding patterns of the group B Sox proteins Dichaete and SoxNeuro in four species of Drosophila: D. melanogaster, D. simulans, D. yakuba and D. pseudoobscura. Both binding site turnover between species and a comparison of the binding properties of the two partially-redundant transcription factors were analyzed. We found that, despite widespread turnover, genomic intervals that are commonly bound by both Dichaete and SoxNeuro are highly conserved in Drosophila. DamID for Dichaete (Dichaete-Dam) was performed in D. melanogaster, D. simulans, D. yakuba and D. pseudoobscura, while DamID for SoxNeuro (SoxN-Dam) was performed in D. melanogaster and D. simulans. The control experiment, Dam-only, was performed in all species. Three biological replicates were sequenced for each condition in each species.
Project description:D. yakuba, D. simulans, and D. melanogaster female gDNA hybridized with D. melanogaster male gDNA to assess aCGH as a means of identification of duplicated genes
Project description:Curration of small RNAs from four melanogaster-subgroup species (Drosophila simulans, Drosophila sechellia, Drosophila erecta, and Drosophila yakuba) for the purpose of non-coding RNA annotation and comparative genomics assessment. Non-replicated small RNA samples from four melanogaster-subgroup species.
Project description:This data consists of RNA-seq data of whole animal white pre pupa of four Drosophila species: Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans, Drosophila yakuba, and Drosophila pseudoobscura. The processed RPKM values are calculated following the method in Garber et al 2011 Nature Methods paper.
Project description:D. yakuba, D. simulans, and D. sechellia gDNA competitively hybridized against D. melanogaster to evaluate aCGH as a means to identify diverged orthologs.
Project description:D. yakuba, D. simulans, and D. melanogaster female gDNA hybridized with D. melanogaster male gDNA to assess aCGH as a means of identification of duplicated genes 6 D. melanogaster female vs D. melanogaster male hybs, 6 D. simulans female vs D. melanogaster male hybs, and 4 D. yakuba female vs D. melanogaster male hybs, all with balanced dye swaps
Project description:D. yakuba, D. simulans, and D. sechellia gDNA competitively hybridized against D. melanogaster to evaluate aCGH as a means to identify diverged orthologs. 2 D. sechellia vs D. melanogaster hybs - with dye swap, 2 D. simulans vs D. melanogaster hybs with dye swap, and 8 D. yakuba vs D. melanogaster hybs with balanced dye swaps. D. yakuba vs. D. melanogaster were then analyzed in all 2,4,6,8 possible combinations that incorporated dye-swap to asses sources of variation.
Project description:We sequenced mRNA from whole flies of females and male of Drosophila melanogaster, D. simulans, D. yakuba, D. ananassae, D. pseudobscura, D. mojavensis, and D. virilis as part of the modENCODE project to validate novel gene models found in D. melanogaster, identify genes differentially expressed between the sexes and sex-specific alternative splicing events, and examine the evolution of gene expression.
Project description:This is a dataset which comprises the following two different kinds of genomic data in Drosophila species: First, triplicate ChIP-seq data of CTCF (CCCTC binding factor) binding profiles in each of the four closely related Drosophila species : Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans, Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila pseudoobscura at white pre pupa stage; Second, triplicate RNA-seq data of white pre pupa whole animals of three Drosophila species: Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans and Drosophila yakub. The binding site/region/peaks are called using a modified method of QuEST( please see details in our related publication). The sequence read counts and RPKM values are calculated following the method in Mortazavi et al 2008 Nature Methods paper. For data usage terms and conditions, please refer to http://www.genome.gov/27528022 and http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/ENCODE/ENCODEDataReleasePolicyFinal2008.pdf